I purchased Lucene In Action (really great book by the way, one of the best
technical books (if not the best) that I can ever read.
Its making me embarrassed about some of the questions I have already posted :)
That said, here is another one -- I found LuceneInAction.zip on
www.lucenebook.com
an get all references including pronouns?
Anybody see any holes in this? (sounds alarmingly easy so far)?
Dave
- Original Message ----
From: David Neubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 3:04:20 PM
Subject: Re: Associating pronouns ins
I'm approaching this from an in-the-guts-of-lucene perspective,
so
don't
even *think* of asking me how to really make this work in SOLR .
Best
Erick
On Nov 11, 2007 12:44 AM, David Neubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ryan (and others who need something to put them so
me to render I, he,
him, instead of the indexed acronym.
- Original Message
From: David Neubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 2:54:11 PM
Subject: Associating pronouns instances to proper nouns?
All,
I am working with very exact text
All,
I am working with very exact text and search over permament documents (books).
It would be great to associate pronouns like he, she, him, her, I, my, etc.
with the acutal author or person the pronoun refers to. I can see how I could
get pretty darn close with the synonym feature in Lucen
;
What Yonik is referring to is creating your own "case" field with the
per-book setting attached at index time.
Erik
On Nov 11, 2007, at 12:55 AM, David Neubert wrote:
> Yonik (or anyone else)
>
> Do you know where on-line documentation on the +case: syntax is
> located?
: Redundant indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case
sensitivity)
On Nov 10, 2007 4:24 PM, David Neubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So if I am hitting multiple fields (in the same search request) that
invoke different Analyzers -- am I at a dead end, and have to result to
c
read up on the payload discussion?
Dave
- Original Message
From: Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 5:00:43 PM
Subject: Re: Redundant indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case
sensitivity)
David Neube
Ryan,
Thanks for your response. I infer from your response that you can have a
different analyzer for each field -- I guess I should have figured that out
--but because I had not thought of that, I concluded that I needed multiple
indices (sorry , I am still very new to Solr/Lucene).
Does
Hi all,
Using SOLR, I believe I have to index the same content 4 times (not desirable)
into 2 indexes -- and I don't know how you can practically do multiple indexes
in SOLR (if indeed there is no better solution than 4 indexing runs into two
indexes?
My need is case-sensitive and case insensi
ld process termination (like power loss).
-Mike
> -Original Message-----
> From: David Neubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 10:56 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Delte all docs in a SOLR index?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
index?
A safer way is to stop Solr and remove the index directory. There is
less chance of corruption, and it will faster.
-Original Message-
From: David Neubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 10:56 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Delte all
Thanks!
- Original Message
From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2007 1:51:03 PM
Subject: Re: Delte all docs in a SOLR index?
: Sorry for another basic question -- but what is the best safe way to
: delete all docs in a SOL
Thanks!
- Original Message
From: Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2007 1:48:45 PM
Subject: Re: Delte all docs in a SOLR index?
> I tried
try:
*:*
ryan
__
Do You Yahoo!?
T
Sorry for another basic question -- but what is the best safe way to delete all
docs in a SOLR index.
I tried -- and that didn't work, plus wasn't sure if it
was safe -- when I put a real id in it works, but that is too tedious.
I am in my first few days using SOLR and Lucene, am iterating the
ne's new payloads to do this
kind of thing (at least, storing Xpath information is one of the
proposed uses: http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2007/03/18/payloads/ ),
as Erik Hatcher suggested in relation to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-380 .
Peter
-Original Message-
Fro
Is it possible to find boolean matches (foo AND bar) in a single unique
instance of a multi-value field. So if foo is found in one instance of
multi-value field, and is also found in another instance of the multi-value
field -- this WOULD NOT be a match, but only if both words are found in th
Chris
I'll try to track down your Jira issue.
(2) sounds very helpful -- I am only 2 days old in SOLR/Lucene experience, but
know what I need -- and basically its to search by the main granules in an xml
document, with usually turn out to be for books" book (rarley), chapter (more
often), para
Thanks -- C-Data might be useful -- and I was looking into dynamic fields as
solution as well -- I think a combination of the two might work.
- Original Message
From: "Hausherr, Jens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2007 4:03:02 AM
Subject:
ne (like
Lucene).
wunder
On 11/7/07 8:18 PM, "David Neubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sure this is 101 question, but I am bit confused about indexing
xml data
> using SOLR.
>
> I have rich xml content (books) that need to searched at granular
levels
> (
I am sure this is 101 question, but I am bit confused about indexing xml data
using SOLR.
I have rich xml content (books) that need to searched at granular levels
(specifically paragraph and sentence levels very accurately, no
approximations). My source text has exact and tags for this
purp
21 matches
Mail list logo
