(like Solr) and this information
would help show it is helping a large community.
Feel free to reply directly to me and I can add you.
Thanks.
--cw
Clay Webster
Associate VP, Platform Infrastructure
CNET, Inc. (Nasdaq:CNET)
'k. see SOLR-368.
--cw
On 9/28/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/28/07, Clay Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i'm late for dinner out, so i'm just attaching it here.
>
> Most attachments are stripped :-)
>
> -Yonik
>
i'm late for dinner out, so i'm just attaching it here. if someone wants to
throw it
in a jira or something, great. sadly, it's not a photoshop, it's paintshop
pro (.psp)
format. $79 was more in my budget.
have fun.
--cw
On 9/28/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> : I am tryi
___
> david whalen
> senior applications developer
> eNR Services, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 203-849-7240
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Clay Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 11:43 AM
> >
Condensing the loader into a single executable sounds right if
you have performance problems. ;-)
You could also try adding multiple s in a single post if you
notice your problems are with tcp setup time, though if you're
doing localhost connections that should be minimal.
If you're already local
Perhaps not the most elegant, but running each index on a
different container & port works pretty well. And we can tune
the jvm (and of course caches) differently.
--cw
Nice stuff. I like it. I could see that the crescent could be a bit bulky
in
some circumstances where you might want one with less vertical size.
I did the initial logo and +1 this one.
--cw
On 12/15/06, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/15/06, Fuad Efendi <[EMAIL PROTECT
How could faceted browsing be accomplished without [Chris's] metadata
documents?
--cw
On 3/29/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Solr has a lot of support to do faceted browsing, but one must
> currently write a custom query handler to implement the faceting
> logic.
>
> The support
Further, I'd discourage anyone from using NFS for their read/write index
location.
I don't know about Windows either, but I'd think there could be similar
non-atomic issues with windows fileshares. That's even in the case where
you have one RW and the others are reads.
--cw
On 3/24/06, Chris Hos
Jason,
I'm not following why you suggesting having multiple masters (and updating
multiple masters). I can see an advantage and lots of disadvantages. What
is the problem you're suggesting this could address?
--cw
On 3/24/06, Robert Haycock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it/will it be possible to cluster solr?
>
> We have a distributed system and it would be nice if we could replicate
> the index to improve performance.
>
>
Solr does not have replication. But it does have a very nice index
distribution s
11 matches
Mail list logo
