Solr 3.1 returning entire highlighted field

Hi, After upgrading from Solr 1.4.0 to 3.1, are highlighting has gone from highlighting short pieces of text to displaying what appears to be the entire contents of the highlighted field. The request using solrj is setting the following: params.setHighlight(true); params.setHighlightSnippets(

RE: [POLL] Where do you get Lucene/Solr from? Maven? ASF Mirrors?

[] ASF Mirrors (linked in our release announcements or via the Lucene website) [X] Maven repository (whether you use Maven, Ant+Ivy, Buildr, etc.) [] I/we build them from source via an SVN/Git checkout. [] Other (someone in your company mirrors them internally or via a downstream project) --

backup command

Hi, I'm running the official Solr 1.4 release and encountering an exception and told that a file does not exist when using the java replication command=backup. It looks very much like SOLR-1475 which was fixed for 1.4. I tried adding a deletionPolicy within solrconfig.xml to keep commit points

StreamingUpdateSolrServer seems to hang on indexing big batches

Hi, I swapped our indexing process over to the streaming update server, but now I'm seeing places where our indexing code adds several documents, but eventually hangs. It hangs just before the completion message, which comes directly after sending to solr. I found this issue in jira https://is

RE: Corrupted Index

, at 3:08 PM, Jake Brownell wrote: > Hi all, > > Our application uses solrj to communicate with our solr servers. We > started a fresh index yesterday after upping the maxFieldLength > setting in solrconfig. Our task indexes content in batches and all > appeared to be well u

Corrupted Index

Hi all, Our application uses solrj to communicate with our solr servers. We started a fresh index yesterday after upping the maxFieldLength setting in solrconfig. Our task indexes content in batches and all appeared to be well until noonish today, when after 40k docs, I started seeing errors. I

RE: Is there a way to skip cache for a query

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1363 -- it's currently scheduled for 1.5. Jake -Original Message- From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 11:17 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Is there a way to skip cache

NPE when trying to view a specific document via Luke

Hi, I'm seeing this stack trace when I try to view a specific document, e.g. /admin/luke?id=1 but luke appears to be working correctly when I just view /admin/luke. Does this look familiar to anyone? Our sysadmin just upgraded us to the 1.4 release, I'm not sure if this occurred before that.

Field settings for best highlighting performance

Hi, I've seen the use case for highlighting on: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase I just wanted to confirm that for best performance Indexed=true Stored=true termVectors=true termPositions=true is the way to go for highlighting for Solr 1.4. Note that I'm not doing anything el

RE: Highlighting performance between 1.3 and 1.4rc

will not get correct phrase highlighting and multi term queries won't highlight - eg prefix/ wildcard/range. - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile) On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:18 PM, Jake Brownell wrote: > Hi, > > The fix MarkM provided yesterday for the problem I reported

Highlighting performance between 1.3 and 1.4rc

Hi, The fix MarkM provided yesterday for the problem I reported encountering with the highlighter appears to be working--I installed the Lucene 2.9.1 rc4 artifacts. Now I'm running into an oddity regarding performance. Our integration test is running slower than it used to. I've placed some av

highlighting error using 1.4rc

Hi, I've tried installing the latest (3rd) RC for Solr 1.4 and Lucene 2.9.1. One of our integration tests, which runs against and embedded server appears to be failing on highlighting. I've included the stack trace and the configuration from solrconf. I'd appreciate any insights. Please let me