hello
I have a collection 0_2014_10_11 made of three shards
When I try a group.query, even specifying a single shard, i get this
error "shard
0 did not set sort field values (FieldDoc.fields is null); you must pass
fillFields=true to IndexSearcher.search on each shard"
This is the request, ask t
Sorry for the basic question
q=*:*&fq=-sku:2471834&fq=FiltroDispo:1&fq=has_image:1&rows=100&fl=descCat3,IDCat3,ranking2&group=true&group.field=IDCat3&group.sort=ranking2+desc&group.ngroups=true
returns some groups with no results. I'm using solr 4.8.0, the collection
has 3 shards
Am I missing so
st setup, is it worth the effort?
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Giovanni Bricconi
> wrote:
> > I have made some small patch to the application to make this problem less
> > visible, and I'm trying to perform the optimize once per hour,
e slightly different stats than replica 2, thus computing
> slightly different scores.
>
> Optimizing purges all data related to deleted documents, so it all
> regularizes itself on optimize.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Giovanni Bricconi
>
oblem related to indexing, only some malformed
query.
After doing an optimize the problem disappeared.
So, is the problem related to documents that where deleted from the index?
The optimization took 5 minutes to complete
2014-10-21 11:41 GMT+02:00 Giovanni Bricconi :
> Nice!
> I will monito
Nice!
I will monitor the index and try this if the problem comes back.
Actually the problem was due to small differences in score, so I think the
problem has the same origin
2014-10-21 8:10 GMT+02:00 lboutros :
> Hi Giovanni,
>
> we had this problem as well.
> The cause was that the different nod
Alex.
> Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
> Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart
> Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
>
>
> On 20 October 2014 04:49, Giovanni Bricconi
> wrote:
> > Hel
Hello
I have a procedure that sends small data changes during the day to a
solrcloud cluster, version 4.8
The cluster is made of three nodes, and three shards, each node contains
two shards
The procedure has been running for days; I don't know when but at some
point one of the cores has gone out
ers, whatever. They'll return the same _documents_,
> but....
>
> FWIW,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Giovanni Bricconi
> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I have one application that queries solr; when the index version changes
> > this appli
Hello
I have one application that queries solr; when the index version changes
this application has to redo some tasks.
Since I have more than one solr server, I would like to start these tasks
when all solr nodes are synchronized.
With master/slave configuration the application simply watched
h
enough time
> to test that out (and its not clear to me what form the value should take),
> at the time it was easier for me to brute force the files.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Giovanni Bricconi [mailto:giovanni.bricc...@banzai.it]
> Sent: Tuesday, M
Hello
I am migrating an application to solrcloud and I have to deal with a big
dictionary, about 10Mb
It seems that I can't upload it to zookeper, is there a way of specifying
an external file for the synonyms parameter?
can I compress the file or split it in many small files?
I have the same p
endent relevancy. This lets you create some test
> scenarios against a static data set. However, one downside is you can't
> recreate problems in production in your test setup exactly-- you have to
> find a similar issue that reflects what you're seeing.
>
> Cheers,
> -Do
http://rosenfeldmedia.com/books/search-analytics/
>
> http://www.sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
>
>
> Ahmet
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 12:17 PM, Giovanni Bricconi <
> giovanni.bricc...@banzai.it> wrote:
> It is about one year I'm working on
It is about one year I'm working on an e-commerce site, and unfortunately I
have no "information retrieval" background, so probably I am missing some
important practices about relevance tuning and search engines.
During this period I had to fix many "bugs" about bad search results, which
I have sol
hello
suppose I have this synonim
abxpower => abx power
and suppose you are indexing "abxpower pipp"
>From the analyzer I see that abxpower is splitted in two words, but the
second word "power" overlaps the next one
text raw_bytes keyword position start end type positionLength
abxpower [61 62 78
maybe
So you can keep the original id, maybe add also an originalTable field if
you don't like parsing the id colum to discover the table from which the
data was read.
2013/10/29 Stefan Matheis
> I'v
I have a small solr setup, not even on a physical machine but a vmware
virtual machine with a single cpu that reads data using DIH from a
database. The machine has no phisical disks attached but stores data on a
netapp nas.
Currently this machine indexes 320 documents/sec, not bad but we plan to
d
Maybe you can try with synonyms
add a
to the field type you are using for text and then place
habeas corpus => habeascorpusxx
int the special_words.txt file
then reindex some documents and try some queries with debugQuery=true.
remember to reload the core when changing configuration.
2013
I saw something similar when I placed some jar in tomcat/lib (data import
handler), the right place was instead WEB-INF/lib.
I would try placing al needed jars there.
2013/7/5 Michael Bakonyi
> Hm, can't anybody help me out? I still can't get my installation run
> correctly ...
>
> What I've fo
I have the same question. My purpose is to start the dih full process on
the leader and not on a replica.
I tried full import on a replica but watching logs it seemed to me that the
replica was loading data to send it to the leader which in turn has to
update all the replicas.
At least this is what
I have recently upgraded our application from solr 3.6 to solr 4.2.1, and I
have just started learning about soft commits and partial updates.
Currently I have one indexing node and 3 replicas of the same core, and
every modification goes through a dih delta index. This is usually ok but I
have so
I have a string field containing values such as "1khz" "1ghz" "1mhz" etc.
I use this field to show a facet, currently I'm showing results in
facet.sort=count order. Now I'm asked to reorder the facet according to the
unit of measure (khz/mhz/ghz).
I also have 3/4 other custom sorting to implement
Bella lì!
vedo che ci divertiamo
Il giorno 28/mar/2013 17:11, "Fabio Curti" ha
scritto:
> git clone https://github.com/kolstae/openpipe
> cd openpipe
> mvn install
>
> regards
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-and-OpenPipe-tp484777p4052079.html
This is really interesting!
Do you know if these added fields can be used in sorting or faceting?
Tanks
Il giorno 23/dic/2012 14:08, "Otis Gospodnetic"
ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Look into writing a custom SearchComponent.
>
> Otis
> Solr & ElasticSearch Support
> http://sematext.com/
> On Dec 23, 201
25 matches
Mail list logo
