> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 14:55:21 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Re: Phrase Query Performance Question
> and score threshold> > On 11/5/07, Haishan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> >
> If I limit the docume
Hoss,
If I limit the documents returned based on a score threshold (filter by score)
will it be able to improve query performance? My intuition is it won't be able
to because you will still have to calculate the score and then compare to the
threshold.
I know it may not be meaningful to do s
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 12:31:29 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Re: Phrase Query Performance Question>
> > > : It still feels to me that you are trying doing something unique with
> your> : phrase queries. Unfortunately, you still haven't said what
ept stopwords) appear in 5% to
10% of an index should NOT be that frequent? I guess I get the idea.
> > On 11/2/07 1:51 AM, "Haishan Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > Thanks
> > for the advice. You certainly have a point. I believe you mean a query>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Phrase Query Performance Question>
> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 11:25:26 -0700> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> > On
> 31-Oct-07, at 11:54 PM, Haishan Chen wrote:> > >> >> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007
> 17:54:53 -070
ean if I use Apache Tomcat Native library the query performance will
be better. Anyone has experience on that?
Thanks a lot
-Haishan
> > On 10/31/07 3:25 PM, "Mike Klaas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > On
> > 31-Oct-07, at 2:40
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:19:07 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: Phrase Query Performance Question>
> > > : ("auto repair") 100384 hits 946 ms(auto repair) 100384 hits 31ms("car >
> : repair"~100) 112183 hits 766 ms(car repair) 112183 hits
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Phrase Query Performance Question>
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:25:42 -0700> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> > On
> 31-Oct-07, at 2:40 PM, Haishan Chen wrote:> > >> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/l
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Phrase Query Performance Question>
> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:22:17 -0700> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> > On
> 30-Oct-07, at 6:09 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:> > > On 10/30/07, Haishan Chen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED
t; Phrase queries need to read and consider
> position information that> term queries do not.> > -Yonik> > On 10/26/07,
> Haishan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > I am a new Solr user and wonder if
> anyone can help me these questions. I used Solr to index about two
Re: phrase query performanceYonik SeeleyFri, 26 Oct 2007 08:09:52 -0700
The differences lie in Lucene.Instead of thinking of phrase queries as slow,
think of term queries as fast :-)Phrase queries need to read and consider
position information thatterm queries do not.
-Yonik
On 10/26/0
I am a new Solr user and wonder if anyone can help me these questions. I used
Solr to index about two million documents and query on it using standard
request handler. I disabled all cache. I found phrase query was substantially
slower than the usual query. The statistic I collected is as follo
I am a new Solr user and wonder if anyone can help me these questions. I used
Solr to index about two million documents and query on it using standard
request handler. I disabled all cache. I found phrase query was substantially
slower than the usual query. The statistic I collected is as follo
Hi Hoss,
I am sorry about that. I know it was not very polite to do so. I was new to the
community and new to mailing list. I was experimenting how to start a
discussion.
I tried starting the discussion by sending a new email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] But it doesn't seem to
I am a new Solr user and wonder if anyone can help me these questions. I used
Solr to index about two million documents and query on it using standard
request handler. I disabled all cache. I found phrase query was substantially
slower than the usual query. The statistic I collected is as follo
15 matches
Mail list logo
