Frederik Kraus, il 28/09/2011 23:16, ha scritto:
Yep, I'm not getting more than 50-60% CPU during those load tests.
I would try reducing the number of shards. A part from the memory
discussion, this really seems to me a concurrency issue: too many
threads waiting for other threads to compl
Jaeger, Jay - DOT, il 28/09/2011 18:40, ha scritto:
That would still show up as the CPU being busy.
i don't know how the program (top, htop, whatever) displays the value
but when the cpu has a cache miss definitely that thread sits and waits
for a number of clock cycles
with 130GB of ram (
Frederik Kraus, il 28/09/2011 12:58, ha scritto:
Hi,
I am experiencing a strange issue doing some load tests. Our setup:
just because I've listened to JUG mates talking about that at the last
meeting, could it be that your CPUs are spending their time getting
things from RAM to CPU cache
Hi
Scott Smith, il 16/09/2011 02:30, ha scritto:
I've been using lucene for a number of years. We've now decided to move to
SOLR. I have a couple of questions.
1. I'm used to creating Boolean queries, filter queries, term queries,
etc. for lucene. Am I right in thinking that for SOL
a brief question: is using an IoC framework like spring an option for you?
if so, maybe this could help
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/dependency-injection-in-solr-td3292685.html#a3295939
samuele.mattiuzzo, il 31/08/2011 18:22, ha scritto:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error Instantiating
UpdateRequestProcessorFactory, ToTheGoCustom is not a
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessorFactory
btw you can't load classes in the default package from clas
Tomás Fernández Löbbe, il 29/08/2011 20:32, ha scritto:
You can use reflection to instantiate the correct object (specify the class
name on the parameter on the solrconfig and then invoke the constructor via
reflection). You'll have to manage the life-cycle of your object yourself.
If I understan
Satish Talim, il 30/08/2011 14:22, ha scritto:
But how to throw? As a stream of bits?
getBits() return a long[]
add a long[] part to your response
rb.rsp.add("long_array", obs.getBits())
federico
Satish Talim, il 30/08/2011 05:42, ha scritto:
[...]
Is there a work-around wherein I can send an OpenBitSet object?
JavaBinCodec (used by default by solr) supports writing arrays. you can
"getBits()" from openbitset and throw them into the binary response
federico
Satish Talim, il 30/08/2011 05:42, ha scritto:
[...]
Is there a work-around wherein I can send an OpenBitSet object?
JavaBinCodec (used by default by solr) supports writing arrays. you can
"getBits()" from openbitset and throw them into the binary response
federico
Tomás Fernández Löbbe, il 29/08/2011 17:58, ha scritto:
I think I get it. Many of the objects that depend on the configuration
are instantiated by using reflection, is that an option for you?
yes it is
what do you propose?
Tomás Fernández Löbbe, il 29/08/2011 17:58, ha scritto:
I think I get it. Many of the objects that depend on the configuration
are instantiated by using reflection, is that an option for you?
yes it is
what do you propose?
Tomás Fernández Löbbe, il 29/08/2011 16:39, ha scritto:
You can do a lot of dependency injection though solrconfig.xml and
schema.xml, Specify search components, update processors, filters,
similarity, etc. Solr doesn't use any DI framework, everything is built-in
in a pluggable manner. What kind
Hello everyone
I need to hack solr by adding a couple custom search components.
One small inconvenience is about configuring all the stuff. AFAIK
solrconfig.xml is not a place where to do dependency injection, not yet
at least.
Have you ever had the need to use DI on a solr configuration? How
14 matches
Mail list logo
