On 4/11/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Not really. The explain scores aren't normalized and I also couldn't
: find a way to get the explain data as anything other than a whitespace
: formatted text blob from Solr. Keep in mind that they need confidence
the defualt way Solr du
On 4/11/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A custom Similaity class with simplified tf, idf, and queryNorm functions
might also help you get scores from the Explain method that are more
easily manageable since you'll have predictible query structures hard
coded into your application
The example EmbeddedSolr class on the wiki makes use of getUpdateHandler
which was added after 1.1 (so it seems to be available only on trunk).
I'd really like to move to an embedded Solr sooner rather than later. My
questions are:
- Would it be easy/possible to work around the lack of
getUp
That is good to hear. I guess I was overly worried when I saw your
mention of having trouble getting the field values with the correct
types. I will be taking a look at this later this week.
Thank you very much for your prompt response.
On 4/10/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ther
I did a bit of research on the list for prior discussions of
normalized scores and such. Please forgive me if I overlooked
something relevant, but I didn't see anything exactly what I'm looking
for.
I am building a replacement for our current text matching engine that
takes a list of documents f
Ryan,
Do you have any of this code you could share? I am currently using
Solr to perform thousands of queries in a batch, and eliminating the
HTTP overhead is something I'd love to do if it isn't complicated. We
need several of the extra features Solr provides, which is why we are
trying to use
I'd like to be able to search for multi-word titles in a fuzzy manner
where small typos could be compensated for, but when you make a query
term like:
title:"The increadable machine"~
that will perform a word distance search instead of a fuzzy search.
Is it possible to do this without manually sp
parate instances of the multivalue field.
I hope this makes understanding my question better rather than worse. :)
Thanks,
Daniel
On 3/28/07, Daniel Einspanjer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
but I need to make sure that "Jane Doe" wouldn't
match a document with two directors, "Jane Smith" and "John Doe" at
all.
I'm rather new to Solr and somewhat rusty on what little I learned on
Lucene a few years back.
I've got some documents I want to index that have multiple name fields
such as directors or actors. I'm wanting to index them such that
querying for "Jane Doe" would have a higher score for "Jane M. Doe
