ndex=PartnerContent.SearchProducts}parentProductId:A10E5AC6-306C-4B71-BE03-62ACA0C4D34D
JoinQuery({!join from=conceptId to=id
fromIndex=PartnerContent.SearchProducts}parentProductId:A10E5AC6-306C-4B71-BE03-62ACA0C4D34D)
That looks normal to me, but m
Jeff
On May 7, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Francois Perron wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know if there is some projects to integrate Solr with NoSQl
> like MongoDB.
>
> They already had a link like this between ElasticSearch and CoughDB. (Cough
> River I think)
>
>
ll clean and
> re-index on the Master?
>
> thank you,
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/should-slave-replication-be-turned-off-on-during-master-clean-and-re-index-tp3945531p3945531.html
> Sent from the Solr - User maili
Chars(),
> this would escape the whole query (not only the * character).
> Hope it helps.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 27 April 2012 21:12, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello:
>>
>> In my application domain, there is something known as a microRNA star
>> strand, which co
a?
>
> No, it is a rewrite.
>
> http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/cassandra-with-solr-integration-details
>
> wunder
> --
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wunderwood.org
>
>
>
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
unctuation character. Is that possible with edismax? Or would have I have to
revert to dismax?
Thanks,
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
egy perspective, is it a bit crazy to make a go
of this?
Thanks,
Jeff
On Dec 11, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
> Thanks Chris. I was just going to sit down and see if I could get join to do
> what I want within a single index. I'm glad I checked my email first. :)
>
&g
end of your final
> : paragraph. Is that because two cores are involved? Despite the join
>
> no .. it has nothing to do with the multiple core part of the problem --
> it's just how join works. it identifies an (unordered) set of "joined to"
> documents based on the matching "joined from" documents.
>
>
> -Hoss
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
ching the "tag" field.
>
> According to my tests, It looks like the "restaurant" query will always be
> parsed using the Lucene QParser. I did not find a way to use another
> QParser, like Dismax. Am I right or is there a way?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Pas
to remember is that {!join} is just a QParser that only matches some
> document Y if Y's "to" field "joins up" against some other document X's
> "from" field and document X matches the query the {!join} wraps. It
> doesn't give you any of the
ed partner-tmo].
Can the JoinQParserPlugin work in conjunction with edismax?
Thanks,
Jeff
On Dec 4, 2011, at 4:12 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
> Hello again:
>
> I'm looking at the newer join functionality
> (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join) to see if that will help me out. While
&g
don't see it in the
examples.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Dec 1, 2011, at 9:47 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I'm trying to relate together two different types of documents. Currently I
> have 'node' documents that reside in one index (core), and 'product mapping&
ying together two different
indexes.
Is it possible to accomplish my goal in a less ugly way than I outlined above?
Since we only have a single tenant to worry about, I could use a combined index
at least for a few months (separate fields per document type, IDs are unique
among
My app can then take this response and remove the prefix before returning the
> values and counts to the client. It may inflate the size of index some, but
> it sure beats my alternative proposals...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
>
> On Nov 26, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Jeff S
involved in handling the
request, then more investigation is needed.
Any inside information would be appreciated. Or, firmly stated I should not go
there would also be appreciated. :)
Cheers,
Jeff
On Nov 21, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Solr version: 3.4.0
>
&
re
> shouldn't be any issues with always have q.alt set if that's what you want.
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 11:15 , Jeff Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Hi Erik:
>>
>> It's not in the SolrJ library, but rather my use of it:
>>
>
request
handler).
I solved my problem by net setting *:* in my application, and left q.alt=*:* in
place.
Hope this helps. Again, this is stock Solr 3.4.0, running the Apache war under
Tomcat 6.
Jeff
On Nov 22, 2011, at 8:05 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 09:55 ,
ry
>>
>> Regds
>> Pravesh
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-make-effective-search-with-fq-and-q-params-tp3527217p3527535.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
es per
document. Does that make sense?
I may well have to re-evaluate my data model, but I'd like to get what I need
with what I have currently defined if possible.
Thanks,
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
hearing more and more about ElasticSearch. Can anyone give me a
>>>> rough overview on how these two technologies differ. What are the
>>>> strengths/weaknesses of each. Why would one choose one of the other?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
> --
> Regards / Med vennlig hilsen
> Tarjei Huse
> Mobil: 920 63 413
>
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
Hi Yonik:
On Jul 17, 2011, at 9:30 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
>> I don't want to query for a particular facet value, but rather have Solr do
>> a grouping of facet values. I'm not sure about the appropriate nomen
ow up front all of the possible values for a facet, and there are
many, and I'd rather not issue numerous queries to get the document IDs.
Anyway, perhaps I'm latching on to my hoped for approach after having such a
positive experience with faceting, and I should be looking at a different S
pplication, and I don't see a way to do
this. I'm using Sorl 3.3.
Many thanks!
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
that would be a single query, or one per disease?
But, faceting on disease gives me the document count for each disease type. Is
there a way I can use the faceting functionality and get the document IDs
rather than just a count? Solr must know the IDs are some point in calculating
the f
nique, it's hard
to believe I'm the first to encounter this issue. :)
Thanks,
Jeff
On Mar 4, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I'm trying to make use of FieldReaderDataSource so that I can read a (Oracle)
> database CLOB, and then use XPathEntity
separate structured field?
In my case, most of the fields I'm searching are small in size, and I just
need to know in what field(s) a match occurred. Often, the actual matched
characters are less important than the fact that the provided terms matched in
that field.
Take it eas
ode), not the FieldDataSource configured for the inner
entity (node) where I'm making use of XPathEntityProcessor.
What am I missing conceptually? I've found a few of references to the very
same problem, and I think I'm following the same pattern.
Thanks for any insights you can share,
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
ields along with highlighting, I
get the information I need to render meaningful results for the end user. But,
it has a sort of smell to it. :) Shall I look for another way, or am I
worrying about nothing?
I am current using Solr 3.1 trunk.
Thanks!
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
is is
not worth the effort and I should be be satisfied repeating the same
doc.addField() method calls.
Thanks,
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
http://www.535consulting.com
oolness in trunk
> has come with index format changes along the way.
>
> -Yonik
> http://lucidimagination.com
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
http://www.535consulting.com
t; Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message
>> From: Jeff Schmidt
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Sat, February 12, 2011 4:37:37 PM
>> Subject: Which version of Solr?
>>
>> Hello:
er/book
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Which-version-of-Solr-tp2482468p2498641.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
http://www.535consulting.com
o
hook up with Solr, I don't know.
I moved tomcat to port 8090 and things are good... Sigh.. What a big waste of
time.
Cheers,
Jeff
On Feb 14, 2011, at 2:29 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
> I figured instead of trying to index content, I'd simply issue a query via
> SolrJ. This s
I guess I'll try a
simpler app/unit test to see what happens...
This is really a big problem for me. Any suggests are greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Feb 13, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
> Hello again:
>
> Back to the javabin iissue:
>
> On Feb 12, 2011, at 6:
; -d
@nodes-products.xml "http://localhost:8080/solr/partner-tmo/update";
011
http code: 200
[imac:solr/input-data/tmo-products] jas%
Much better than a single null byte.
Any idea of what is going on? Apologies for the long email, but I'm trying to
provide all the details. This prob
Great, there be artifacts here! I was able to configure a repo using file:/...
to the dist/maven directory, and off we go.
Thanks again!
Jeff
On Feb 13, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
> Thanks David. I really like your book. Will there be a 3.x version coming
> along? :) I&
cene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Which-version-of-Solr-tp2482468p2487947.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
http://www.535consulting.com
a
>> null byte, which does not match the version number of 1 defined in Solr
>> common. Anyway, I can follow up on that issue if 1.4.1 is still the most
>> appropriate version to use these days. Otherwise, I'll try again with
>> whatever version you suggest.
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>>
>> Jeff
>> --
>> Jeff Schmidt
>> 535 Consulting
>> j...@535consulting.com
>> (650) 423-1068
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lance Norskog
> goks...@gmail.com
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
http://www.535consulting.com
null byte,
which does not match the version number of 1 defined in Solr common. Anyway, I
can follow up on that issue if 1.4.1 is still the most appropriate version to
use these days. Otherwise, I'll try again with whatever version you suggest.
Thanks a lot!
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
39 matches
Mail list logo
