wrote:
Günter Hipler wrote:
what about this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096
seems still unresolved issue?
Unfortunately Russell has de-shared the solrconfig.xml, but as far as I
remember it does not trigger faceting.
With our migration from version 4 to 7 last year we
Hi
what about this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096
seems still unresolved issue?
With our migration from version 4 to 7 last year we experienced similar
problems.
Günter
On 08.09.19 06:09, Russell Bahr wrote:
Hi David and Toke,
Thank you both for your input. I will be in DC
{
"appliedMethod": "UIF",
"elapse": 8310,
"field": "level",
"inputDocSetSize": 476,
"requestedMethod": "UIF"
}
]
}
Thanks
John
--
Günter Hipler
Universität Basel | Universitätsbibliothek | Projekt swissbib
Schönbeinstrasse 18-20 | 4056 Basel | Schweiz
Tel +41 61 207 31 12 | Fax +41 61 207 31 03
E-Mail guenter.hip...@unibas.ch | http://www.ub.unibas.ch |
https://www.swissbib.ch
.x)
I'm not sure if you would need to reindex without docValues on that
field to try it though.
Example: to enable on the "union" field, add f.union.facet.method=uif
Support for this was added in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8466
-Yonik
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:41 A
+publplace_txt_mv^25+publplace_dsv11_txt_mv^25+fulltext+callnumber^1000+ctrlnum^1000+publishDate+isbn+variant_isbn_isn_mv+issn+localcode+id&pf=title_short^1000&facet.mincount=1&hl.fl=fulltext&&wt=xml&facet.sort=count
Running the queries on smaller indices (8 million docs) the d
itle_additional_dsv11_txt_mv^100+series^200+topic^500+addfields_txt_mv^50+publplace_txt_mv^25+publplace_dsv11_txt_mv^25+fulltext+callnumber^1000+ctrlnum^1000+publishDate+isbn+variant_isbn_isn_mv+issn+localcode+id&pf=title_short^1000&facet.mincount=1&hl.fl=fulltext&facet=true&wt=xml&fa
Hi Erik,
thanks for your reply. I made some deeper investigations to tackle the
reason for the behavior but wasn't successful so far
Answer to your questions:
- yes I completely re-indexed the data
- yes I'm running a collection of around 5.000 queries coming from our
productive logs
Now my
.. 10 more
--
UNIVERSITÄT BASEL
Universitätsbibliothek
Günter Hipler
Projekt swissbib
Schönbeinstrasse 18-20
4056 Basel, Schweiz
Tel.: +41 61 267 31 12
Fax: +41 61 267 31 03
E-Mail guenter.hip...@unibas.ch
URL www.swissbib.org
rCore.(SolrCore.java:761)
... 10 more
--
UNIVERSITÄT BASEL
Universitätsbibliothek
Günter Hipler
Projekt swissbib
Schönbeinstrasse 18-20
4056 Basel, Schweiz
Tel.: +41 61 267 31 12
Fax: +41 61 267 31 03
E-Mail guenter.hip...@unibas.ch
URL www.swissbib.org
if someone of the SOLR core team could comment it.
Thanks a lot for support!
Günter Hipler
2012/8/31 Günter Hipler
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your responses!
>
> I made a more simple query with only one facet and without any boosting
> stuff so it should be easier to
once the whole index was newly created. After running
> : some updates I got these results.
> : The application reflecting this behaviour is available under:
> : http://sb-tp1.swissbib.unibas.ch
> :
> : We are using Lucene/SOLR since the end of last year and deployed
> regularly
> : the various nightly builds.
> : The last version this error(?) didn't appear is from March 2012. The
> : application using it is available under
> : http://baselbern.swissbib.ch
> : The target "books and more" is using the Lucene 4.0 march version. The
> : index is being updated several times a day and uses the same
> : filter queries as for Lucene/SOLR 4.0 beta and alpha.
> :
> : My question:
> : - has something changed in the last versions or is this a bug?
> :
> : Günter Hipler
> :
>
> -Hoss
he
application using it is available under
http://baselbern.swissbib.ch
The target "books and more" is using the Lucene 4.0 march version. The
index is being updated several times a day and uses the same
filter queries as for Lucene/SOLR 4.0 beta and alpha.
My question:
- has something changed in the last versions or is this a bug?
Günter Hipler
Hi Robert,
instead of my colleague, he is currently away. Subsequently you will see
the entire log. Oliver told me the problem and I had the impression that
something necessary for initialisation is missing. I "googled" a little bit
and found a patch you have done
https://issues.apache.org/jira/se
13 matches
Mail list logo