PRWeb's Newspad.com search has been using a replicated Solr setup since
June 11, 2007. In that time, and I'm just checking the admin page on the
query server...3,000,000 requests since June across 350,000 documents.
This hardly taxes the server, it's load is about 0.20 with 20 rather
sleepy apa
Bharani wrote:
Hi,
I have got two sets of document
1) Primary Document
2) Occurrences of primary document
Since there is no such thing as "join" i can either
a) Post the primary document with occurrences as multi valued field
or
b) Post the primary document for every occurrences i.e. class
Mike Klaas wrote:
On 30-Aug-07, at 4:01 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
You could accomplish the goal without any coding by using phrase
queries: "calico calico calico"~1 will match only documents
that have at least three occurrences of calico. If this is
performant enough, you are done. O
Mike Klaas wrote:
On 30-Aug-07, at 1:22 PM, Jed Reynolds wrote:
Jed Reynolds wrote:
Apologies if this is in the Lucene FAQ, but I was looking thru the
Lucene syntax and I just didn't see it.
Is there a way to search for documents that have a certain number of
occurrences of a term i
Jed Reynolds wrote:
Apologies if this is in the Lucene FAQ, but I was looking thru the
Lucene syntax and I just didn't see it.
Is there a way to search for documents that have a certain number of
occurrences of a term in the document? Like, I want to find all
documents that have the
Apologies if this is in the Lucene FAQ, but I was looking thru the
Lucene syntax and I just didn't see it.
Is there a way to search for documents that have a certain number of
occurrences of a term in the document? Like, I want to find all
documents that have the term Calico mentioned three
Matthew Runo wrote:
It seems that as soon as I get a commit, snapshooter goes wild.
I have 1107 running instances of snapshooter right now..
I suspect you've got pathing and/or permissions issues.
First try running snapshooter -v, and it will be louder. I've often had
to dig in deeper, tho.
I'd like to thank everyone that created and helped bring us Solr.
Newspad is working awesomely.
http://www.newspad.com/
And sorting in 1.2.0 is going to be such a bonus!
Thanks!
Jed
Gunther, Andrew wrote:
What are people doing to restrict UpdateServlet access on production
installs of Solr. Are people removing that option and rotating in a new
index or restricting access from the jetty side.
I'm putting Solr on my DMZ without direct WAN access. If I had to put it
on
Venkatesh Seetharam wrote:
The hash idea sounds really interesting and if I had a fixed number of
indexes it would be perfect.
I'm infact looking around for a reverse-hash algorithm where in given a
docId, I should be able to find which partition contains the document
so I
can save cycles
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I almost didn't notice the exception fly by because there's s much
: log output, and I can see why I might not have noticed. Yay for
you should be able to configure it to put WARNING and SEVERE messages in a
seperate log file even.
Certainly! I learned to r
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 3/2/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do you all feel about returning an error when you add a document
with unknown fields?
+1
dynamicField definitions can be used if desired (including "*" to
match every undefined field).
If dynamicField definitions ar
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 3/3/07, Dimitar Ouzounov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But what hardware problem could it be? Tomorrow I'll make sure that the
memory is fine, but nothing
else comes to my mind.
Memory, motherboard, etc.
Try http://www.memtest86.com/ to test this.
It may be OS-related - p
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 3/3/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...The rationale with the solrconfig stuff is that a broken config
should
behave as best it can. This is great if you are running a real site
with people actively using it - it is a pain in the ass if you are
getti
Ryan McKinley wrote:
On 3/2/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/2/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The rationale with the solrconfig stuff is that a broken config should
> behave as best it can.
I don't think that's what I was actually going for in this instance
(the
Ryan McKinley wrote:
I almost didn't notice the exception fly by because there's s much
log output, and I can see why I might not have noticed. Yay for
scrollback! (Hrm, I might not have wanted to watch logging for 4
instances of solr all at once. Might explain why so much logging.)
This h
Yonik Seeley wrote:
If the actual schema was null, then that was probably some problem
parsing the schema.
If that's the case, hopefully you saw an exception in the logs on
startup?
Using apache-solr-1.1.0-incubating.
Actually not at first, but now I do. But I've gone back and re-created
First time user. Not interested in flamewar, just making a suggestion.
I just got Solr working with my own schema and it was only a little more
mysterious than I expected, having previously dealth with Nutch. Solr is
exactly what I wanted in terms of (theoretical) ease of configurability.
How
18 matches
Mail list logo
