Can solr index replacement character

2020-11-30 Thread Eran Buchnick
Hi community, During integration tests with new data source I have noticed weird scenario where replacement character can't be searched, though, seems to be stored. I mean, honestly, I don't want that irrelevant data stored in my index but I wondered if solr can index replacement character (U+FFFD

Re: Required operator (+) is being ignored when using default conjunction operator AND

2020-04-11 Thread Eran Buchnick
Hoss, thanks a lot for the informative response. I understood my misunderstanding with infix and prefix operators. Need to rethink about the term occurrence support in my search service. Cheers! On Mon, Apr 6, 2020, 20:43 Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : I red your attached blog post (and more) but

Re: Required operator (+) is being ignored when using default conjunction operator AND

2020-04-05 Thread Eran Buchnick
Hoss, thanks a lot for the response. OK, so it seems like I got into to the "uncanny valley" of the search operators:/ I red your attached blog post (and more) but still the penny hasn't dropped yet about what causes the operator clash when the default operator is AND. I red that when q.op=AND, OR

Required operator (+) is being ignored when using default conjunction operator AND

2020-04-01 Thread Eran Buchnick
Using solr 8.3.0 it seems like required operator isn't functioning properly when default conjunction operator is AND. Steps to reproduce: 20 docs all have text field 17 have the value A 13 have the value B 10 have both A and B (the intersection) ===the data=== [ { "id": "0",