Any ideas on this?
> We're running Apache Solr v3.1 and SolrJ is our client.
>
> We're passing multiple Arbitrary Faceting Query (facet.query) to get the
> number of matching documents (the facet count) evaluated over the search
> results in a *single* Solr query. My use case demands the actual m
Hi,
We're running Apache Solr v3.1 and SolrJ is our client.
We're passing multiple Arbitrary Faceting Query (facet.query) to get the
number of matching documents (the facet count) evaluated over the search
results in a *single* Solr query. My use case demands the actual matching
facet results/do
>> My question is, is it possible to run
>> multiple combination of search queries to just get only result count "in
a
>> single trip" without using "facet.query"?
>>
>
> No. AFAIK.
Yes, you're true. I just tried googling on this and I'm finding that a
requirement similar to mine is being filed u
Hi Mikhail,
> have you considered to junk your subqueries into disjunction
> (BooleanQuery.Occurs.SHOULD) and request
>
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.query_:_Arbitrary_Qu
ery_Faceting?
Thanks for pointing/guiding me at the right time and/or direction about Solr
"Facet Que
> 1. If I understand correctly you just need to perform one query. Like so
> (translated to propper syntax of course):
>("SQL Server" OR SQL) OR ("Visual Basic" OR VB.NET) OR (Java AND
> JavaScript)
No, it's not just one single query, rather, as I've mentioned before, it's
combination of sea
Hi,
First off, we're a happy user of Apache Solr v3.1 Enterprise search server,
integrated and successfully running in our LIVE Production server.
Now, we're enhancing our existing search feature in our web application as
explained below, that truly helps application users in making informed
deci
> edismax supports full query format of lucene parser.But you can search
using
> filter queries eg.
> qf=textfield1, textfield2, textfield3&fq=&textfield1:solr AND
> struts&fq=textfield2:solr AND struts&fq=textfield3:solr AND struts
> &fq=companyid:100
Is it not possible to build query without fil
Hi,
How do I write/build a Solr query using dismax handler for my application
specific use case explained below:
Snippet of fields definition from schema.xml:
documentid
textfield1
Now, I want to search for documents containing "solr" and "struts" in all 3
text fields (textfield1, textfie
field in a
document?
ant luke?
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Gnanakumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Apache Solr v3.1.
>
> How do I list/get to see all the indexed terms of a particular field in a
> document (by passing Unique Key ID of the document)?
>
> For examp
Hi,
I'm using Apache Solr v3.1.
How do I list/get to see all the indexed terms of a particular field in a
document (by passing Unique Key ID of the document)?
For example, I've the following "field" definition in schema.xml:
In this case, I expect/want to list/see all the indexed terms of a
or fields to facet on).
>>
>> But you may want to use Text type with different analyzers selected.
>> You probably want Text type so the value is still split into different
>> tokens on word boundaries; you just don't want an analyzer set that
>> removes punct
Hi,
I'm using Apache Solr v3.1.
How do I configure/allow Solr to both index and query the term "c#" as a
whole word/term? From "Analysis" page, I could see that the term "c#" is
being reduced/converted into just "c" by solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory.
Regards,
Gnanam
Hi,
I'm new to Apache Solr and am currently exploring/trying to make use of
MoreLikeThis as a search component (instead of dedicated request handler).
I'm finding difficult to understand clearly on how this works internally to
get more-like-this results?
For example, I'm trying to search for the
Hi,
I'm new to Apache Solr and am currently exploring/trying to make use of
MoreLikeThis as a search component (instead of dedicated request handler).
I'm finding difficult to understand clearly on how this works internally to
get more-like-this results?
For example, I'm trying to search for the
14 matches
Mail list logo
