Thanks, Shawn.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/10/2014 2:50 PM, Chris W wrote:
>
>> Hi there
>>
>>I am using solrcloud (4.3). I am trying to get the status of a core
>> from
>> solr using (localhost:8000/solr/admin/cores?acti
Any help on this is much appreciated. I cannot find any documentation
around this and would be good to understand what this means
Thanks
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Chris W wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I am using solrcloud (4.3). I am trying to get the status of a core from
>
Hi there
I am using solrcloud (4.3). I am trying to get the status of a core from
solr using (localhost:8000/solr/admin/cores?action=STATUS&core=) and
i get the following output
100
102
2
20527
20
*false*
What does current mean? A few of the cores are optimized (with segment
count 1) and show
What is the role of an overseer in solrcloud? The documentation does not
offer full details about it. What if an overseer node goes down?
--
Best
--
C
AM, Fermin Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> that's what I'm trying. I'm however really cautious when it comes to a
> while (somethingIsTrue) { doSomething; sleep; }
>
> Is that safe? What if the slave hungs up, the network is slow/fails, etc?
>
> Thanks
>
>
&
Hi
You can use the "details" command to check the status of replication.
http://localhost:8983/solr/core_name/replication?command=details
The command returns an xml output and look out for the "isReplicating"
field in the output. Keep running the command in a loop until the flag
becomes false. T
(7)
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Chris W wrote:
> Sorry for the piecemeal approach but had another question. I have a 3 zk
> ensemble. Does making 2 zk as observer roles help speed up bootup of solr
> (due to decrease in time it takes to decide leaders for shards)?
>
>
&
Sorry for the piecemeal approach but had another question. I have a 3 zk
ensemble. Does making 2 zk as observer roles help speed up bootup of solr
(due to decrease in time it takes to decide leaders for shards)?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Chris W wrote:
> Thanks Tim. I would definit
Thanks Tim. I would definitely try that next time. I have seen a few
instances where the overseer_queue not getting processed but that looks
like an existing bug which got fixed in 4.6 (overseer doesnt process
requests when reload collection fails)
One question: Assuming our cluster can tolerate d
plicas? I'm not asking for a long list
> > here, just if you have a bazillion replicas in aggregate.
> >
> > Hours is surprising.
> >
> > Best,
> > Erick
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Chris W
> wrote:
> > > Thanks, Shalin
e available before leader
> election happens
>
> You can't do much about 1 right now I think. For #2, you can keep your
> transaction logs smaller by a hard commit before shutdown. For #3
> there is a leaderVoteWait settings but I'd rather not touch that
> unless it become
Hi there
Is there a limit on the # of collections solrcloud can support? Can
zk/solrcloud handle 1000s of collections?
Also i see that the bootup time of solrcloud increases with increase in #
of cores. I do not have any expensive warm up queries. How do i speedup
solr startup?
--
Best
--
C
its at all. I was mistaken.
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Chris W wrote:
> > Thanks, Shawn and Shalin
> >
> > How does the frequency of commit affect zookeeper?
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Shali
der election and during
> collection API commands. It doesn't correlate directly with indexing
> but is correlated with how frequently you call commit.
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> > On 3/18/2014 5:46 PM, Chris W wrote:
> >>
> >>
I am running a 3 node zookeeper 3.4.5 Quorum. I am running into issues
with Zookeeper transaction logs
[myid:2] - ERROR [main:QuorumPeer@453] - Unable to load database on disk
java.io.IOException: Unreasonable length = 1048587
at
org.apache.jute.BinaryInputArchive.readBuffer(BinaryInputArchive.j
Can you share a sample query ? Ensure you have filterquery, fl fields and
query result cache settings well tuned
To give you an example: A month ago I had an issue where a few of our
queries were taking 3+seconds with 5 shards and as I added more shards the
query was taking even longer. I figured
Any help on this is much appreciated. Is it better to use more cores for
zookeeper (as opposed to 1 core machine)?
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Chris W wrote:
> Hi Furkan
>
> Load on the network is very low when read workload is on the cluster.
> During indexing, a few of my &
t; about your infrastructure and Solr logs? (PS: 50 mb data *may *cause a
> problem for your architecture)
>
> Thanks;
> Furkan KAMACI
>
>
> 2014-03-13 0:57 GMT+02:00 Chris W :
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I have a 3 node zk ensemble . I see a very high latency for zk
&g
Hi
I have a 3 node zk ensemble . I see a very high latency for zk responses
and also a lot of outstanding requests (in the order of 30-40)
I also see that the requests are not going to all zookeeper nodes equally.
One node has more requests/connections than the others. I see that CPU/Mem
and di
We decided to go with the latest (it seems to have a lot more bug
/performance fixes). The issue i mentioned was a red herring. I was able to
successfully upgrade
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Chris W wrote:
> Moving 4 versions ahead may need much additional tests from my side to
>
and vetting requirements, but I thought I'd ask No use
> going through this twice if you can avoid it.
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Chris W wrote:
> > I am running solrcloud version 4.3.0 with a 10 m1.xlarge nodes and using
> > zk to manage the state/data for coll
I am running solrcloud version 4.3.0 with a 10 m1.xlarge nodes and using
zk to manage the state/data for collections and configs.I want to upgrade
to version 4.4.0.
When i deploy a 4.4 version of solrcloud in my test environment, none of
the collections/configs (created using the 4.3 version of
22 matches
Mail list logo
