Hello,
I have an application server that is running both the solr.war and a REST API
war within the same JVM. Is it possible to query the SOLR instance natively
(non-blocking) without connecting over HTTP? I could use EmbeddedSolrServer but
I cannot create a second instance of my core.
If I ca
Hi Dale,
I would think the coffee shop is better, I have in-laws visiting at home.
Thanks
Darin
> On Jul 24, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Aki Balogh wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm using TermVectorComponent and stemming (Porter) in order to get term
> frequencies with fuzzy matching. I'm stemming at index
approaches when I
tinker. This doesn’t mean I would take the unconventional approach to
production.
Thanks!
Darin
> On Jul 23, 2015, at 7:54 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
> On 7/23/2015 3:14 PM, Darin Amos wrote:
>> I have been trying to run the SOLR war with embedded Jetty and can’t
Hello,
I have been trying to run the SOLR war with embedded Jetty and can’t seem to
get the config quiet right. Is there any known documentation on this or is
someone else doing this? I seem to just be setting up a document server at my
solr.home directory. The code snippet below seems incomple
Hi All,
I sent an email out earlier but I didn’t get any responses so I thought I would
try to reframe the question.
I have a problem that I believe multivalued field grouping is the perfect
answer for, of course since SOLR doesn’t support multivalued field grouping, I
need to find an alterna
Hi All,
I have read over and over that SOLR still does not support grouping on
multivalued fields, however I have a requirement in which grouping on multi
valued fields is the perfect solve for.
Has anyone ever worked on a 3rd party library to do this, or is there any
alternative ways to do t
pond to my emails, the last few weeks
has been a good learning experience.
Darin Amos
Sent from my iPad
> On Dec 15, 2014, at 5:35 PM, Mikhail Khludnev
> wrote:
>
> Darin,
> I hardly follows your approach. I can propose you to check a few materials,
> just to sync termino
On Dec 15, 2014, at 3:45 PM, Mikhail Khludnev
> wrote:
>
> Hello Darin,
>
> Let me try to answer below,
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Darin Amos wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a simple question, is an instance of the QueryParser created
Hello,
I have a simple question, is an instance of the QueryParser created for every
single request and is that object thread safe?
I will try not to get into too much of the specifics but I have a custom
QueryParser and Search Component. Within my query parser when it is
instantiated, I execu
ess this would start to cause a lot of work.
Thanks
Darin
> On Dec 11, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Kydryavtsev Andrey wrote:
>
> How about something like
>
> ({!join from=parent to=id}color:red) AND ({!join from=parent
> to=id}color:blue) ?
>
> 11.12.2014, 19:48, "Darin Am
Hello,
I am trying to execute a join query that I am not 100% sure how to execute.
Lets say I have a bunch of parent and child documents and every one of my child
documents has a single value field “color”.
If I want to search all parents that have a “red” child, tis is very easy:
{!join from
Hello,
I posted this question within another thread and I think it got lost so I
wanted to start a new thread about it. I have built a small POC for a
customization I am hoping to get some validation on in case what I have built
is a really bad implementation. I have been doing a lot of digging
after noon). I have spent
countless hours over the weekend continuing to try and learn the internals of
SOLR and Lucene.
Thanks
Darin
> On Dec 8, 2014, at 4:57 AM, Mikhail Khludnev
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Darin Amos wrote:
>
>>
Hi All,
I have been working on a custom query and I am going off of samples in the
lucene join library (4.3.0) and I am a little unclear about a couple lines.
1) When getting a TermsEnum in
TermsIncludingScoreQuery.createWeight(…).scorer()… A previous TermsEnum is used
like the following:
seg
e
> passing (or maybe not...?)
> In my case, the relationships were across index segments, so I had to
> collect them first - but in some other situations, when you look only at
> the data inside one index segments, it _might_ be better to wait
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:
get
>>> out of sync with the index, if eg it was saved for later use and ran
>>> against newly opened searcher
>>>
>>> Roman
>>> On 4 Dec 2014 10:51, "Darin Amos" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello All,
>>>
segment keys, hence it exclude such leakage across different
> searchers.
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Roman Chyla wrote:
>
>> +1, additionally (as it follows from your observation) the query can get
>> out of sync with the index, if eg it was saved for later use and
Hello All,
I have been doing a lot of research in building some custom queries and I have
been looking at the Lucene Join library as a reference. I noticed something
that I believe could actually have a negative side effect.
Specifically I was looking at the JoinUtil.createJoinQuery(…) method a
wrote:
>
> Have you considered using grouping? If I understand your requirements, I
> think it does what you want.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Result+Grouping
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Result+Grouping>
>
> On 1
owse/SOLR-6234>
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Darin Amos <mailto:dari...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I had sent an email a few days ago talking about implementing a custom
>> rollup query component. I have changed directions a little b
Hello,
I had sent an email a few days ago talking about implementing a custom rollup
query component. I have changed directions a little bit because I have learned
about the JoinQuery.
I have an index that contains a combination of parent and child documents. The
parent child relationship is a
rk from _indexed_ terms, which are already in memory. Two
> different things.
>
> If I'm reading this right on a quick scan...
>
> Best
> Erick
> On Nov 28, 2014 10:21 AM, "Darin Amos" wrote:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> I am curious why this would
#x27;m all wet
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Darin Amos wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to implement a Rollup Search component on a version of SOLR that
>> exists previously to the parent/child additions, so I am trying
Hello,
I am trying to implement a Rollup Search component on a version of SOLR that
exists previously to the parent/child additions, so I am trying to implement my
own. The searches will be executed exclusively against the child documents, and
I want to “rollup” those child documents into the p
Hello All,
I am having a query issue I cannot seem to find the correct answer for. I am
searching against a list of items and returning facets for that list of items.
I would like to group the result set on a field such as a “parentItemId”.
parentItemId maps to other documents within the same c
rly difficult.
>
>
> : Subject: Roll up query with original facets
> : From: Darin Amos
> : In-Reply-To: <1398953952.39792.yahoomail...@web124702.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
> >
> : Message-Id: <5902ae5b-7545-45d4-8662-a9700e1ec...@gmail.com>
> : References: <
> d625
Hello All,
I am having a query issue I cannot seem to find the correct answer for. I am
searching against a list of items and returning facets for that list of items.
I would like to group the result set on a field such as a “parentItemId”.
parentItemId maps to other documents within the same c
27 matches
Mail list logo
