Query field alias - issue with circular reference

So, is there anyway, to extend search query for the existing field without modifying index? -- Jaroslaw Rozanski | m...@jarekrozanski.eu

Contact for Wiki / Support page maintainer

Hi folks! Who is the maintainer of Solr Support page in the Apache Solr Wiki (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Support)? Thanks, Jaroslaw -- Jaroslaw Rozanski | m...@jarekrozanski.eu

deleteById for collection with composite router and routing.field - is this sufficient solution?

der is passed to the replicas. But should it? Is the version always consistent between leader and replica (except for out of sync state)? Thanks, Jaroslaw -- Jaroslaw Rozanski | e: m...@jarekrozanski.eu

CloudSolrClient with implicit route and disable distributed mode routes to unexpected cores

://nodeA/solr/foo - http://nodeB/solr/foo Because in this example shards share physical nodes, sometimes request is routed to core of proper shard, sometimes not. Should the CloudSolrClient resolve exact core URLs when distrib=false? I am guessing yes. -- Jaroslaw Rozanski | e: m...@jarekrozanski.eu

Long value as unique key in long term

olr.html) these are the only option for long types. Short of mapping as "string", is there a long term solution for those who want/need to store unique ID as long? For reference: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10829 Thanks, Jarek -- Jaroslaw Rozanski | e: m...@jarekrozanski.eu

Solr 7.4/7.5 and ZooKeeper version > 3.4.11

noteworthy issues found? The release notes from .11 to .12 look pretty harmless on the face of it. Thanks, Jarek -- Jaroslaw Rozanski | m...@jarekrozanski.eu

Re: Solr cloud inquiry

node with distrib=false flag; that might be more intrusive depending on your shards/data model/queries. And of all suggestions: fix the infrastructure :) Good luck! -- Jaroslaw Rozanski On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, at 00:42, kasinger, james wrote: > Hi, > > We aren’t seeing any exceptions happen

Re: Solr cloud inquiry

e not responding in timely manner due to performance issues but that does not seem to match your case. -- Jaroslaw Rozanski On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, at 22:49, kasinger, james wrote: > Hello folks, > > > > To start, we have a sharded solr cloud configuration running solr version > 5.1.0

Re: Impact of changing precisionStep on already indexed content

Apologies for dup. Please ignore. On 26/05/17 18:00, Jaroslaw Rozanski wrote: > Hi all, > > > What is the impact of changing "precisionStep" without re-indexing > document preceding the change? > > Scenario: > > Assume you have index with field: > >

Impact of changing precisionStep on already indexed content

Hi all, What is the impact of changing "precisionStep" without re-indexing document preceding the change? Scenario: Assume you have index with field: So `tdate` of precision 6. Now let's assume you were to change `tdate` to be of precision 8. According to [1] the change will affect how many

Changing precisionStep without re-indexing

/core/org/apache/lucene/search/NumericRangeQuery.html -- Jaroslaw Rozanski | e: m...@jarekrozanski.com signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Separating Search and Indexing in SolrCloud

's not > true for searching, as you add more docs per node, the > pressure (especially memory) increases. Concentrate > your efforts there IMO. > > Best > Erick > > > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Jaroslaw Rozanski > wrote: >> Hi Erick, >&g

Re: Separating Search and Indexing in SolrCloud

; That said, memory issues are _far_ more prevalent on the search side > of things so unless this is a proven issue in your environment I would > fight other fires. > > Best, > Erick > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Jaroslaw Rozanski > wrote: >> Thanks, tha

Re: Separating Search and Indexing in SolrCloud

oft commits and hence would not be a > good solution for near real time indexing. > > On Dec 16, 2016 7:44 AM, "Jaroslaw Rozanski" wrote: > >> Sorry, not what I meant. >> >> Leader is responsible for distributing update requests to replica. So >> eve

Re: Separating Search and Indexing in SolrCloud

Thanks, On 16/12/16 20:56, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 12/16/2016 5:43 AM, Jaroslaw Rozanski wrote: >> Leader is responsible for distributing update requests to replica. So >> eventually all replicas have same state as leader. Not a problem. It >> is more about the performance

Re: Stable releases of Solr

e version in my codebase from 3.6.1 > What is the latest stable version to which I can upgrade it? > Is 6.3.X stable? > > Thanks, > Deepak > -- Jaroslaw Rozanski | e: m...@jarekrozanski.com 695E 436F A176 4961 7793 5C70 AFDF FB5E 682C 4D3D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Separating Search and Indexing in SolrCloud

es > in other solr/other-dbs. > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Jaroslaw Rozanski > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> According to documentation, in normal operation (not recovery) in Solr >> Cloud configuration the leader sends updates it receives to all the &

Separating Search and Indexing in SolrCloud

search requests to leader, but only to replicas? Given index & search heavy Solr Cloud system, is it possible to separate search from indexing nodes? RE: Solr 5.5.0 -- Jaroslaw Rozanski | e: m...@jarekrozanski.com 695E 436F A176 4961 7793 5C70 AFDF FB5E 682C 4D3D signature.asc Descrip

Re: The state of Solr 5. Is it in maintenance mode only?

have community survey on that subject? That would be really interesting to see. Thanks, Jaroslaw On 28/11/16 12:59, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 11/28/2016 4:29 AM, Jaroslaw Rozanski wrote: >> Recently I have noticed that couple of Solr issues have been >> resolved/added only for S

The state of Solr 5. Is it in maintenance mode only?

so I appreciate its adoption might not be vast. -- Jaroslaw Rozanski | e: m...@jarekrozanski.com signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Dergraded performance between Solr 4 and Solr 5

could be the underlying cause. Thanks, Jarek On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, at 09:13, Jaroslaw Rozanski wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Measuring running queries via JMeter. Values provided are rounded median > of multiple samples. Medians are just slightly better than 99th > percentile for all sam

Re: Dergraded performance between Solr 4 and Solr 5

your first N queries since you're (probably) not getting any benefit > out of caches anyway. > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Jaroslaw Rozanski > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am migrating a large Solr Cloud cluster from Solr 4.10 to Solr 5.5.0 > > a

Dergraded performance between Solr 4 and Solr 5

Hi all, I am migrating a large Solr Cloud cluster from Solr 4.10 to Solr 5.5.0 and I observed big difference in query execution time. First a setup summary: - multiple collections - 6 - each has multiple shards - 6 - same/similar hardware - indexing tens of messages per second - autoSoftCommit

Re: what is opening realtime Searcher

ween T2 and T3, you get > back the updated document, not the doc that was in > the index. So the reatime get is outside the > soft and hard commit issues. > > It's a pretty lightweight operation, no caches are invalidated > or warmed etc. > > Best, > Erick >

what is opening realtime Searcher

Hi, What exactly triggers opening new "realtime" searcher? 2016-04-18_16:28:02.33289 INFO  (qtp1038620625-13) [c:col1 s:shard1 r:core_node3 x:col1_shard1_replica3] o.a.s.s.SolrIndexSearcher Opening Searcher@752e986f[col1_shard1_replica3] realtime I am seeing above being triggered when adding

Re: Verifying - SOLR Cloud replaces load balancer?

Hi, How are you executing searches? I am asking because if you search using Solr client, for example SolrJ - ie. create instance of CloudSolrClient, and not directly via HTTP endpoint, it will provided load-balancing (last time I checked it picks random non-stale node). Thanks, Jarek On Mon,

Re: Adding replica on solr - 5.50

Hi, Does the `&name=...` actually work for you? When attempting similar with Solr 5.3.1, despite what documentation said, I had to use `node_name=...`. Thanks, Jarek On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, at 05:48, John Bickerstaff wrote: > Another thought - again probably not it, but just in case... > > Should