On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:24 PM, GW wrote:
> Interesting, I managed to do Solr SQL
>
> It is true that pretty much all operations still work by calling a
collection API directly. The benefits I'm referring to are dynamic cluster
state discovery, routing of requests automatically based on the sta
with a .NET/C# lib is a wrapper for the REST API.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 16 August 2016 at 09:08, Joe Lawson opensourceconnections.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> All I have seen is SolrNET, forks of SolrNET and people using RestSharp.
> >>
> >>
All I have seen is SolrNET, forks of SolrNET and people using RestSharp.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Eirik Hungnes wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have been looking around for a library for .NET / C#. We are currently
> using SolrNet, but that is ofc not as well equipped as SolrJ, and have
> heard rumors
ing the field's query-time analyzer
> > - Create an OR query with the tokens that come out of the analysis
> >
> > You can look at the field query parser as something of a starting point
> for
> > this.
> >
> > I usually do this in the context of a boost q
FYI everyone, I've updated the README.md to be fully up to date for Solr
6.0 and the latest plugin release.
https://github.com/healthonnet/hon-lucene-synonyms/blob/master/README.md
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:34 PM, MaryJo Sminkey wrote:
> > OK - Slapping forehead now... D'oh!
> >
> > 1.2 >
> > Fl
FYI it's released
On Jun 16, 2016 11:06 AM, "Steve Rowe" wrote:
> Tomorrow-ish.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Jun 16, 2016, at 4:14 AM, Ramesh shankar wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yes, i used the solr-6.1.0-79 nightly builds and [subquery] transformer
> is
> > working fine in, any i
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has experience using the autophrasing solution on
> the Lucidworks blog:
>
>
> https://lucidworks.com/blog/2014/07/12/solution-for-multi-term-synonyms-in-lucenesolr-using-the-auto-phrasing-tokenfilter/
>
>
The auth-phrasing-token (APT) filter is a two pronged solution th
I'm sorry I wasn't more specific, I meant we were hijacking the thread with
the question, "Anyone used a different method of
handling multi-term synonyms that isn't as global?" as the original thread
was about getting synonym_edismax running.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:24 PM, MaryJo Sminkey wrote:
t;
> >
> > Sent with MailTrack
> > <
> https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature&lang=en&referral=mjsmin...@gmail.com&idSignature=22
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:39 PM, MaryJo Sminkey
> > wrote:
> >
> &g
the help!
>
> Mary Jo
>
> Sent with MailTrack
> <
> https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature&lang=en&referral=mjsmin...@gmail.com&idSignature=22
> >
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Joe Lawson <
> jlaw...@opensourceconnections.com> wro
>
> Advice: make sure on the schema that none of the fields your are running
> queries against do any complex query operations, especially make sure they
> aren't doing additional synonym resolution against the same file.
>
BTW. I'd do this first before messing with MM
Mary Jo.
It appears to be working correctly but you have a very complex query going
on so it can be confusing. Assuming you are using the queryParser as
provided in examples your query would look like "+sbc" when it enters the
queryParser and would look like "+((sbc)^2.0 (sb)^0.5 (small block)^0.5
Flume and Logstash can both ship to Solr.
On Jun 5, 2016 2:11 PM, "Otis Gospodnetic"
wrote:
> You can ship SOLR logs to Logsene or any other log management service and
> not worry too much about their storage/size.
>
> Otis
>
> > On Jun 5, 2016, at 02:08, Anil wrote:
> >
> > Hi ,
> >
> > i would
fig some more tomorrow and try to figure out what
> we're doing wrong.
>
> MJ
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Joe Lawson <
> jlaw...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
>
> > Nothing up until 5.0.4 was distributed on maven central. 5.0 -> 5.0.4 was
>
Nothing up until 5.0.4 was distributed on maven central. 5.0 -> 5.0.4 was
just a bunch of clean up to get it ready for maven (including the namespace
change).
Being that nearly all docs and articles talking about the plugin reference
the old 2.0 one could reasonably get confused as to what config
I mean the 5.0 namespace is different from the 2.0 not 3.0.
On Jun 1, 2016 5:43 PM, "Joe Lawson"
wrote:
2.0 is different from 3.0 so check the test config that is associated with
the 2.0 release. Ie
https://github.com/healthonnet/hon-lucene-syn
2.0 is different from 3.0 so check the test config that is associated with
the 2.0 release. Ie
https://github.com/healthonnet/hon-lucene-synonyms/blob/8f736da053510911517fcb8a712b1d8ca5c920d2/src/test/resources/solr/collection1/conf/example_solrconfig.xml
On Jun 1, 2016 3:10 PM, "John Bickersta
The docs are out of date for the synonym_edismax but it does work. Check
out the tests for working examples. I'll try to update it soon. I've run
the plugin on Solr 5 and 6, solrcloud and standalone. For running in
SolrCloud make sure you follow
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Addi
Yes they are both 6.0.
On Apr 25, 2016 1:07 PM, "Anshum Gupta" wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Can you confirm if the version of Solr and SolrJ are in sync ?
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Joe Lawson <
> jlaw...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
>
> > This
updates, etc
>
> http://yonik.com/solr/optimistic-concurrency/
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:24 PM Joe Lawson <
> jlaw...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm updating from a basic Solr Client to the ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient
> and
> > I'm hi
t;
> at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>> ~[na:1.8.0_92]
>
> at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>> ~[na:1.8.0_92]
>
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) ~[na:1.8.0_92]
>
>
Any help suggestions is appreciated.
Cheers,
Joe Lawson
, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8970
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8971
>
> : Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:35:22 -0400
> : From: Joe Lawson
> : Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> : To: solr-user@lucen
Thanks for the insight. I figured that it was something like that and
perhaps I has thread contention on a resource that wasn't really thread
safe.
I'll give your suggestions a shot tomorrow.
Regards,
Joe Lawson
On Apr 11, 2016 8:24 PM, "Chris Hostetter" wrote:
>
>
Check for example tests here too:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/master/solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please use MiniSolrCloudCluster instead of EmbeddedSolrServer for
> unit/integration te
tory class
[org.apache.solr.handler.component.HttpShardHandlerFactory]: Unable to
build KeyStore from file: null"
I don't really see any changes from 5 to 6 that cause this. Any clues? Here
is the code:
https://github.com/healthonnet/hon-lucene-synonyms/tree/solr-6.0.0
Thanks for the help,
Joe Lawson
Formation template.
>
> Best
> Ugo
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Joe Lawson <
> jlaw...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
>
> > we get to run commands like, docker run solr and have solr working!
> >
> > containers make new application de
we get to run commands like, docker run solr and have solr working!
containers make new application deployments a breeze.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Ugo Matrangolo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just curious: what you get by running Solr into a Docker container ?
>
> Best
> Ugo
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015
Hi Epo,
We aren't using Zookeeper or the SolrCloud stuff on docker yet but it looks
like Vincenzo was using three ZK containers, each with a different port.
Sincerely,
Joe Lawson
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Epo Jemba wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> thank you for your git repo. I
28 matches
Mail list logo
