sult in a more efficient use of filterCache.
>
> Regards,
>
> *Juan*
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Juan Manuel Alvarez
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone!
>>
>> I would like to ask you a question about a problem I am facing with a
>> Solr query
Hi everyone!
I would like to ask you a question about a problem I am facing with a
Solr query.
I have a field "tags" of type "textgen" and some documents with the
values "myothertag,mytag".
When I use the query:
/solr/select?sort=name_sort+asc&start=0&qf=tags&q.alt=*:*&fq={!field
q.op=AND f=tags
Thanks!!! That did the trick! =o)
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>> I am trying to search in all documents using the dismax
>> parser.
>>
>> A sample query that works using the q parameter goes like
>> this:
>> select/?q=air&qf=description%20name&start=0&rows=60&sort=name+as
Hello everyone! I would like to ask you a question.
I am trying to search in all documents using the dismax parser.
A sample query that works using the q parameter goes like this:
select/?q=air&qf=description%20name&start=0&rows=60&sort=name+asc&fq=(projectId:1)&defType=dismax&fq=(type:3)&fq=(fol
I use the POCO C++ library (http://pocoproject.org/) to send
HTML requests to Solr and to parse the XML response.
Cheers!
Juan M.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 9:54 AM, prasad deshpande
> wrote:
>> It seems Solr/Lucene is completely developed in Ja
I finally worked it out!
The setting that was giving me trouble was autocommit. I set it to
true and now the UPDATE queries are reflected in the database.
Cheers!
Juan M.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Juan Manuel Alvarez wrote:
> Hi Ephraim! Thanks again for taking the time to help
ems perform the update first and then
> the select? Does it make a difference if you change the order? Did you try
> omitting the TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE part?
>
> Ephraim Ofir
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Juan Manuel Alvarez [mailto:naici...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thurs
id from blah
>
> But if that doesn't work then you may be out of luck.
>
> cheers,
>
> Travis
>
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Juan Manuel Alvarez
> wrote:
>
>> Erick:
>>
>> Thanks for the quick response.
>>
>> I can't use
're using has
> permissions to do the updates you want? Not sure about postgres but I
> think some jdbc's require that the connection be defined as rw, maybe
> you should try adding readOnly="false" to your jdbc definition.
>
> Ephraim Ofir
>
> -----Origi
t the UPDATE has no effect on the database"
> Or do you mean "effect on the index"? If the latter, then the select
> would only have a chance of updating the IDs of the Solr documents...
>
> At least I think that's close to reality...
>
> Best
>
ids.
The ids are returned ok, but the UPDATE has no effect on the database.
Cheers!
Juan M.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Well, let's see the queries you're sending, and your DIH configuration.
>
> Otherwise, we're just guessing...
>
> B
Hi! I would like to ask you a question about using a deltaQuery in DIH.
I am syncing with a PostgreSQL database.
At first I was calling a function that made two queries: an UPDATE and a SELECT.
The select result was properly returned, but the UPDATE query did not
made any changes,
so I tried calli
ira/browse/SOLR-1721
>
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Juan Manuel Alvarez
> wrote:
>> Hello everyone!
>> I have been doing some tests, but it seems I can't make the
>> synchronize flag work.
>>
>> I have made two tests:
>> 1) DIH with comm
Thanks for the answer Barani!
I was doing the same thing (queuing requests and querying solr
status), but I was hoping some flag/configuration would do the trick.
I will continue with that approach then! =o)
Thanks!
Juan M.
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 3:50 AM, bbarani wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As far as I
Hello!!! I am working with Solr on my first project and I am really
happy so far, both with the product and with the community.
I am having some doubts about how DIH works.
How does DIH handles concurrent requests from different users? Does
it queue them? Or if an import is in progress it reject
ectUpdateHandler2 commit
INFO: start
commit(optimize=false,waitFlush=true,waitSearcher=true,expungeDeletes=false)
In (2) it seems like the commit is being fired before the delta-update finishes.
Am I using the "synchronous" flag right?
Thanks in advance!
Juan M.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010
Thanks for all the help! It is really appreciated.
For now, I can afford the parallel requests problem, but when I put
synchronous=true in the delta import, the call still returns with
outdated items.
Examining the log, it seems that the commit operation is being
executed after the operation retur
> previous request is still running it bounces the second request.
>
> HTH,
> Alex
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Juan Manuel Alvarez
> wrote:
>> Hello everyone! I would like to ask you a question about DIH.
>>
>> I am using a database and DIH to
Hello everyone! I would like to ask you a question about DIH.
I am using a database and DIH to sync against Solr, and a GUI to
display and operate on the items retrieved from Solr.
When I change the state of an item through the GUI, the following happens:
a. The item is updated in the DB.
b. A del
ity and run again at 11:20 ..
> then, no
> entity will match the delta-query because solr will ask for a
> modification_date > 11:10 (last solr-run at this time).
>
> you'll only need to update the last_modified field (in your application)
> when the entity is changed and
Hello everyone!
I would like to ask you a question about DIH and delta import.
I am trying to sync Solr with a PostgreSQL database and I have a field
"ent_lastModified" of type "timestamp without timezone".
Here is my xml file:
Full-import works fine, but whe
Thank you Shawn! That was exactly what I was looking for! =o)
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/22/2010 10:06 AM, Juan Manuel Alvarez wrote:
>>
>> My question is:
>> Every time I do an import operation (delta or full) with DIH, I only
>> need
Hello everyone!
I am using Solr synced with a PostgreSQL database using DIH and I am
facing an issue.
The thing is that I use one Solr server and different Postgre schemas
in the same database, with the same tables inside each one, so the
following queries:
SELECT * FROM "schema1"."Objects";
and
distro.
>
> allistair
>
> On Oct 14, 2010, at 6:13 PM, Juan Manuel Alvarez wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone! I am new to Solr and Lucene and I would like to ask
>> you a couple of questions.
>>
>> I am working on an existing system that has the data saved in a
&g
Hello everyone! I am new to Solr and Lucene and I would like to ask
you a couple of questions.
I am working on an existing system that has the data saved in a
Postgre DB and now I am trying to integrate Solr to use full-text
search and faceted search, but I am having a couple of doubts about
it.
25 matches
Mail list logo