dIgtTdaZYLG3jsYsLQqWtQBb9-cHsyG58r_mvTm-E&s=RgNvfB_bRwAfe9NpY1HedFlSHUNY0QbZ4VCXTzduTMo&e=
Regards,
Alex.
On 25 September 2018 at 16:50, John Blythe wrote:
> you can update your filter query to be a facet query, this will apply
> the query to the resulting facet set instead of the Communities field itself.
>
>
ect: [EXT] Re: Faceting with a multi valued field
you can update your filter query to be a facet query, this will apply the query
to the resulting facet set instead of the Communities field itself.
--
John Blythe
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:15 PM Hanjan, Harinder
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I
Hello!
I am doing faceting on a field which has multiple values and it's yielding
expected but undesireable results. I need different behaviour but not sure how
to formulate a query for it. Here is my current setup.
= Data Set =
{
"Communities":["BANFF TRAIL - BNF", "PARKDALE - PKD"],
HpoP0&e=)
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Hanjan, Harinder
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am doing wildcard queries to satisfy our search type ahead requirement for
> both single and mutli word (phrases) queries.
> I just noticed this error in the logs.
&g
Hello!
I am doing wildcard queries to satisfy our search type ahead requirement for
both single and mutli word (phrases) queries.
I just noticed this error in the logs.
2018-08-22 16:36:48.433 INFO (qtp1654589030-18) [ x:suggestions]
o.a.s.c.S.Request [suggestions] webapp=/solr path=/select
Keeping the field as string so that no analysis is done on it has yielded
promising results.
I will test more tomorrow and report back.
-Original Message-
From: Hanjan, Harinder [mailto:harinder.han...@calgary.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 5:01 PM
To: solr-user
Hello!
I can't get Solr to give the results I would expect, would appreciate if
someone could point me in the right direction here.
/select?q={!complexphrase}"gar*"
shows me the following terms
-garages
-garburator
-gardening
-gardens
-garage
-
.
Regards,
Alex
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018, 01:02 Hanjan, Harinder,
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am indexing web documents and have a need to extract their top-level
> URL to be stored in a different field. I have had some success with
> the PatternTokenizerFactory (relevant schema bits at
Hello!
I am indexing web documents and have a need to extract their top-level URL to
be stored in a different field. I have had some success with the
PatternTokenizerFactory (relevant schema bits at the bottom) but the behavior
appears to be inconsistent. Most of the times, the top level URL i
This seems promising
https://github.com/lucidworks/banana
-Original Message-
From: Ennio Bozzetti [mailto:ebozze...@thorlabs.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 1:39 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [EXT] Search Analytics Help
Hello,
I'm setting up SOLR on an internal websit
9LuidNkyKDuvdq3M&r=N30IrhmaeKKhVHu13d-HO9gO9CysWnvGGoKrSNEuM3U&m=RkNfel_ImtzaUi1-fKXjGS0tiL3Vg2u2A2HKc0iMBGM&s=VrGqjG23NC5KbsEV-SZuu6s-Njx_XZRPp4uHkrmM_KY&e=
written by a colleague of mine at Flax. Hope this is useful.
Cheers
Charlie
On 9 April 2018 at 19:26, Hanjan, Harinder
wrote:
> Thank
Solr, which will allow you to catch
this kind of problem and prevent it bringing down your Solr installation.
Cheers
Charlie
On 9 April 2018 at 16:59, Hanjan, Harinder
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Solr (i.e. Tika) throws a "zip bomb" exception with certain document
Hello!
Solr (i.e. Tika) throws a "zip bomb" exception with certain documents we have
in our Sharepoint system. I have used the tika-app.jar directly to extract the
document in question and it does _not_ throw an exception and extract the
contents just fine. So it would seem Solr is doing someth
Hello!
I'm sending a HTML document to Solr and Tika is throwing the "Zip bomb
detected!" exception back. Looks like Tika has an arbitrary limit of 100 level
of XML element nesting
(https://github.com/apache/tika/blob/9130bbc1fa6d69419b2ad294917260d6b1cced08/tika-core/src/main/java/org/apache/ti
14 matches
Mail list logo
