Re: Error "unexpected docvalues type NUMERIC for field" using rord() function query on single valued int field

Hello, We've figured out a workaround for this, using another field that's multivalued and populated with , and using that field in the rord() function query. Nevertheless, this feels like a bug to me. Bye, Jaco. On 23 November 2016 at 09:04, Jaco de Vroed wrote: > Hi, > &g

Re: Error "unexpected docvalues type NUMERIC for field" using rord() function query on single valued int field

Hi, No, I reproduced the original issue, with the rord() function, on a brand new index with docValues=true, with just one doc indexed in it. Any clues? Thanks, Jaco. On 21 November 2016 at 15:06, Pushkar Raste wrote: > Did you turn on/off docValues on a already existing field? > &g

Re: Error "unexpected docvalues type NUMERIC for field" using rord() function query on single valued int field

Hi, I made a typo. The Solr version number in which this error occurs is 5.5.3. I also checked 6.3.0, same problem. Thanks, bye, Jaco. On 16 November 2016 at 17:39, Jaco de Vroed wrote: > Hello Solr users, > > I’m running into an error situation using Solr 5.3.3. The case is as >

Error "unexpected docvalues type NUMERIC for field" using rord() function query on single valued int field

exact same error is in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7495 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7495>, but that is a different case. I can create a JIRA issue for this of course, but first wanted to throw this at the mailing list to see if there’s any insights that can be shared. T

Solr 3.5 MoreLikeThis on Date fields

or.java:857) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:588) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:489) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Sincerely, Jaco Olivier Please note: Th

Solr and Lucene in South Africa

share some triumphs and pitfalls that were experienced. * Sorry for hogging the User Mailing list on non-technical question, but think this is the easiest way to get it done :) Jaco Olivier Web Specialist Please note: This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer as displayed at the

Re: Good literature on search basics

See http://markmail.org/thread/z5sq2jr2a6eayth4 On 12 February 2010 12:14, javaxmlsoapdev wrote: > > Does anyone know good literature(web resources, books etc) on basics of > search? I do have Solr 1.4 and Lucene books but wanted to go in more > details > on basics. > > Thanks, > -- > View this

RE: do copyField's need to exist as Fields?

1.4 Book.. It really saved me a 1000 questions on this mailing list :) Jaco Olivier -Original Message- From: regany [mailto:re...@newzealand.co.nz] Sent: 09 December 2009 00:48 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: do copyField's need to exist as Fields? regany wrote: &g

RE: why no results?

Hi, Try changing your TEXT field to type "text" (without the of course :)) That is your problem... also use the "text" type as per default examples with SOLR distro :) Jaco Olivier -Original Message- From: regany [mailto:re...@newzealand.co.nz] Sent:

RE: why no results?

ld be fine. Jaco Olivier -Original Message- From: regany [mailto:re...@newzealand.co.nz] Sent: 08 December 2009 06:15 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: why no results? Tom Hill-7 wrote: > > Try solr.TextField inst

Re: Highlighting is very slow

Hi, We had a similar case once (although not with those really long response times). Fixed by moving to JRE 1.6 and tuning garbage collection. Bye, Jaco. 2009/11/3 Andrew Clegg > > Hi everyone, > > I'm experimenting with highlighting for the first time, and it seems >

Nested phrases with proximity in Solr

ybody? Thanks in advance, bye, Jaco.

Re: Solr Replication on Windows

Hi, In my experience, you can just migrate to 1.4. We are using this in production without any problems, and the Java Replication ( http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication) works excellent. Bye, Jaco. 2009/6/17 vaibhav joshi > > Hi, > > I am using Solr 1.3 release and have d

Re: Who is running 1.4 nightly in production?

Running 1.4 nightly in production as well, also for the Java replication and for the improved facet count algorithms. No problems, all running smoothly. Bye, Jaco. 2009/5/13 Erik Hatcher > We run a not too distant trunk (1.4, probably a month or so ago) version of > Solr on LucidFind a

Re: Dictionary lookup possibilities

Hi, Thanks for the suggestions! It looks like the MemoryIndex is worth having a detailed look at, so that's what I'll start on. Thanks again, bye, Jaco. 2009/4/17 Steven A Rowe > Hi Jaco, > > On 4/9/2009 at 2:58 PM, Jaco wrote: > > I'm struggling with some ide

Dictionary lookup possibilities

e' matches, but I am looking for a more efficient way. Is there a way to do this with Solr functionality, or do I need to start looking into the Lucene API ..? Any help would be much appreciated as usual! Thanks, bye, Jaco.

Re: Size of my index directory increase considerably

Hi, After installing that patch, all is running fine for me as well - problem no longer occurring and replication running great! The issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-978 has already been committed, so it's also there in the 1.4 nightly builds. Bye, Jaco. 2009/3/26 su

Re: Solr Replication: disk space consumed on slave much higher than on master

Hi Noble, Great stuff, no problem, I really think the Solr development team is excellent and takes pride in delivering high quality software! And we're going into production with a brand new Solr based system in a few weeks as well, so I'm really happy that this is fixed now. Bye, J

Re: Solr Replication: disk space consumed on slave much higher than on master

ually need much, much more patience with commercial software vendors.. Cheers, Jaco. 2009/1/23 Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् > I have opened an issue to track this > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-978 > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् >

Re: Solr Replication: disk space consumed on slave much higher than on master

master's index directory) - The directories index.x are still there after replication, but they are empty Are there any other things I can do check, or more info that I can provide to help fix this? Thanks, bye, Jaco. 2009/1/22 Shalin Shekhar Mangar > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12

Re: Solr Replication: disk space consumed on slave much higher than on master

, Jaoc. 2009/1/21 Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Jaco wrote: > > Thanks for the fast replies! > > > > It appears that I made a (probably classical) error... I didnt' make the > > change to solrconfig.xml to include the when applyi

Re: Solr Replication: disk space consumed on slave much higher than on master

User access rights for the user are OK, this use is allowed to do anything in the Solr data directory (Tomcat service is running from SYSTEM account (Windows)). Thanks, regards, Jaco. 2009/1/21 Shalin Shekhar Mangar > Hi, > > There shouldn't be so many files on the sla

Solr Replication: disk space consumed on slave much higher than on master

n 138 files - Slave: 152 GB in 3,941 files Can anybody tell me what to do to prevent this from happening, and how to clean up the slave? Also, there are quite some empty index.xxx directories sitting in the slaves data dir. Can these be safely removed? Thanks a lot in advance, bye, Jaco.

Re: "Unable to move index file" error during replication

Very good! I applied the patch in the attached file, working fine now. I'll keep monitoring and post any issues found. Will this be included in some next nightly build? Thanks very much for the very quick response! Jaco. 2008/12/24 Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् > James thanks . > &

"Unable to move index file" error during replication

there was some problem with disk space, but this is not the case. Replication did run fine for intial version of index, but after that at some point it didn't work anymore. Any ideas what could be wrong here? Thanks very much in advance, bye, Jaco.

Re: Preferred Tomcat version on Windows 2003 (64 bits)

Thanks for the fast reply! I've tested SOLR-561, and it is working beautifully! Excellent functionality. Cheers, Jaco. 2008/11/6 Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I don't think there are preferences. If going with the brand new setup why > not go with Tomcat 6.0. &

Preferred Tomcat version on Windows 2003 (64 bits)

Hello, I am planning a brand new environment for Solr running on a Windows 2003 Server 64 bits platform. I want to use Tomcat, and was wondering whether there is any preference in general for using Tomcat 5.5 or Tomcat 6.0 with Solr. Any suggestions would be appreciated! Thanks, bye, Jaco.

Distributed search, standard request handler and more like this

he q= query. The same query without shards= does return moreLiekThis results. Am I doing something wrong or is this not yet supported..? Thanks, bye, Jaco.

Re: Search by example

Hi, This can be done with 'more like this' functionality in Solr: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThis Bye, Jaco. 2008/10/29 Marian Steinbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi! > > Out of curiosity: How would one implement "search by example" with Solr? >

Re: Integrating external stemmer in Solr and pre-processing text

} return null; } } This will need some work and additional error checking, and I'll probably put a maximum om the number of tokens that is to be processed in one go to make sure things don't get too big in memory. Thanks for helping out! Bye, Jaco. 2008/9/26 Jaco

Re: Integrating external stemmer in Solr and pre-processing text

Thanks for these suggestions, will try it in the coming days and post my findings in this thread. Bye, Jaco. 2008/9/26 Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Sep 26, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Jaco wrote: > > Hi Grant, >> >> In reply to your questions: >

Re: Integrating external stemmer in Solr and pre-processing text

call instead of token-by-token (also tried this in another environment (perl), which gave the same result). So I guess I'll need to do this with the other approach I suggested. Bye, Jaco. 2008/9/26 Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > : It is invoking a COM object in Windo

Re: Integrating external stemmer in Solr and pre-processing text

ther processing Would this work in Solr? I can do some Java coding to achieve that from logical point of view, but I wouldn't know how to structure this flow into the MyTokenizerFactory, so some hints to achieve that would be great! Thanks for helping out! Jaco. 2008/9/26 Grant Ingersoll <

Re: Integrating external stemmer in Solr and pre-processing text

source text is tokenized. Any suggestions would be very welcome... Cheers, Jaco. 2008/9/26 Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > How are you creating the tokens? What are you setting for the offsets and > the positions? > > One thing that is helpful is Solr's built in A

Integrating external stemmer in Solr and pre-processing text

text to be processed before it's tokenized. Maybe my second scenario does not make sense at all..? Any ideas on how to overcome this or any other suggestions on how to realise this? Thanks, bye, Jaco. PS I posted this message twice before but it didn't come through (spam filtering..??), so

Pre-processing text in custom FilterFactory / TokenizerFactory

get messed up then). Maybe my second scenario is totally insane? Any ideas on how to overcome this or any other suggestions on how to realise this? Cheers, Jaco. PS I posted this message yesterday, but it didn't come through, so this is the 2nd try..

Pre-processing text in custom FilterFactory / TokenizerFactory

s? Cheers, Jaco.

Distributed search and facet counts using facet.limit=-1

lt; my facet field >>&shards=localhost:8080/solr Am I possibly doing something wrong or is this a bug? Bye, Jaco.

Re: scoring individual values in a multivalued field

Hi, I ran into the same problem some time ago, couldn't find any relation to the boost values on the multivalued field and the search results. Does anybody have an idea how to handle this? Thanks, Jaco. 2008/8/29 Sébastien Rainville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi, > > I have

Re: Beginners question: adding a plugin

That does the trick! Thanks for the quick reply (and for a great Solr product!) Bye, Jaco. 2008/8/27 Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Instead of solr.TestStemFilterFactory, put the fully qualified classname > for the TestStemFilterFactory, i.e. > com.my.great.stemmer.TestSt

Beginners question: adding a plugin

...> Probably some configuration issue somewhere, but I am in the dark here (as said: not a Java expert...). I've tried to find information in mailing list archives on this, but no luck so far. I'm Running Solr nightly build of 20.08.2008, tomcat 5.5.26 on Windows. Any help would be much appreciated! Cheers, Jaco.