Hi all,
This release contains a critical bug, that should be fixed in 8.8.1
shortly. Please avoid upgrading to this release for the moment.
https://twitter.com/ichattopadhyaya/status/1360163382171586562
Apologies for the inconvenience.
Thanks,
Ishan
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 6:01 PM Noble Paul wrote
Just avoid 8.8.0 for the moment, until 8.8.1 is released. 8.7.x should be
fine.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:28 PM Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
> Hi,
> following up on Charlie's detailed response I would recommend carefully
> assess the code you are using to interact with Apache Solr (on top of the
Recent versions of Solr use 2048.
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/branch_8_6/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/CryptoKeys.java#L332
Thanks for your report.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 3:44 PM Mahir Kabir wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a Ph.D. student at Virginia Tech, USA. While working
This should be fixed now in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15136.
Thanks Markus.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 7:33 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we should release a 8.8.1 with that fixed.
>
> On Fri, 5 Feb, 2021, 4:09 pm Markus J
No, it is not ASF slack. A separate slack org, just for Solr.
On Sat, 6 Feb, 2021, 6:35 am Anshum Gupta, wrote:
> Hey Ishan,
>
> Thanks for doing this. Is this the ASF Slack space or something else?
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 2:04 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattop
I think we should release a 8.8.1 with that fixed.
On Fri, 5 Feb, 2021, 4:09 pm Markus Jelsma,
wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Op do 4 feb. 2021 om 20:04 schreef Chris Hostetter <
> hossman_luc...@fucit.org
> >:
>
> >
> > FWIW: that log message was added to branch_8x by 3c02c9197376 as part of
> > SOLR-150
uston Putman
> wrote:
>
> > There is https://solr-dev.slack.com
> >
> > It's not really used, but it's there and we can open it up for people to
> > join and start using.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 5:38 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> > ich
Thanks ufuk. I'll take a look.
On Tue, 26 Jan, 2021, 4:05 pm ufuk yılmaz,
wrote:
> It’s asking for a searchscale.com email address?
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
> From: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Sent: 26 January 2021 13:33
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: Solr S
We should update the official documentation for community page to include
this Slack org. If someone would like to volunteer to submit a patch
against lucene-site repo, would be great.
On Tue, 26 Jan, 2021, 4:02 pm Ishan Chattopadhyaya, <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There i
There is a Slack backed by official IRC support. Please see
https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Users-Slack-td4466856.html for
details on how to join it.
On Tue, 19 Jan, 2021, 2:54 pm Charlie Hull,
wrote:
> Relevance Slack is open to anyone working on search & relevance - #solr is
> only on
I think this warrants a JIRA. To work around this issue for now, you can
use an environment variable SOLR_SECURITY_MANAGER_ENABLED=false before
starting Solr.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 11:58 PM Jörn Franke wrote:
> The solution would be probably a policy file shipped with Solr that allows
> the ZK
Try using haveged for your entropy problem.
On Thu, 16 Jul, 2020, 10:20 pm Walter Underwood,
wrote:
> Instead of editing bin/solr, you should be able to set GC_TUNE in
> solr.in.sh, as I showed in my post below.
>
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wunderwood.org
> http://observer.wunderwood.o
> I hear all of that and agree, obviously, but "curl
> solr:8983/collection/dataimport?blah" in cron was *pretty freaking
> easy* ;)
>
> Not sure why "pull" is elevated to "anti-pattern"; data is data is data
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 8:49 PM
Hi Solr Users,
Here is a list of recent and upcoming deprecations in Solr 8.x.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Deprecations
Please feel free to chime in if you have any questions. You can comment
here or in the specific JIRA issues.
Thanks and regards,
Ishan Chattopadhyaya
FYI, CDCR support, as it exists in Solr today, has been deprecated in 8.6.
It suffers from serious design flaws and it allows such things to happen
that you observe. While there may be workarounds, it is advisable to not
rely on CDCR in production.
Thanks,
Ishan
On Thu, 2 Jul, 2020, 1:12 am Oakle
ion on this,
please start another thread in solr-users@ list, and more people can
suggest best alternatives here.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 5:50 AM matthew sporleder
wrote:
> Is there a replacement for DIH?
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:08 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> wrote:
> >
On Wed, 15 Jul, 2020, 8:37 pm Bernd Fehling,
wrote:
>
>
> Am 15.07.20 um 16:07 schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya:
> > Dear Solr Users,
> >
> > In this release (Solr 8.6), we have deprecated the following:
> >
> > 1. Data Import Handler
> >
> &g
easier for users to use such features.
Regards,
Ishan Chattopadhyaya
(On behalf of the Apache Lucene/Solr PMC)
[0] -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Community+supported+packages+for+Solr
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:30 PM Bruno Roustant
wrote:
> The Lucene PMC is pleased
to go
away. Of course, provided all usecases that could be solved using
standalone can also be solved using SolrCloud. At that point, I'd love for
us to get rid of the term "SolrCloud".
On Sun, 28 Jun, 2020, 3:59 pm Ishan Chattopadhyaya, <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
mething other than Solr (or fork and go their own
> way).
>
> Ilan
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 9:39 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Rather than getting rid of the terminology, we should get rid of the
> > standalone mode Sol
Rather than getting rid of the terminology, we should get rid of the
standalone mode Solr altogether. I totally understand that SolrCloud is
broken in many ways today, but we should attempt to fix it and have it as
the only mode in Solr.
On Wed, 24 Jun, 2020, 8:17 pm Mike Drob, wrote:
> Brend,
>
This is a problem, indeed. I've opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14491 to address this.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:08 PM mosheB wrote:
> We are using Solr's kerberos authentication plugin and we are trying to
> implement field-level filtering based on the authenticated user and
>
## 13 January 2020, Apache Solr™ 8.4.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.4.1.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, fac
13971 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13971>:
> > Velocity
> > > >> response writer's resource loading now possible only through startup
> > > >> parameters.
> > > >>
> > > >> Is it linked appropriately? Or is i
## 3 December 2019, Apache Solr™ 8.3.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.3.1.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, fac
## 2 November 2019, Apache Solr™ 8.3.0 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.3.0.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, fac
iderations by other
> people.
>
> > Am 16.05.2019 um 11:55 schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> > :
> >
> > Does this warrant a 8.1.1 release? I think this is serious enough.
> >
> >> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:03 PM Jörn Franke wrote:
> >
Does this warrant a 8.1.1 release? I think this is serious enough.
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:03 PM Jörn Franke wrote:
>
> SOLR-13475
>
> > Am 16.05.2019 um 05:24 schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> > :
> >
> > Please open a JIRA.
> >
> >> O
= 16 March 2019, Apache Solr™ 8.1.0 available =
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.1.0
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, facet
Please open a JIRA.
On Thu, 16 May, 2019, 8:09 AM Jörn Franke, wrote:
> Sorry autocorrection. It is not only a admin UI issue. I described in my
> previous email that access through the collection alias does not work. I
> cannot even do execute the select query handler if I use the collection
>
Thanks Jörn for reporting this. Sounds like some backward comparability
break with aliases. Can you please open a JIRA? I'll take a look at
reproducing it soon.
On Wed, 15 May, 2019, 7:18 PM Mikhail Khludnev, wrote:
> It seems creating alias in Solr Admin UI is broken. It's a minor issue for
> 8
This fix has also been backported to Solr 6.6.6 for users who are
stuck with Solr 6.x.
(Sorry, I hadn't updated the issue and hence this was missed in the
original mail.)
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:35 PM Noble Paul wrote:
>
> CVE-2018-11802: Apache Solr authorization bug disclosure
> Severity: I
5 April 2019, Apache Solr™ 6.6.6 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.6.6.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the
Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search,
hit highlighting, faceted s
1 March 2019, Apache Solr™ 7.7.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 7.7.1
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the
Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search,
hit highlighting, faceted se
1 March 2019, Apache Solr™ 7.7.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 7.7.1
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the
Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search,
hit highlighting, faceted se
1 March 2019, Apache Solr™ 7.7.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 7.7.1
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the
Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search,
hit highlighting, faceted se
03 July 2018, Apache Solr™ 6.6.5 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.6.5
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted se
3 July 2018, Apache Lucene™ 6.6.5 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 6.6.5.
Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine
library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly
any application that requires full-t
18 May 2018, Apache Solr™ 6.6.4 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.6.4
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted sea
18 May 2018, Apache Solr™ 6.6.4 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.6.4
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted sea
You can now access them. Thanks for your patience and understanding.
On 18 Oct 2017 3:15 pm, "Ishan Chattopadhyaya"
wrote:
> Hi Bernd,
>
> > I get something like "permissionViolation=true", even after login!!!
> This is due to the security sensitive nature
There will be a 5.5.5 release soon. 6.6.2 has just been released.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Keith L wrote:
> Additionally, it looks like the commits are public on github. Is this
> backported to 5.5.x too? Users that are still on 5x might want to backport
> some of the issues themselves s
we have to pay for seeing the issues? ;-)
>
> Regards
> Bernd
>
>
> Am 18.10.2017 um 10:29 schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya:
> > 18 October 2017, Apache Solr™ 6.6.2 available
> >
> > The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.6.2
> >
>
18 October 2017, Apache Solr™ 6.6.2 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.6.2
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the
Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search,
hit highlighting, faceted
> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
>
>
> On 7 June 2017 at 10:40, Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> wrote:
> > 6 June 2017, Apache Solr 6.6.0 availableSolr is the popular, blazing
> > fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache
6 June 2017, Apache Solr 6.6.0 available
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted search and analytics, rich document
parsing, geospatial search, extensive RE
6 June 2017, Apache Solr 6.6.0 availableSolr is the popular, blazing
fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene
project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit
highlighting, faceted search and analytics, rich document parsing,
geospatial search, extensive REST
> Hmm, interesting. I can imagine that as long as you're updating
> docValues fields, the other_text field would be there. But the instant
> you updated a non-docValues field (text_field in your example) the
> other_text field would disappear
I can confirm this. When in-place updates to DV fields
Why are you adding these update processors (esp. the
AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor) after DistributedUpdateProcessor? Try
adding them before DUP, and it has a better chance to work.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Pratik Thaker <
pratik.tha...@smartstreamrdu.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am facin
> I use SolrJ 6.4.0 and SolrCloud 6.4.0
Please upgrade to 6.4.2 immediately. 6.4.0 has major performance problems.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Mikhail Ibraheem <
mikhail.ibrah...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Thanks Shawn so much.
> I use SolrJ 6.4.0 and SolrCloud 6.4.0
> The code is very simple:
>
> For in-place updates, the documentation states that only the fields being
> modified are updated, but does that mean that all other fields don't need
> to be stored?
Correct, in general there's no need to store the other fields. However,
there's a niche case where if a simultaneous DeleteByQuery
Hi Bernd,
Can you please double check?
I downloaded the 6.4.2 tarball and see that they have 6.4.2:
[ishan@ishanvps solr-6.4.2]$ grep -rn "luceneMatchVersion" *|grep
solrconfig.xml
CHANGES.txt:1474: or
your luceneMatchVersion in the solrconfig.xml is less than 6.0
docs/changes/Changes.html:1694
7 March 2017, Apache Solr 6.4.2 available
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted search and analytics, rich document
parsing, geospatial search, extensive R
Maybe do an "inc" of 0 to a numeric field for every document.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Updating+Parts+of+Documents
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Dorian Hoxha
wrote:
> Hello searcherers,
>
> So, I have document that is fully stored. Then I make small change in
> schema.
http://home.apache.org/~ctargett/RefGuidePOC/jekyll-full/adding-custom-plugins-in-solrcloud-mode.html
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:23 PM, John Bickerstaff
wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm looking for information on writing custom Solr components. A quick
> search showed nothing really recent and before I dig
Hi Mohsin,
There's some work in progress for in-place updates to docValued fields,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944. Can you try the latest
patch there (or ping me if you need a git branch)?
It would be nice to know how fast the updates go for your usecase with that
patch. Please not
This appears to be Cloudera search specific. The kerberos support in Solr
is similar to, but not identical with, the kerberos support in Cloudera's
Search. Maybe you could check with Cloudera's support?
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/12/2016 4:28 AM, vidya wrote:
>
Perhaps you could stay on 5.4.1 RC2, since that is what 5.4.1 will be
(unless there are last moment issues).
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Michael Joyner wrote:
> Unfortunately, it really couldn't wait.
>
> I did a rolling upgrade to the 5.4.1RC2 then downgraded everything to
> 5.4.0 and so f
Not sure how reliably renewals are taken care of in the context of
kerberized HDFS, but here's my 10-15 minute analysis.
Seems to me that the auto renewal thread is not spawned [0]. This relies on
kinit.
Not sure if having a login configuration with renewTGT is sufficient (which
seems to be passed
Maybe, you could have a look at REBALANCELEADERS to see if this solves your
usecase?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collections+API#CollectionsAPI-RebalanceLeaders
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 3:54 PM, wrote:
> Hi guys ,
> i have a solr cluster of 3 nodes using solr cloud , and a co
Hi Daniel,
That sounds good. It is a custom solution, which is a way to secure just
about any server. I think Noble's point was about out of the box, community
supported, way of securing Solr.
Regards,
Ishan
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] <
daniel.da...@nih.gov> wrote
t; >
> > 2015-12-09 23:00 GMT+00:00 kostali hassan :
> >
> >> -- Message transféré --
> >> De : "Ishan Chattopadhyaya"
> >> Date : 9 déc. 2015 19:39
> >> Objet : Re: secure solr 5.3.1
> >> À :
> >>
e the Windows host is able to access the ports of the
guest machine. Better still, setup GNU/Linux VMs for Solr too.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:39 AM, kostali hassan
wrote:
> I install MIT Kerberos for Windows 4.0.1
>
> 2015-12-09 19:05 GMT+00:00 Ishan Chattopadhyaya >:
>
>
Alternatively, you could also try using BasicAuth, which doesn't require
this additional setup of a KDC.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't have much personal experience with setting up a kerberos server on
>
AM, kostali hassan
wrote:
> I folow this two resources and Iam stuck in
>
>- Create service principals and keytab files.
>
>
> 2015-12-09 18:06 GMT+00:00 Ishan Chattopadhyaya >:
>
> > The kerberos plugin is available for use with Solr out of the box. The
&
Solr to use Kerberos ? i have to dowload kerberos and put
> >the plug-in implementation in the classpath(/server/solr).
> >
> >2015-12-08 22:19 GMT+00:00 Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Right, as Bosco said, this has been
Right, as Bosco said, this has been tested well and supported on SolrCloud.
It should be possible to run it in standalone mode, but it is not something
that has been well test yet.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Don Bosco Durai wrote:
> It was tested and meant to work only in SolrCloud mode.
>
At the moment, the Basic Authentication doesn't work with standalone Solr
(non-SolrCloud). Kerberos authentication works.
If you want support for Basic Authentication for standalone Solr, please
feel free to open a JIRA and contribute a patch.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Dominique Bejean wro
FYI,
http://lucidworks.com/blog/2015/08/17/securing-solr-basic-auth-permission-rules/
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Byzen Ma wrote:
> Hi, I'm not quite familar with security.json. I want to achieve these
> implementations. (1)Anyone who wants to do read/select/query action should
> be require
As I see things, if you're using Basic Authentication and/or Rule Based
Authorization, then the security.json could be copied over to start things.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] <
craig.oak...@nih.gov> wrote:
> Looking through
> cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displ
Also, what are the specific performance issues you are observing?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> Just to be sure, are you installing Solr inside a different Jetty, or
> using the Jetty that comes with Solr?
>
> You would be expected to use the one installed and managed by So
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> I see your point. In the custom routing case where it _is_ reasonable
> to delete all replicas in a shard, DELETESHARD does the trick.
>
> It's reasonable to raise a JIRA I think so we have a record of the
> discussion/decision.
>
There is
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> > Is there a decent API for getting uniqueKey?
>
> Not off the top of my head.
> I deeply regret making it configurable and not just using "id" ;-)
>
Maybe this?
https://cwiki.apache.or
In latest Solr release, you can use the basic auth plugins for
authentication instead of doing something at the Jetty level.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Basic+Authentication+Plugin
Right at the end, there's a note on how to use SolrJ with this.
Also, there exists: https://issu
There's also a function, exists(), which might work here, and result in a
neater query.
e.g. something like: q=*:* -exists(usrlatlong_0_coordinate)
Haven't tried it, though.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Function+Queries#FunctionQueries-AvailableFunctions
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at
+1, I agree. Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8099
Thanks,
Ishan
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> Relevant code
>
> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.apache.solr/solr-core/5.2.0/org/apache/solr/search
Hi A.Nazemian,
Thanks for your findings. I think I was able to reproduce what you
reported. Please have a look at the tests for SOLR-6596 and add your
comments there. :-)
Regards,
Ishan
> Did anybody test that?
> Best regards.
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Ali Nazemian
> wrote:
>> I also c
77 matches
Mail list logo
