yes, I am using this library and it works perfectly so far. If
something does not work you can just modify it
http://code.google.com/p/solr-php-client/
Johannes
2012/5/21 Tolga :
> Hi,
>
> Can you recommend a good PHP UI to search? Is SolrPHPClient good?
I meant
stats=true&stats.field=price&stats.facet=category
2012/2/6 Johannes Goll :
> you can use the StatsComponent
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/StatsComponent
>
> with stats=true&stats.price=category&stats.facet=category
>
> and pull the sum f
x27;, $12.00
> 3.video, 'cool video', $20.00
>
> so instead of getting (when faceting on category)
> books(2)
> video(1)
>
> I'd like to get:
> books ($22)
> video ($20)
>
> Is this something that can be even done? Any feedback would be much
> appreciated.
--
Dipl.-Ing.(FH)
Johannes Goll
211 Curry Ford Lane
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878
USA
Hi,
I am running apache-solr-3.1.0 and would like to change a field
attribute from stored="false" to
stored="true".
I have several hundred cores that have been indexed without storing
the field which is fine
as I only would like to retrieve the value for new data that I plan to
index with the
upd
another way is to store the original hierarchy in a sql database (in
the form: id, parent_id, name, level) and in the Lucene index store
the complete
hierarchy (from root to leave node) for each document in one field
using the ids of the sql database. In that way you can get documents
at any level
you set this up? We're running Solr3.4 under tomcat,
> OpenJDK 1.6.0.20
>
> btw, is the JRE just a different name for the VM? Apologies for such a
> newbie Java question.
>
>
>
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:51:44 -0400, Johannes Goll
> wrote:
>> we use th
we use the the following in production
java -server -XX:+UseParallelGC -XX:+AggressiveOpts
-XX:+DisableExplicitGC -Xms3G -Xmx40G -Djetty.port=
-Dsolr.solr.home= jar start.jar
more information
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/vmoptions-jsp-140102.html
Johannes
>>
>> Still a little confused as to why 1 core stays at 100% constantly - even
>> during the quiet periods?
>
> Could be background GC, depending on what you've got your JVM configured to
> use.
>
> Though that shouldn't stay at 100% for very long.
>
Did you try to submit multiple search requests in parallel? The apache ab tool
is great tool to simulate simultaneous load using (-n and -c).
Johannes
On Oct 15, 2011, at 7:32 PM, Rob Brown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Solr on a machine with 16 CPU cores, yet watching "top"
> shows that java i
d]. Here library_id
equals the shard/core name.
Is there an internal timeout for gathering shard results or other fixed
resource limitation ?
Johannes
2011/6/13 Yonik Seeley
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Johannes Goll
> wrote:
> > However, sporadically, Jetty 6.1.2X (sh
is parameter higher.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Huge-performance-drop-in-distributed-search-w-shards-on-the-same-server-container-tp2938421p2988464.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Johannes Goll
211 Curry Ford Lane
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878
other ideas that could
help to improve this (hardware/software configuration) ? Even for a subset
of 10M entries, the stat search takes on the order of 10 seconds.
Thanks in advance.
Johannes
2011/4/18 Johannes Goll
> any ideas why in this case the stats summaries are so slow ? Thank you
>
any ideas why in this case the stats summaries are so slow ? Thank you
very much in advance for any ideas/suggestions. Johannes
2011/4/5 Johannes Goll
> Hi,
>
> thank you for making the new apache-solr-3.1 available.
>
> I have installed the version from
>
> http://ap
Hi,
thank you for making the new apache-solr-3.1 available.
I have installed the version from
http://apache.tradebit.com/pub//lucene/solr/3.1.0/
and am running into very slow stats component queries (~ 1 minute)
for fetching the computed sum of the stats field
url: ?q=*:*&start=0&rows=0&stats=
Hi Alexander,
I have posted same question a few month ago. The only solution that came up
was to regenerate the index files using the new version. How did you do
this exactly with
luke 1.0.1 ? Would you mind sharing some of that magic ?
Best,
Johannes
2011/3/31 Alexander Aristov
> Didn't get
retireved with each doc, and then
> when you get your top facet constraints back, look at the first page of
> results, and figure out what the sun "weight" is for each of those
> constraints based solely on the page#1 results.
>
> i've had happy users using a similar appraoch in the past.
>
> -Hoss
--
Johannes Goll
211 Curry Ford Lane
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878
What field type do you recommend for a float stats.field for optimal Solr
1.4.1 StatsComponent performance ?
float, pfloat or tfloat ?
Do you recommend to index the field ?
2011/1/12 stockii
>
> my field Type is "double" maybe "sint" is better ? but i need double ...
> =(
> --
> View this m
se 3.0 and later.
Is there any other mechanism for converting index files to 3.x?
2011/1/6 Johannes Goll
> Hi,
>
> our index files have been created using Lucene 2.9.3 and solr 1.4.1.
>
> I am trying to use a patched version of the current trunk (solr 1.5.0 ? ).
> The patched v
Hi,
our index files have been created using Lucene 2.9.3 and solr 1.4.1.
I am trying to use a patched version of the current trunk (solr 1.5.0 ? ).
The patched version works fine with newly generated index data but
not with our existing data:
After adjusting the solrconfig.xml - I added the lin
Hi,
I have a facet field called option which may be multi-valued and
a weight field which is single-valued.
When I use the Solr 1.4.1 stats component with a facet field, i.e.
q=*:*&version=2.2&stats=true&
stats.field=weight&stats.facet=option
I get conflicting results for the stats count result
20 matches
Mail list logo
