Hi,
I have got a searcher server replicating index from master server. Recently
I have noticed the huge difference in the index size between master and
slave followed by LockObtainFailedException in catalin.out log. When I
debugged the searcher index folder, I could see more that 100 segement_N
fil
ot;jun Wang"
> | To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> | Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:36:09 PM
> | Subject: Re: segment number during optimize of index
> |
> | I have an other question, does the number of segment affect speed for
> | update index?
> |
> | 2012/10/10 jame
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, jame vaalet wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> > I am in a major dilemma with my index now. I have got 8 cores each
> around
> > 300 GB in size and half of them are deleted documents
nsume however.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:08 PM, jame vaalet wrote:
> > hi Shawn,
> > thanks for the detailed explanation.
> > I have got one doubt, you said it doesn matter how many segments index
> have
> > but then why does solr has this
r one?
thanks
.
On 5 October 2012 05:46, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/4/2012 3:22 PM, jame vaalet wrote:
>
>> so imagine i have merged the 150 Gb index into single segment, this would
>> make a single segment of 150 GB in memory. When new docs are indexed it
>> wouldn'
t; as documents are added to the index anyway.
>
> Otis
> --
> Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
> Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:20 PM, jame vaalet wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I was ab
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:14 AM, jame vaalet wrote:
>
> > Thats the first thing i tried, but it had only merge factor and
> > maxmergedocs in it. We have different merge policies like
> > LogMergePolicy<
> >
> http://lucene.apache.org/core/old_versi
re/constant-values.html
On 4 October 2012 18:29, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Look for the word merge in solrconfig.xml :)
>
> Otis
> --
> Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
> On Oct 4, 2012 7:50 AM, "jame vaalet" wrote:
>
> >
hi,
my use case here is to search all the incoming documents for certain
comination of words which are pre-determined. So what am doing here is,
create a batch of x docs according to their creation date, index them,
commit them and search them for query (pre-determined).
My question is, if i have t
es
>
> Best regrads
> Karsten
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:11:49 +0530
> > Von: jame vaalet
> > An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Betreff: indexing key value pair into lucene solr index
>
> > hi,
> > in my use cas
hi,
in my use case i have list of key value pairs in each document object, if i
index them as separate index fields then in the result doc object i will get
two arrays corresponding to my keys and values. The problem i face here is
that there wont be any mapping between those keys and values.
do w
hi,
i was wondering if there is any method to get back the term vector list from
solr through solr.NET?
from the source code for SOLR.NET i couldn't notice any term vector parser
in SOLR.NET .
--
-JAME
docid_ asc to the query? When you say
> "client" I assume you're talking SolrJ, and I'm pretty
> sure that SolrQuery.setSortField is what you want.
>
> I suppose you could also set this as the default in your
> query handler.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tu
okey, so this is something i was looking for .. the default order of result
docs in lucene\solr ..
and you are right, since i don care about the order in which i get the docs
ideally i shouldn't ask solr to do any sorting on its "raw" result list ...
though i understand your point, how do i do it a
thanks hoss... thats a real good explanation ..
well, don care about the sort order i just want all of the docs .. and yes
score values may be duplicated which will deteriorate my search
performance...
before going into lucene doc id , i have got creationDate datetime field in
my index which i can
t;
> What is a higher-level statement of the problem you're trying to solve?
>
> Best
> Erick
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:28 AM, jame vaalet wrote:
> > hi.
> > Is it possible to say fq=score[1 TO *]
> > i have tried but solr is throwing error ? can this be done with some
> other
> > syntax ?
> >
> > --
> >
> > -JAME
> >
>
--
-JAME
hi.
Is it possible to say fq=score[1 TO *]
i have tried but solr is throwing error ? can this be done with some other
syntax ?
--
-JAME
ttp://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching#queryResultWindowSize
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:34 AM, jame vaalet
> wrote:
>
> > wiki says *"size
> >
> > The maximum number of entries in the cache."
> > andqueryResultCache
> >
> > This cache
che.org/solr/SolrCaching
>
> Regards,
>
> Tomás
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:39 AM, jame vaalet wrote:
>
> > hi,
> > i understand that queryResultCache tag in solrconfig is the one which
> > determines the cache size of SOLR in jvm.
> >
> > >
hi,
i understand that queryResultCache tag in solrconfig is the one which
determines the cache size of SOLR in jvm.
out of the different attributes what is size? Is it the amount of memory
reserved in bytes ? or number of doc ids cached ? or is it the number of
queries it will cache?
similarly
gt; solrconfig.xml
> >>
> >> Best
> >> Erick
> >>
> >> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:35 AM, jame vaalet
> wrote:
> >> > thanks erick ... that means it depends upon the memory allocated to
> the
> >> JVM
> >> > .
> &
> and result document IDs. The number of doc IDs cached for
> each query is controlled by queryResultWindowSize in
> solrconfig.xml
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:35 AM, jame vaalet wrote:
> > thanks erick ... that means it depends upon the memory alloca
pages with less overhead.
>
> You pretty much have to try it and see.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 5:42 AM, jame vaalet wrote:
> > speaking about pagesizes, what is the optimum page size that should be
> > retrieved each time ??
> > i understand
her than 100 times (assuming page size is
> 100)...
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:58 AM, jame vaalet
> wrote:
> > when you say queryResultCache, does it only cache n number of result for
> the
> > last one query or more than one queries?
> >
> You can do page-by-page by incrementing the "start" parameter as you
> > indicated.
> >
> > You can keep from re-executing the search by setting your
> queryResultCache
> > appropriately, but this affects all searches so might be an issue.
> >
> > B
instead of one or after first
query the result will be cached somewhere for the subsequent pages ?
JAME VAALET
How do u write solr query to mention proximity between two phrases
dance jockey should appear within 10 words before video jokey
"("dance jockey") ("video jockey")"~10
This isn't working fine . can some one suggest a way ?
-JAME
hi
when u highlight and get back snippet fragments , can you over write the
default hl.regex.pattern through url .
can some quote an example url of that sort ?
what if i make pass hl.slop=0 will this stop considering regex pattern at
all ?
>
--
-JAME
hi,
while searching for word "SOLR" in
"highlighting in solr can be manipulated"
with frag-size =10 .
how is the fragment decided ? how many characters are taken before the world
SOLR and after the word SOLR ?
jame
hi ,
i just wanna be clear in the concepts of core and shard ?
a single core is an index with same schema , is this wat core really is ?
can a single core contain two separate indexes with different schema in it ?
Is a shard refers to a collection of index in a single physical machine
?can a
hi ,
i just wanna be clear in the concepts of core and shard ?
a single core is an index with same schema , is this wat core really is ?
can a single core contain two separate indexes with different schema in it ?
Is a shard refers to a collection of index in a single physical machine
?can a sing
possible. One is any optimizations I should set in
> solrconfig.xml, and the other are the heap/GC settings I should set for
> tomcat. Anything else?
>
> Cheers
>
> François
>
> On Jul 8, 2011, at 4:08 AM, jame vaalet wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > is there any p
hi,
is there any performance degradation (response time etc ) if the index has
document content text stored in it (stored=true)?
-JAME
But incase the website docs contribute around 50 % of the entire docs , why to
recreate the indexes . don't you think its redundancy ?
Can two web apps (solr instances ) share a single index file to search on it
without interfering each other
Regards,
JAME VAALET
Software Developer
EXT
erent core will it solve the problem ?
I have also read about multiple ports for listening request from different apps
, can this be used.
Regards,
JAME VAALET
-Original Message-
From: Pierre GOSSE [mailto:pierre.go...@arisem.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 3:52 PM
To: solr
Thanks.
But does this range query just limit the universe logically or does it have any
mechanism to limit this physically as well .Do we leverage time factor by using
the range query ?
Regards,
JAME VAALET
-Original Message-
From: shashi@gmail.com [mailto:shashi@gmail.com] On
just in this set of documents
rather than the entire index ? if yes what should be query to limit search into
this subset ?
Regards,
JAME VAALET
Software Developer
EXT :8108
Capital IQ
Hi,
What would be the maximum size of a single SOLR index file for resulting in
optimum search time ?
In case I have got to index all the documents in my repository (which is in TB
size) what would be the ideal architecture to follow , distributed SOLR ?
Regards,
JAME VAALET
Software
38 matches
Mail list logo
