This question has come up several times over the past weeks.
The cause is probably all your fields being of type "string".
This is only good for exact matches like id's etc.
Try using "text" or another type that tokenizes.
-Original Message-
From: Hando420 [mailto:hando...@gmail.com]
Sen
Is there any reason why you have to limit each instance to only 1M
documents?
If you could put more documents in the same core I think it would
dramatically improve your response times.
-Original Message-
From: marship [mailto:mars...@126.com]
Sent: donderdag 15 juli 2010 6:23
To: solr-us
It will mostly likely be smaller but the new size is highly dependent on
the number of documents that you have deleted (because optimize actually
removes data instead of only flagging it).
-Original Message-
From: Karthik K [mailto:karthikkato...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 13 juli 2010 11:3
Is the Solr process still running?
Also what OS are you using?
-Original Message-
From: ZAROGKIKAS,GIORGOS [mailto:g.zarogki...@multirama.gr]
Sent: dinsdag 13 juli 2010 10:47
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Locked Index files
I found it but I can not delete
Any suggestion??
If you're only adding documents you can also have a go with
StreamingUpdateSolrServer instead of the CommonsHttpSolrServer.
Couple that with the suggestion of master/slave so the searches don't
interfere with the indexing and you should have a pretty responsive
system.
-Original Message-
F
Have you already looked at Hibernate Search?
It combines Hibernate ORM with indexing/searching functionality of
Lucene.
The latest version even comes with the Solr analyzers.
http://www.hibernate.org/subprojects/search.html
Regards,
Tom
-Original Message-
From: fachhoch [mailto:fachh...@
Hi Lukas,
Have you tried setting the debug mode (debugQuery=on)?
It provides very detailed info about the scoring, it might even be too
much for a regular user but for us it was very helpful at times.
Regards,
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Kahwe Smith [mailto:m...@pooteeweet.org]
S
Hello Hoss,
So far we have been using the default SearchHandler.
I also looked into a solution proposed on this mailing list by Geert-Jan
Brits using extra sort fields and functions to pick out the maximum.
This however proved rather cumbersome to integrate in our SolrJ client
and I also have som
I know it is not your standard question but would really appreciate
all
> feedback and suggestions on this because this is the issue that will
> make or break the acceptance of Solr for this client.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Fornoville, Tom
> S
dback and suggestions on this because this is the issue that will
make or break the acceptance of Solr for this client.
Thanks,
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Fornoville, Tom
Sent: woensdag 9 juni 2010 15:35
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: custom scorer in Solr
Hi all,
W
Hi all,
We are currently working on a proof-of-concept for a client using Solr
and have been able to configure all the features they want except the
scoring.
Problem is that they want scores that make results fall in buckets:
* Bucket 1: exact match on category (score = 4)
* Bu
Hello everyone,
I'm new to Solr but have been asked to do an evaluation as an
alternative for a commercial search engine.
I have some experience with Lucene and a java background so I'm not
afraid to dive into code :-)
The application now has a very particular way of sorting results using
Hi all,
I've had some mailserver problems and it seems this mail didn't reach
the mailing list.
If it did my apologies for the double post.
The last couple of days we are thinking of using Solr as our search
engine of choice. Most of the features we need are out of the box or can
be easily confi
13 matches
Mail list logo
