Solr more straightforward.
--
Henrik Ossipoff Hansen
On 1. dec. 2013 at 02.06.54, subacini Arunkumar
(subac...@gmail.com<mailto://subac...@gmail.com>) wrote:
Thanks Walter for the reply. Here is my complete requirement.
Please let me know the possible solutions to address my requi
(that, and
one developer had previous experience with Tomcat configuration).
--
Henrik Ossipoff Hansen
Developer, Entertainment Trading
On 12. nov. 2013 at 15.45.42, Hoggarth, Gil
(gil.hogga...@bl.uk<mailto://gil.hogga...@bl.uk>) wrote:
For me, a side-affect of 'example' is tha
.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-never-fully-recovers-after-slow-disks-td4099350.html
--
Henrik Ossipoff Hansen
Developer, Entertainment Trading
On 12. nov. 2013 at 09.47.01, Martin de Vries
(mar...@downnotifier.com<mailto://mar...@downnotifier.com>) wrote:
Hi,
We have:
Solr 4.5.1 - 5 serv
- which is fairly high - everything else is
running like normal at this point.
--
Henrik Ossipoff Hansen
Developer, Entertainment Trading
On 11. nov. 2013 at 16.01.58, Mark Miller
(markrmil...@gmail.com<mailto://markrmil...@gmail.com>) wrote:
The socket read timeouts are actually fairly
Ossipoff Hansen
Developer, Entertainment Trading
On 10. nov. 2013 at 21.07.32, Henrik Ossipoff Hansen
(h...@entertainment-trading.com<mailto://h...@entertainment-trading.com>) wrote:
Solr version is 4.5.0.
I have done some tweaking. Doubling my Zookeeper timeout values in zoo.cfg and
the Zoo
: Re: SolrCloud never fully recovers after slow disks
Which version of solr are you using? Regardless of your env, this is a fail
safe that you should not hit.
- Mark
> On Nov 5, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Henrik Ossipoff Hansen
> wrote:
>
> I previously made a post on this, but have since
hardware setup.
Thank you for your post - I will make another post in a day or two after I see
how it performs.
--
Henrik Ossipoff Hansen
Developer, Entertainment Trading
On 7. nov. 2013 at 13.23.59, Erick Erickson
(erickerick...@gmail.com<mailto://erickerick...@gmail.com>) wrote:
Right, can
ick fix in our case). Shouldn’t a setup like this be
possible? And even more so - shouldn’t SolrCloud be able to gracefully recover
after issues like this?
--
Henrik Ossipoff Hansen
Developer, Entertainment Trading
I realise now that distributed pivotal faceting is not implemented yet in
SolrCloud after some digging through the internet.
Apologies :)
Den 21/10/2013 kl. 18.20 skrev Henrik Ossipoff Hansen
:
> Hello,
>
> We have a rather weird behavior I don't really understand. As writt
Hello,
We have a rather weird behavior I don't really understand. As written in a few
other threads, we're migrating from a master/slave setup running 4.3 to a
SolrCloud setup running 4.5. Both run on the same data set (the 4.5 instances
have been re-indexed under 4.5 obviously).
The following
I did not actually realize this, I apologize for my previous reply!
Haproxy would definitely be the right choice then for the posters setup for
redundancy.
Den 16/10/2013 kl. 15.53 skrev Shawn Heisey :
> On 10/16/2013 3:52 AM, michael.boom wrote:
>> I have setup a SolrCloud system with: 3 shard
What you could do (and what we do) is to have a simple proxy in front of your
Solr instances. We for example run with Nginx in front of all of our Tomcats,
and use Nginx's upstream capabilities to do a simple loadbalancer for our
SolrCloud cluster.
http://wiki.nginx.org/HttpUpstreamModule
I'm
We're in the process of moving onto SolrCloud, and have gotten to the point
where we are considering how to do our hardware setup.
We're limited to VMs running on our server cluster and storage system, so
buying new physical servers is out of the question - the question is how we
should dimensi
We are slowly starting to move from a Master/slave setup into SolrCloud, and
with the addition some new functionality on our site, we decided to give it a
go in production (with a very minimal setup so far).
We are experiencing that our nodes looses connection to ZK during the night
according t
ty of nature that keeps events from happening all at once.
Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Henrik Ossipoff Hansen <
h...@entertainment-trading.com> wrote:
> Hello, first time writing to the list. I am a deve
quot;.
When displaying the facet we split the facet value from Solr in half and
display the second half to the user.
Of course the caveat is that you could have 2 facets that differ only in case,
but to me that's a data cleansing issue.
James
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Ossipoff H
-Original Message-----
From: Henrik Ossipoff Hansen [mailto:h...@entertainment-trading.com]
Sent: 15 July 2013 15:08
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Facet sorting seems weird
Hello, first time writing to the list. I am a developer for a company where we
recently switched all of
Hello, first time writing to the list. I am a developer for a company where we
recently switched all of our search core from Sphinx to Solr with very great
results. In general we've been very happy with the switch, and everything seems
to work just as we want it to.
Today however we've run into
18 matches
Mail list logo