Add fields to query when processing

How can I add a field name to query dynamicly? Examle: If user types "in stock" replace it with "quantity:[1 TO *]" -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Add-fields-to-query-when-processing-tf4610578.html#a1317 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Field name filter

When searching data, I need to process field name similar to processing terms. Lower-case of field name so field name is not case sensitive (all fileld names are lower case when indexed), have "synonyms" for field names, example-if user types article:abc or user types content:abc it both cases it

Re: Return only one result per results group

Thank you, I'll take a look. Pieter Berkel wrote: > > Debra, > > It sounds like what you are trying to do is implemented in a new feature > known as "Field collapsing" (see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 for more info). > Unfortunately

Return only one result per results group

Is there a way to receive only one result for each group of search results depending on a specified group field. Example: Searching a list of articles with author as the group field would return articles that match the query but will return only one article per author even if the author has mor

Re: Costume response writer

hossman_lucene wrote: > > > can you clarify: > > 1) which version of Solr you are using (the "Solr Implementation Version" > from /admin/registry.jsp gives the best answer) > > ... > > > -Hoss > > > Just downloaded the latest night build and viola it's back on track (with the other

Re: Costume response writer

SolrQueryRequest request, SolrQueryResponse response) throws IException { log.info("USING JDBC RESPONSE WRITER"); The line "USING JDBC RESPONSE WRITER" doesn't appear in the log. Thanks, Debra -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Costume-resp

Costume response writer

s not called (Even the first line of the write function in the costume writer,which is log.info("...") is not written out.). Any leads of what might be the cause? Thank you , Debra -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Costume-response-writer-tf3721357.html#a1041246

Reloading solr schema file

core =SolrCore.getSolrCore(); core=null; // first core.close(); ?? core =SolrCore.getSolrCore(); TIA Debra -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Reloading-solr-schema-file-tf3406562.html#a9489139 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Reload schema.xml

That was quick... I was editing my question while you sent the answer. I would appreciate if you can take a look at the edited question. Chris Hostetter wrote: > > > : Is there a way to reload schema.xml while solr is running? > > Afraid not ...there's a lot of interdependencies between the w

Reload schema.xml

Is there a way to reload schema.xml while solr is running? TIA Debra -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Reload-schema.xml-tf3404798.html#a9483346 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [2] SQL Update

I could create a list of field name + type, but doing so I might as well create it and add it to fields in schema.xml. Does solr reread the schema file when I post an add action or only on starup (or someother point)? In general, I wonder if adding the suffix for dynamic fields is not posing some

Re: [2] SQL Update

I wanted to add data from relational database tables. To avoid defining each and every table column name in the schema, I thought I'll append a suffix to the field name depending on it's type. Chris Hostetter wrote: > > > sorry, i'm really not following this talk of "stripping" the dynamic fi

Re: [2] Reindex only records that changed

ket when it changes and clear the bucket when you index > > > On 3/6/07, Debra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I would like to avoid such a field in case tables are updated in >> programs >> not under my control + any program that updates these table

Re: [2] Reindex only records that changed

I would like to avoid such a field in case tables are updated in programs not under my control + any program that updates these tables has to add logic for updating this field. Sergey Polzunov-2 wrote: > > additional field in your DB as flag? 1 - dirty, 0 - clean. > > Debra

Re: [2] Saving dynamic field name without dynamic extension

Thank you, your suggestion looks like the way to go... Mike Klaas wrote: > > On 3/6/07, Debra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I want to add a suffix to my fields names to use the dynamic fields >> feature. >> Is there a way to save the field name witho

Reindex only records that changed

Hi all, This is not a direct solr issue but I need it for indexing. Is there a way to check if a database record changed since the last index (with out using a specail flag field that has to be set any-where the record is updated). I would like to re-index only records that changed. TIA Debra

Re: [2] SQL Update

o get back the original field name. Does it make sense? Thank you, Debra ryan mckinley wrote: > > SOLR-103 is waiting for SOLR-139 to solidify before i post more updates... > > I have it running successfully, but it requires too many other patches > to suggest trying to get it ru

SQL Update

What is the status of the SQL update? Should all database fields used in sql updates be added to schema.xml before running the sql update? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SQL-Update-tf3358303.html#a9341018 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Saving dynamic field name without dynamic extension

I want to add a suffix to my fields names to use the dynamic fields feature. Is there a way to save the field name without the suffix so users can search by field with plain field name? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Saving-dynamic-field-name-without-dynamic-extension-t