If I understand it right, you want the json to only the new fields and not
the field that has already been indexed/stored.
Check out Solr Atomic updates. Below are some links which might help.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Atomic_Updates
http://yonik.com/solr/atomic-updates/
Remember, it requires t
to achieve is as follows.
> >
> > I query "Search for all the Laptops" and my tokenized key words are
> > "search laptop" (I apply stopword filter to filter out words like
> > for,all,the and i also user lowercase filter).
> > I want to display these toke
Can you please elaborate a more on what you are trying to achieve.
Tokenizers work on indexed field and doesn't effect how the values will be
displayed. The response value comes from stored field. If you want to see
how your query is being tokenized, you can do it using analysis interface
or enabl
You mean to say that the problem is with json which is being ingested.
What you are trying to achieve is that you want to split the values on the
basis of comma and index it as multiple value.
What problem you are facing in indexing json in format Solr expects. If you
don't have control over it,
you just need to make the field as multivalued.
type should be set based on your search requirements.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:27 PM, anurag.jain wrote:
> my json file look like
>
> [ { "last_name" : "jain", "training_skill":["c", "c++", "php,java,.net"] }]
>
> can u please suggest me how
As someone in the forum correctly said, if all Solr releases were
evolutionary Solr 4.0 is revolutionary. It has lots of improvement over the
previous releases like NoSql features, atomic updates, cloud features and
lot more.
Solr 4.0 would be the right migration I believe.
Can someone in the for
; Your second problem I'm not sure about. I remember some JIRAs about
> multivalued fields and atomic updates, you might get some info from the
> JIRAs here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR
>
> but updating multiValued fields _should_ work...
>
> Best
> Erick
&
Hi,
Does Solr 4.0 allows to update the values of multi-valued field? Say I have
list of values for skills field like java, j2ee and i want to change it
to solr, lucene.
I was trying to play with atomic updates and below is my observation:
I have following document in my index:
1
Dikchant
softwa
t/least prone to surprises.
> Especially since you could re-run the indexing as many times as necessary.
>
> The UniqueKey bits are only guaranteed to overwrite older docs when
> indexing, not merging.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Dikchant Sahi
ate
> records? Maybe the issue is there somewhere.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
> On 13 Dec 2012 15:17, "Dikchant Sahi" wrote:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > You got my point right. What I see is merge adds duplicate document. Is
> > there a way to overwrite
h
> - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
> once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Dikchant Sahi >wrote:
>
> > Hi Erick,
> >
> > Sorry for crea
wn at the time) and restart Solr.
>
> Why can't the boxes be connected? That's a much simpler way of going about
> it.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Dikchant Sahi >wrote:
>
> > Hi Walter,
> >
> > Thanks for t
> But is that the best approach? If you use personIds in your second index
> then you don't have to did that. Maybe you are after joins in Solr?
>
> Otis
> --
> SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
> On Dec 11, 2012 1:21 PM, "Dikchant Sahi" w
it when you are
> done with your updates and Solr will take care of it for you. The changes
> are not live until you commit.
>
> wunder
>
> On Dec 10, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Dikchant Sahi wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > How can we do delta update of offline indexes?
Multiple indexes can be setup using the multi core feature of Solr.
Below are the steps:
1. Add the core name and storage location of the core to
the $SOLR_HOME/solr.xml file.
**
**
2. Create the core-directories specified and following sub-directories in
it:
- conf: Contains th
Try debugging it using analysis page or running the query in debug mode
(&debugQuery=true).
In analysis page, add 'RCA-Jack/' to index and 'jacke' to query. This might
help you understanding the behavior.
If still unable to debug, some additional information would be required to
help.
On Tue, Se
DefaultSearchField is the field which is queried if you don't explicitly
specify the fields to query on.
Please refer to the below link:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Michael Della Bitta <
michael.della.bi...@appinions.com> wrote:
> Hello, Lakshmi,
>
> T
ck but
> anywhere.
> You are right I put the same NGramFilterFactory in both Query and Index
> however now it does not return any results not even the basic one.
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Dikchant Sahi [mailto:contacts...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2
You are creating grams only while indexing and not querying hence 'ludlwo'
would not match. Your analyzer will create the following grams while
indexing for 'ludlow': lu lud ludl ludlo ludlow and hence would not match
to 'ludlwo'.
Either you need to create gram while querying also or use Edit Dist
Hi Manish,
The attachment seems to be missing. Would you mind sharing the same.
Am a Search Engineer based in Bangalore. Would me interested in attending
the workshop.
Best Regards,
Dikchant Sahi
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Manish Bafna wrote:
> Dear Friend,
> We are organi
20 matches
Mail list logo
