RE: Solr 4.5.0 replication numDocs larger in slave

2014-03-04 Thread Geary, Frank
to false causes the IndexReaders to be reopened from the Directory which will never see those soft commits - only the hard commits. And of course on the slave side, after replication, the slave never sees any soft commits, only hard commits from the Directory. Frank -Original Message

RE: Solr 4.5.0 replication numDocs larger in slave

2014-03-03 Thread Geary, Frank
taking a snapshot of the master index and synching. > > bq: The slave has about 33 more documents and one fewer segements > (according to Overview in solr admin > > Sounds like the master is still indexing and you've deleted documents > on the master. > > Best, > Erick

RE: Solr 4.5.0 replication numDocs larger in slave

2014-03-03 Thread Geary, Frank
gements (according to Overview in solr admin Sounds like the master is still indexing and you've deleted documents on the master. Best, Erick On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Geary, Frank wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using Solr 4.5.0, I have a single master replicating to a single

Solr 4.5.0 replication numDocs larger in slave

2014-02-28 Thread Geary, Frank
Hi, I'm using Solr 4.5.0, I have a single master replicating to a single slave. Only the master is being indexed to - never the slave. The master is committed once each night. After the first commit and replication the numDoc counts are identical. After the next nightly commit and after the