Hi, all
I'm using surround query parser.
The request "A B" returns ParseException.
But "A OR B" returns correct results.
I think this is the problem of default query operator.
Anyone know how to set?
Thanks,
Jason
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-set-de
Hello,
I'm using solr 1.4 version.
I want to use some plugin in trunk version.
But I got IndexFormatTooOldException when it run old version index at trunk.
Is there a way using 1.4 index at 4.0 trunk?
Thanks,
Jason
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-there-a-wa
Hi all
Is it possible to use SurroundQParserPlugin in Solr 1.4.0?
if so, how shoud I do it?
Thank in advance
Jason
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/appling-SurroundQParserPlugin-tp3540283p3540283.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.co
Hi all
Nowadays our solr server is frequently down.
Because our user send very long and complex queries with asterisk and near
operator.
Sometimes near operator exceeds 1,000 and keywords almost include asterisk.
If such query is sent to server, jvm memory is full. (our jvm memory
allocates 110G.)
Hi all
We have very complexed queries including wildcard.
That causes memory overhead.
Sometimes, memory is full and server doesn't response.
What I wonder, when query process time on server exceeds the time limit, can
I abort processing query?
If possible, how should I do?
Thanks in advance
Jason
Which one is better performance of setting inOrder=false in solrconfig.xml
and quering with "A B"~1 AND "B A"~1 if performance differences?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-about-near-query-order-tp3427312p3437701.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
Thanks a ton iorixxx.
Jason.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-about-near-query-order-tp3427312p3432922.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thank you for your kind reply.
Is it possible only defType=lucnee in your second suggestion?
I'm using ComplexPhraseQueryParser.
So my defType is "complexphrase".
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-about-near-query-order-tp3427312p3431465.html
Sent fro
"analyze term"~2
"term analyze"~2
In my case, two queries return different result set.
Isn't that in your case?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-about-near-query-order-tp3427312p3429916.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi, all
I have some near query like "analyze term"~2.
That is matched in that order.
But I want to search regardless of order.
So far, I just queried "analyze term"~2 OR "term analyze"~2.
Is there a better way than what i did?
Thanks in advance.
Jason.
--
View this message in context:
http://lu
Hi, Ludovic
That's just what I'm looking for.
You're been a big help.
Thank you so much.
Jason.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Phrase-search-error-tp3423799p3423916.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi, all
When I queried a phrase search "test mp3", I got some error below.
I think that the problem is because of WordDelimiterFilter.
In WordDelimiterFilter 'mp3' is splited pos1:mp, pos2:(3, mp3).
In such a case, the positions of subword and catenateword are incremented.
If this is not phrase se
Hi All
I have complex phrase queries including wildcard.
(ex. q="conn* pho*"~2 OR "inter* pho*"~2 OR ...)
That takes long query result time.
I tried reindex after changing termIndexInterval to 8 for reduce the query
result time through more loading term index info.
I thought if I do so query result
Hi All
I have 5 shards. (sh01 ~ sh05)
I was debugging using solrJ.
When I quiried at each shard, results are right.
But when I quiried at all shards, elementData of SolrDocumentList is null.
But numFound of SolrDocumentList is right.
How can I get the SolrDocumentList in shards?
Thanks in Advance
Hi, Mark
I think FileNotFoundException will be worked around by raise the ulimit.
I just want to know why segments are created more than mergeFactor.
During the googling, I found contents concerning mergeFactor:
http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/bH0vUQzfYcdtZoocG2C9
Yonik wrote:
"mergeFactor
Hi, All
I have 12 shards and ramBufferSizeMB=512, mergeFactor=5.
But solr raise java.io.FileNotFoundException (Too many open files).
mergeFactor is just 5. How can this happen?
Below is segments of some shard. That is too many segments over mergFactor.
What's wrong and How should I set the mergeFa
Thanks to reply, Erick!
Actually, I need sort by score.
I was just curious that seach result without sorting is possible.
Then I found
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/MaxRows-and-disabling-sort-td2260650.html
In above context, Chris Hostetter-3 wrote
Hi, All
I want to get the search result which is not sorted by anything.
Sorting by score take more time.
So, I want to disable sorting by score.
How can i do this?
Thanks, Jason.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/disable-sort-by-score-tp3057767p3057767.html
S
Hi, all
I have two questions.
First,
I'm wondering how filterCache, queryResultCache, documentCache are applied.
After searching query1 OR query2 OR query3 ... , I searched query0 OR
query2 OR query3 ... .
Just query1 and query0 are difference.
But query time was not fast.
When are the caches ap
Hi, iorixxx
I thought that I have to use NGramFilter for wildcard search.
But It was the wrong idea.
Thanks, iorixxx
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/search-problem-after-using-EdgeNGramFilter-tp2060966p2061961.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archiv
I am using EdgeNGramFilter for wildcard search.
But the search result is same whether or not followed by asterisk.
When I search without asterisk, I just want to retrive in original
terms(except ngram terms).
[example]
- doc1 : "enterprise search server"
- doc2 : "enter key"
When I query 'enter*
Hi, all
I want to use both EdegeNGram analysis and phrase search.
But there is some problem.
On Field which is not using EdgeNGram analysis, phrase search.is good work.
But if using EdgeNGram then phrase search is incorrect.
Now I'm using Solr1.4.0.
Result of EdgeNGram analysis for "pci express"
Hi Gora, I really appreciate.
Your reply was a great help to me. :)
I hope everything is fine with you.
Regards,
Jason
Gora Mohanty-3 wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Jason, Kim wrote:
>
> Sorry for the delay in replying. Was caught up in various things this
> we
Thank you for reply, Gora
But I still have several questions.
Did you use separate index?
If so, you indexed 0.7 million Xml files per instance
and merged it. Is it Right?
Please let me know how to work multiple instances and cores in your case.
Regards,
--
View this message in context:
http:/
Hi, Gora
I haven't tried yet indexing huge amount of xml files through curl or pure
java(like a post.jar).
Indexing through xml is really fast?
How many files did you index? And How did it(using curl or pure java)?
Thanks, Gora
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com
Hi all
I have a huge amount of xml files for indexing.
I want to index using solrj binary format to get performance gain.
Because I heard that using xml files to index is quite slow.
But I don't know how to use index through solrj binary format and can't find
examples.
Please give some help.
Thank
Hi, all.
I got some question about solrconfig.xml.
I have 10 fields in a document for index.
(Suppose that field names are f1, f2, ... , f10.)
Some user will want to search in field f1 and f5.
Another user will want to search in field f2, f3 and f7.
I am going to use dismax handler for this.
How
I'd just like to use solr for in-house which is not web application.
But I don't know how should i do?
Thanks,
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-c-s-type-tp1392952p1444175.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
28 matches
Mail list logo