Re: Sum of return fields

/issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298 ? > > Otis > > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch > Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ > > > > - Original Message > > From: Jim Adams > > To: solr-user@lucene.ap

Sum of return fields

Is it possible to add or subtract a value and return that field from the index in solr? Or do you have to do it programmatically afterwards? Thanks!

Re: All in one index, or multiple indexes?

It will depend on how much total volume you have. If you are discussing millions and millions of records, I'd say use multicore and shards. On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Tim Sell wrote: > Hi, > I am wondering if it is common to have just one very large index, or > multiple smaller indexes spe

Question about index sizes.

Can anyone give me a rule of thumb for knowing when you need to go to multicore or shards? How many records can be in an index before it breaks down? Does it break down? Is it 10 million? 20 million? 50 million? Thanks, Jim

Question about Solr memory usage.

I'm running an old version of Solr -- it's 1.2, and I'm about to upgrade to 1.3. But I have a question about Solr 1.2 memory usage. I am occasionally seeing out of memory errors in my Solr log. Doesn't Solr release memory after a document has been indexed ? I would not think it is right for th

Re: embedded wildcard search not working?

to change the order of those filters a bit. That's > not related to your wildcard question. > > Otis -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > > > From: Jim Adams > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.or

embedded wildcard search not working?

This is a straightforward question, but I haven't been able to figure out what is up with my application. I seem to be able to search on trailing wildcards just find. For example, fieldName:a* will return documents with apple, ardvaark, etc. in them. But if I was to try and search on a field con

Re: Range search question

Why is this? Thanks. On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > Jim Adams wrote: > >> True, which is what I'll probably do, but is there any way to do this >> using >> 'string'? Actually I have even seen this with date fields, which seems &

Re: Range search question

True, which is what I'll probably do, but is there any way to do this using 'string'? Actually I have even seen this with date fields, which seems very odd (more data being returned than I expected). On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > Jim Adams wrote: &g

Range search question

I have a string field in my schema that actually numeric data. If I try a range search: fieldInQuestion:[ 100 TO 150 ] I fetch back a lot of data that is NOT in this range, such as 11, etc. Any idea why this happens? Is it because this is a string? Thanks.

Re: Partitioning the index

that is what I thought. Thanks. On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > You'll need to re-index. > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Jim Adams wrote: > > > It's a range query. I don't have any faceted dat

Re: Partitioning the index

It's a range query. I don't have any faceted data. Can I limit the precision of the existing field, or must I re-index? Thanks. On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Jim Adams wrote: > > Are there any particular suggestions

Re: Partitioning the index

Are there any particular suggestions on memory size for a machine? I have a box that has only 1 million records on it - yet I'm finding that date searches are already unacceptable (30 seconds) slow. Other searches seem okay though. Thanks! On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:

Re: how large can the index be?

Why is NFS mounting such a bad idea? Some solutions for high available disks suggest that you DO mount the disks NFS to the boxes that need the data. On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote: > What you have below is not really what we call "Distribute

Re: date range query performance

Can someone explain what this means to me? I'm having a similar performance issue - it's an index with only 1 million records or so, but when trying to search on a date range it takes 30 seconds! Yes, this date is one with hours, minutes, seconds in them -- do I need to create an additional field

question about Solr directories on mounted file systems

I have an application that is using SOLR on a mounted file system. However, machine or human error can sometimes unmount the file system. This causes Solr to write index files to a different area from the index I am using. This also means that the index instance becomes corrupt, because some ent

Re: POST interface to sending queries to SOLR?

Could you point me to an example somewhere? Thanks! On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > : I know there is a 'GET' to send queries to Solr. But is there a POST > : interface to sending queries? If so, can someone point me in that > : direction? > > P

POST interface to sending queries to SOLR?

Folks, I know there is a 'GET' to send queries to Solr. But is there a POST interface to sending queries? If so, can someone point me in that direction? Thanks, Jim