We are harvesting and indexing bibliographic data, thus having many distinct
author names in our index. While testing Solr 4 I believe I had pushed a single
core to 100 million records (91GB of data) and everything was working fine and
fast. After adding a little more to the index, then followin
with release 1.4
> But, I suppose you already have a solr 3.x or more.
> So I'm afraid I can't help you more :o(
>
> Franck
>
>
> Le jeudi 29 mars 2012 à 15:41 +0200, Dennis Schafroth a écrit :
>> On Mar 29, 2012, at 14:49 , fbrisbart wrote:
>
ait before accepting queries.
>>
>> Example to load the FieldCache for 'your_facet_field' field :
>> ...
>>
>>
>>*:*true> name="facet.field">your_facet_field
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>> Franck
>>
>
load the FieldCache for 'your_facet_field' field :
> ...
>
>
>*:*true name="facet.field">your_facet_field
>
>
> ...
>
>
> Franck
>
> Le jeudi 29 mars 2012 à 13:30 +0200, Dennis Schafroth a écrit :
>> Hi
I ran out of memory on some big indexes when using solr 1.4. Found out that
increasing
termInfosIndexDivisor
in solrconfig.xml could help a lot.
It may slow down your searching your index.
cheers,
:-Dennis
On 02/06/2011, at 01.16, Alexey Serba wrote:
> Hey Denis,
>
> * How big is your in
of success
higher.
Any input will greatly appreciated.
cheers,
:-Dennis
On 17/05/2011, at 14.43, Dennis Schafroth wrote:
> Hi
>
> I can see others is having same issue but haven't seen any fixes or work
> around.
>
>
> I am adding and delete records mixed. I do
Hi
I can see others is having same issue but haven't seen any fixes or work
around.
I am adding and delete records mixed. I do bulks up till 1000 records. On the
commit I see the following in the client:
2011-05-17 13:42:41 ERROR - harvester
[main/com.indexdata.masterkey.localindices.harve
e stored, which can only be done by the
> indexer sending in multiple values, not through just tokenization.
>
> Erik
>
> On Jan 27, 2011, at 09:09 , Dennis Schafroth wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Pretty novice into SOLR coding, but looking for hints about how
Hi,
Pretty novice into SOLR coding, but looking for hints about how (if not already
done) to implement a PatternTokenizer, that would index this into multivalie
fields of solr.StrField for facetting. Ex.
Water -- Irrigation ; Water -- Sewage
should be tokenized into
Water
Irrigation
Sewage
Thanks, that did it.
On 09/09/2010, at 16.14, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> That's normal behavior if you haven't configured facet.mincount. Check the
> wiki.
>
> On Thursday 09 September 2010 16:05:01 Dennis Schafroth wrote:
>> I am definitely not excluding the idea tha
I haven't been able to reproduce it in a test index yet, but I do have two
different index that show similar problem (facets on zero hits).
cheers,
:-Dennis Schafroth
On 09/09/2010, at 15.10, Erick Erickson wrote:
> That looks...er...unfortunate. The very first thing I'd do is
quot;>0int> <int name=" ! ! R P R">0int> <int name=" !!rrqqyyhqhqwwllrqrqdd!!vvddvv">0int> <int name=" !""$%"( )*+,($"(">0int> <int name=" !()+, -./01 23456">0int> <int name=" !-decidable and decidable deductive procedures for a restricted FTL with Unless">0int> <int name=" !<f87.03...">0int> <int name=" ")338-8570">0int> <int name=" "-Optimization Schemes and L-Bit Precision: Alternative Perspectives in Combinatorial Optimization">0int> <int name=" "A picture is worth 1K words"">0int> lst> lst> <lst name="facet_dates"/> lst>response>
response_formated.xml
Description: XML document
I tried to look for a bug report, but haven't been able to find one that matches. I will try to setup a debug session to get closer, but would love to get feedback if this is a know issue.cheers, :-Dennis Schafroth
12 matches
Mail list logo
