Hello,
We have migrated from Solr 5.4.1 to Solr 6.4.0 on Amazon EC2 and we have
a high CPU SYS usage and it drastically decreases the Solr performance.
The JVM version (java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.131-0.b11.el6_9.x86_64), the
Jetty version (9.3.14) and the OS version (CentOS 6.9) have not changed
w
t 12:35 PM, Elodie Sannier
wrote:
Hello,
We have found how to fix the problem.
When we update the original SolrQueryResponse object, we need to create
a new BasicResultContext object with the extra response.
Simplified code :
public class CustomSearchHandler extends SearchHandler {
p
Hello,
We have found how to fix the problem.
When we update the original SolrQueryResponse object, we need to create
a new BasicResultContext object with the extra response.
Simplified code :
public class CustomSearchHandler extends SearchHandler {
public void handleRequestBody(SolrQueryReques
y wrote:
On 3/14/2017 10:23 AM, Elodie Sannier wrote:
The request close() method decrements the reference count on the
searcher.
From what I could tell, that method decrements the reference counter,
but does not actually close the searcher object. I cannot tell you what
the correct procedure is
The request close() method decrements the reference count on the searcher.
public abstract class SolrQueryRequestBase implements SolrQueryRequest,
Closeable {
// The index searcher associated with this request
protected RefCounted searcherHolder;
public void close() {
if(this.searcher
manifest the problem but
other code wouldn't
is a mystery, just another sanity check.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Elodie Sannier wrote:
Hello,
We have migrated from Solr 5.4.1 to Solr 6.4.0 and the disk usage has
increased.
We found hundreds of references to deleted index
nywhere in this chain? If so, do you open
any searchers but
fail to close them? Although why 6.4 would manifest the problem but
other code wouldn't
is a mystery, just another sanity check.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Elodie Sannier wrote:
Hello,
We have migrated from Sol
Hello,
We have migrated from Solr 5.4.1 to Solr 6.4.0 and the disk usage has increased.
We found hundreds of references to deleted index files being held by solr.
Before the migration, we had 15-30% of disk space used, after the migration we
have 60-90% of disk space used.
We are using Solr Clo
use our implementation, we extend ExtendedSolrQueryParser
with a custom class and we override the methods newBooleanClause and
getBooleanQuery
How can we do this with solr 5.4.1 ?
Elodie Sannier
Kelkoo SAS
Société par Actions Simplifiée
Au capital de € 4.168.964,30
Siège social : 158 Ter Rue du
ExtendedSolrQueryParser
with a custom class and we override the method newPhraseQuery but with
solr 5 this method does not exist anymore
How can we do this with solr 5.4.1 ?
Elodie Sannier
Kelkoo SAS
Société par Actions Simplifiée
Siège social : 8, rue du Sentier 75002 Paris
425 093 069 RCS Paris
use our implementation, we extend ExtendedSolrQueryParser
with a custom class and we override the methods newBooleanClause and
getBooleanQuery
How can we do this with solr 5.4.1 ?
Elodie Sannier
Kelkoo SAS
Société par Actions Simplifiée
Au capital de € 4.168.964,30
Siège social : 8, rue du
, the response of the first
sub-query can be an instance of SolrDocumentList and the second
sub-query an instance of ResultContext ?
Elodie Sannier
Kelkoo SAS
Société par Actions Simplifiée
Au capital de € 4.168.964,30
Siège social : 8, rue du Sentier 75002 Paris
425 093 069 RCS Paris
Ce message et
I have this configuration for test servers (the order of the instance
start leads to this conf.) not for production.
Elodie
On 01/23/2014 04:35 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 12/11/2013 2:41 AM, Elodie Sannier wrote:
collection fr_blue:
- shard1 -> server-01 (replica1), server-01 (repli
commitWithin feature for distributed mode ?
This problem does not occur with the version 4.5.1.
Elodie Sannier
Kelkoo SAS
Société par Actions Simplifiée
Au capital de € 4.168.964,30
Siège social : 8, rue du Sentier 75002 Paris
425 093 069 RCS Paris
Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels
h a delay between them (about 15
seconds).
- or if I configure only one collection
- or if I have only one replica by shard
Elodie Sannier
--
Kelkoo
*Elodie Sannier *Software engineer
*E*elodie.sann...@kelkoo.fr <mailto:elodie.sann...@kelkoo.fr>
*Y!Messenger* kelkooelodies
*T* +33 (0)4 56 09 07 55 *M*
*A* 4/6 Rue des Méridiens 38130 Echirolles
By the way Yonik which version do you use (4.4.0 or nightly) ?
Elodie
On 09/10/2013 04:06 PM, Elodie Sannier wrote:
I didn't forget to commit my changes.
I used commands:
java -Durl=http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/update -jar post.jar
ipod_video.xml
curl 'http://localhost
http://lucidworks.com
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Elodie Sannier
wrote:
Hello,
I am using the solr version 4.4.0, when I'm using FunctionQuery with boolean
fields, it seems that the default field value is "true" for documents
without a value in the field.
The page http://w
true
10.0 = (MATCH) FunctionQuery(if(bool(inStock),const(10),const(0))), product of:
10.0 = if(bool(inStock)=true,const(10),const(0))
1.0 = boost
1.0 = queryNorm
Is that expected ?
Elodie Sannier
Kelkoo SAS
Société par Actions Simplifiée
Au capital de € 4.168.964,30
Siège social : 8, rue
Hello,
I'm using the 4.4.0 version but I still have the problem.
Should I create a JIRA issue for it ?
Elodie
On 06/21/2013 02:54 PM, Elodie Sannier wrote:
Hello,
I am using SolrCloud 4.2.1 with two shards, with the "debugQuery=true" parameter, when a
query does not return
I'm using java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.3-2.1.el6.1.x86_64 and
tomcat6-6.0.24-48.el6_3.noarch.
I tested with the 4.4 solr version but I still have the bug.
Elodie
Kelkoo SAS
Société par Actions Simplifiée
Au capital de € 4.168.964,30
Siège social : 8, rue du Sentier 75002 Paris
425 093 069 RCS Paris
here
https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-Artifacts-4.x/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/solr/package/
(the 18th of july).
Elodie Sannier
Kelkoo SAS
Société par Actions Simplifiée
Au capital de € 4.168.964,30
Siège social : 8, rue du Sentier 75002 Paris
425 093 069 RCS Paris
Ce message et les pièce
eate(CoreContainer.java:622)
... 10 more
The type is not found.
I include 'schema_integration.xml' like this in 'schema.xml' :
http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"/>
Is it a bug of the nightly version ?
Elodie Sannier
Kelkoo SAS
Société par Actions Simplifié
4.3.1 is available.
-Original Message-
From: Elodie Sannier [mailto:elodie.sann...@kelkoo.fr]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 8:54 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Subject: SolrCloud: no "timing" when no result in distributed mode
Hel
on't have the error.
Is it a bug of the distributed mode with the combination of debug and
group ?
Elodie Sannier
--
Kelkoo
*Elodie Sannier *Software engineer
*E*elodie.sann...@kelkoo.fr <mailto:elodie.sann...@kelkoo.fr>
*Y!Messenger* kelkooelodies
*T* +33 (0)4 56 09 07 55 *M*
*
'.*'
If i use the "distrib=false" parameter, the "timing" debug information is
returned:
curl -sS "http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=dummy&debugQuery=true&distrib=false"; | grep -o
'.*'
1.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.01.
.search.FieldCacheImpl$IntsFromArray#16648315\n\t'SegmentCoreReader(owner=_f(4.2.1):C9)'=>'popularity',int,null=>org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$IntsFromArray#16648315\n\t'SegmentCoreReader(owner=_f(4.2.1):C9)'=>'popularity',class
org.apache.lucene.index.SortedDoc
: How can I fix it ?
the impact is just that more ram is being used them is probably strictly
neccessary. unless there is something unusual in your fieldType
delcataion, i don't think there is an easy fix you can apply -- we need to
fix the underlying code.
-Hoss
--
Kelkoo
*Elodie
x27;t have the insane
instance but I'm not sure it is the good fix.
This insanity can have performance impact ?
How can I fix it ?
Elodie Sannier
Kelkoo SAS
Société par Actions Simplifiée
Au capital de € 4.168.964,30
Siège social : 8, rue du Sentier 75002 Paris
425 093 069 RCS Paris
Ce me
g the "int" type with
precisionStep="0", the distributed request works :
The precisionStep > 0 can be useful for range queries but is it normal
that it is not compatible with grouping queries, in distributed mode only ?
Elodie Sannier
Kelkoo SAS
Société par Actions Simpl
rver = new CloudSolrServer("localhost:2181");
solrServer.setDefaultCollection("aliasedCollection");
solrServer.connect();
solrServer.getZkStateReader().updateAliases();
Is there a better way to use collection aliases with solrj ?
Elodie Sannier
Kelkoo SAS
Société par Actions Simplifié
30 matches
Mail list logo
