;
do not work (returning zero documents) when the doc ref is in the format
IAE_UPC_0001 (ie using the underscore character as the delimiter).
I'm assuming the underscore is a special character but have tried looking
at the solr wiki but can't find anything to say what the problem is
Except if I missed it, nobody yet pointed to
http://solr-vs-elasticsearch.com/
which seems to be fairly up-to-date.
As for performance, I would expect that it is very hard to find one of
the two technologies to be generally ahead. Except for plain blunders
that may be lurking in the code, I w
done at some point?
If you don't have NRT, and you set your commit frequency to something
reasonably large, then I don't see the "cost" of SolrCloud, but I guess it
depends on the frequency of your updates.
On 30 July 2014 08:22, Harald Kirsch wrote:
Thanks Erick,
for the c
like.
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-rebuild-index-in-SolrCloud-td4054574.html
From time to time such recipes are mentioned in the list.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Harald Kirsch
wrote:
Hi all,
from the Solr documentation I find two options how replication
Hi all,
from the Solr documentation I find two options how replication of an
indexing is handled:
a) SolrCloud indexes on master and all slaves in parallel to support NRT
(near realtime search)
b) Legacy replication where only the master does the indexing and slave
receive index copies onc
Hi,
the stack trace points to tika, which is likely in the process of
extracting indexable plain text from some document.
Tika's job is one of the dirtiest you can think of in the whole indexing
business. We throw all kinds of more or less
documented/broken/misguided/ill-designed/cruft/trunc
org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:231)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1075)
How can i fix this?
Thanks,
Ameya
--
Harald Kirsch
Raytion GmbH
Kaiser-Friedrich-Ring 74
40547 Duesseldorf
Fon +49 211 53883-216
Fax
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-irregularly-having-QTime-5ms-stracing-solr-cures-the-problem-tp4146047p4147512.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Harald Kirsch
Raytion GmbH
Kaiser-Friedrich-Ring 74
40547 Duesseldo
This problem seems to completely disappear under load. I started making
load tests despite fearing them to be useless. It turns out that there
are no more 5 ms delays under load.
Harald.
On 09.07.2014 09:50, Harald Kirsch wrote:
Good point. I will see if I can get the necessary access
fl=id). That should
reduce the disk seeks due to assembling the docs.
But 4 qps for simple term queries seems very slow at first blush.
FWIW,
Erick
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Harald Kirsch
wrote:
Hi everyone,
currently I am taking some performance measurements on a Solr installation
and
Thanks IJ for the link. I am not sure this can solve my problem, because
I have only one machine in play anyway.
Harald.
On 12.07.2014 20:49, IJ wrote:
GUess - I had the same issues as you. Was resolved
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Slow-QTimes-5-seconds-for-Small-sized-Collections-td4143
Hi everyone,
currently I am taking some performance measurements on a Solr
installation and I am trying to figure out if what I see mostly fits
expectations:
The data is as follows:
- solr 4.8.1
- 8 millon documents
- mostly office documents with real text content, stored
- index size on dis
d way. Knowing exactly what's happening at
the transport level is worth a month of guessing and poking.
On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:53 AM, Harald Kirsch wrote:
Hi all,
This is what happens when I run a regular wget query to log the current number
of documents indexed:
2014-07-08:07:23:2
, "Harald Kirsch" wrote:
Hi all,
This is what happens when I run a regular wget query to log the current
number of documents indexed:
2014-07-08:07:23:28 QTime=20 numFound="5720168"
2014-07-08:07:24:28 QTime=12 numFound="5721126"
2014-07-08:07:25:28 QTime=19 numFo
Hi all,
This is what happens when I run a regular wget query to log the current
number of documents indexed:
2014-07-08:07:23:28 QTime=20 numFound="5720168"
2014-07-08:07:24:28 QTime=12 numFound="5721126"
2014-07-08:07:25:28 QTime=19 numFound="5721126"
2014-07-08:07:27:18 QTime=50071 numFound=
Hello Kalle,
we noticed the same problem some weeks ago:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Share-splitting-at-23-million-documents-gt-OOM-td4085064.html
Would be interesting to hear if there is more positive feedback this time.
We finally concluded that it may be worth to start with many shar
Regards,
Harald.
--
Harald Kirsch
Raytion GmbH
Kaiser-Friedrich-Ring 74
40547 Duesseldorf
Fon +49-211-550266-0
Fax +49-211-550266-19
http://www.raytion.com
17 matches
Mail list logo