I solved it by changing the field names to camelcase and adding the facet limit
parameter to the query.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 31, 2017, at 4:19 AM, alessandro.benedetti
> wrote:
>
> What was the problem with the default in the end ?
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in cont
It would be nice if facets and all the parameters could be configured in a
config/xml file.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 31, 2017, at 4:19 AM, alessandro.benedetti
> wrote:
>
> What was the problem with the default in the end ?
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http
Only change was rename to remove periods from the fieldnames
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 27, 2017, at 11:53 AM, alessandro.benedetti
> wrote:
>
> Hi Khris,
> can you paste here the diff between the OK status and the KO status ?
> Has only the name of the destination field changed ? ( a replac
Why would this behavior changed from one day to the next? I ran crawl and index
several times with no issues, changed the schematic xml definition of a couple
of fields, ran crawl and index and produced the dataset with missing copyfields.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 27, 2017, at 4:07 AM, ales
Got it all. Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 22, 2016, at 3:36 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> Well, there are two options:
>
> 1> set up your autocommit interval in solrconfig.xml and wait for as
> long as you set it. Say 30 seconds for softcommit. Note, you must
> either use soft commit or
Afaik the only xml that nutch should be touching is its own config files. This
error shows up in solr admin
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 16, 2016, at 1:55 AM, Reth RM wrote:
>
> Are you indexing xml files through nutch? This exception purely looks like
> processing of in-correct format xml fil
Perfect. Just had to wrap the pho curl request URL with urlencode and it worked
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 17, 2016, at 5:56 PM, Kris Musshorn wrote:
>
> This q={!prefix f=metatag.date}2016-10 returns zero records
>
> -Original Message-
> From: KRIS MUSSHORN [mailto:mussho...@comcast
So what would be the right -?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 5, 2016, at 3:22 PM, Alan Woodward wrote:
>
> tr -d ā0-9ā is removing all numbers from the line, which Iām guessing is the
> opposite of what you want?
>
> Alan Woodward
> www.flax.co.uk
>
>
>> On 5 Oct 2016, at 20:17, KRIS MUSSHORN