Found the reason for many evictions (bug in our code), please ignore the
specific question on filter cache.
All other questions (in bold) are still very relevant.
From: Esther Goldbraich/Haifa/IBM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: 27/08/2015 01:13 PM
Subject:Re: Solr 5.2.1
ts yet.
Appreciate your help,
Esther
From: Toke Eskildsen
To:
Date: 27/08/2015 12:27 PM
Subject:Re: Solr 5.2.1 versus Solr 4.7.0 performance
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 11:23 +0300, Esther Goldbraich wrote:
> We are using GC tuning options: Xgcpolicy:gencon , verbose:gc.
&
From: Shawn Heisey
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: 26/08/2015 06:25 PM
Subject:Re: Solr 5.2.1 versus Solr 4.7.0 performance
On 8/26/2015 1:11 AM, Esther Goldbraich wrote:
> We have benchmarked a set of queries on Solr 4.7.0 and 5.2.1 (with same
> data, same solrconf
Hello,
We have benchmarked a set of queries on Solr 4.7.0 and 5.2.1 (with same
data, same solrconfig.xml) and saw better query performance on Solr 4.7.0
(5-15% better than 5.2.1, with an exception of 100% improvement for one of
the queries ).
Using same JVM (IBM 1.7) and JVM params.
Index's size
; Caches disabled:
>
> q fq delta
> original query4113 4381 268
> w/o grouping 131 407276
> w/o sort on date 4217 4400 183
>
> Shai
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Esther Goldbraich
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you
ky
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks Shawn,
>> > >
>> > > What's Solr equivalence to ConstantScoreQuery? I.e., what if you
want to
>> > > run a query that does not score,
turned
off.
Also, when you try to use the "fq" version, what are you using for the
main query?
-Yonik
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Esther Goldbraich
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are comparing the performance of fq versus q for queries that are
> actually filters and should not
Some clarification:
I would like to understand how solr processes fq (without cache) versus q
when sort and group are required.
From:
Esther Goldbraich/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc:
Arnon Yogev/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, Shai Erera/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
Date:
24/06/2015 02:29 PM
Subject
}maildate:{DATE1
to DATE2}
sort=maildate_sort* desc
rows=50
start=0
group=true
group.query=some query (without dates)
group.query=*:*
group.sort=maildate_sort desc
additional fqs
Schema:
Thank you,
Esther
-
Esther Goldbraich
Social Technologies
