I know I'm late to the party, but I recently learned that field compression was
removed as of Solr 1.4.1. I think a lot of sites were relying on that feature,
so I'm curious what people are doing now that it's gone. Specifically, what are
people doing to efficiently store *and highlight* large f
Have you already explored the idea of using a custom analyzer for your
field? Depending on your use case, that might work for you.
- Charlie
There seem to be a few parallel efforts at putting Solr in a cloud
configuration. See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/KattaIntegration, which
is based off of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395. Also
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud which is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1
I need to implement a search engine that will allow users to override
pieces of data and then search against or view that data. For example, a
doc that has the following values:
DocId FulltextMeta1 Meta2 Meta3
1 The quick brown fox foofoo foo
I'll take another look and see if it makes sense to have the index and
query time parameters the same or different.
As far as the initial issue, I think you're right Tom, it is hitting on
both. I think what threw me off was the highlighting -- in one of my
matching documents, the term "I-CAR" is h
I've got an odd scenario with a query a user's running. The user is
searching for the term "I-Car". It will hit if the document contains the
term "I-CAR" (all caps) but not if it's "I-Car". When I throw the terms
into the analysis page, the resulting tokens look identical, and my
"I-Car" tokens hi
I tried your suggestion, Hoss, but committing to the new coordinator
core doesn't change the indexVersion and therefore the ETag value isn't
changed.
I opened a new JIRA issue for this
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1765
Thanks,
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostett
Currently, I've got a Solr setup in which we're distributing searches
across two cores on a machine, say core1 and core2. I'm toying with the
notion of enabling Solr's HTTP caching on our system, but I noticed an
oddity when using it in combination with distributed searching. Say, for
example, I ha
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch
- Original Message ----
> From: Charlie Jackson
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, January 19, 2010 1:20:02 PM
> Subject: Rounding dates on sort and filter
>
> I've got a legacy date field that I'd
I've got a legacy date field that I'd like to round for sorting and
filtering. Right now, the index is large enough that sorting or
filtering on a date field takes 10-20 seconds (unless it's cached). I
know this is because the date field's precision is down to the
millisecond, and I don't really ne
as the min/max gram
size is met. In other words, for any queries two or more characters
long, this works for me. Less than two characters and it fails.
I don't know exactly why that is, but I'll take it anyway!
- Charlie
-Original Message-----
From: Charlie Jackson [mailto:ch
I have a requirement to be able to find hits within words in a free-form
id field. The field can have any type of alphanumeric data - it's as
likely it will be something like "123456" as it is to be "SUN-123-ABC".
I thought of using NGrams to accomplish the task, but I'm having a
problem. I set up
Oops, the missing trailing Z was probably just a cut and paste error.
It might be tough to come up with a case that can reproduce it -- it's a
sticky issue. I'll post it if I can, though.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: Tuesday, Septembe
I've run into a strange issue with my Solr installation. I'm running
queries that are sorting by a DateField field but from time to time, I'm
seeing individual records very much out of order. What's more, they
appear on multiple pages of my result set. Let me give an example.
Starting with a basic
The wiki page for merging solr cores
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MergingSolrIndexes) mentions that the cores
being merged cannot be indexed to during the merge. What about the core
being merged *to*? In terms of the example on the wiki page, I'm asking
if core0 can add docs while core1 and core2 a
concept, thanks for that info.
________
Charlie Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 11:17 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Entity extraction?
Th
e any experience with any of these?
Charlie Jackson
312-873-6537
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 10:23 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: E
simple demo: http://www.cortex-intelligence.com/tech/
>
> Rossini
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Charlie Jackson <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>
> > During a recent sales pitch to my company by FAST, they mentioned entity
> > extraction. I'd
During a recent sales pitch to my company by FAST, they mentioned entity
extraction. I'd never heard of it before, but they described it as
basically recognizing people/places/things in documents being indexed
and then being able to do faceting on this data at query time. Does
anything like this al
How do you handle commits to the index? By that, I mean that Solr
recreates its searcher when you issue a commit, but only for the system
that does the commit. Wouldn't you be left with searchers on the other
machines that are stale?
- Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Runo [mail
If you haven't explicity set the sort parameter, Solr will default to
ordering my score. Information about Lucene scoring can be found here
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/scoring.html
And, specifically, the score formula can be found here
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trun
I believe changing the "AND id: etc etc " part of the query to it's on
filter query will take care of your highlighting problem.
In other words, try a query like this:
q=(auto)&fq=id:(100 OR 1 OR 2 OR 3 OR 5 OR
6)&fl=score&hl.fl=content&hl=true&hl.fragsize=200&hl.snippets=2&hl.simpl
e.pre=%3Cb%3
ry 03, 2008 11:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Backup of a Solr index
Charlie Jackson wrote:
> Solr indexes are file-based, so there's no need to "dump" the index to a
> file.
>
But however one has first to shutdown the Solr server before copying the
i
Solr indexes are file-based, so there's no need to "dump" the index to a file.
In terms of how to create backups and move those backups to other servers,
check out this page http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CollectionDistribution.
Hope that helps.
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Kiegeland
Yeah I remember seeing that at one point when I was first looking at the
solrj client. I had plans to build on it but I got pulled away on
something else. Maybe it's time to take another look and see what I can
do with it. As Jonathan said, it's a good project to work on.
-Original Message--
ifference with that and Hibernate
Search<http://www.hibernate.org/410.html>
?
On Dec 20, 2007 2:09 PM, Charlie Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> > It uses an custom hibernate-SOLR
> bridge which allows transparent persistence of entities on differ
Congratulations!
> It uses an custom hibernate-SOLR
bridge which allows transparent persistence of entities on different
SOLR servers.
Any chance of this code making its way back to the SOLR community? Or,
if not, can you give me an idea how you did it? This seamless
integration of Hibernate an
$CALINA_HOME/conf/Catalina/localhost doesn't exist by default, but you can
create it and it will work exactly the same way it did in Tomcat 5. It's not
created by default because its not needed by the manager webapp anymore.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Runo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
bogus field in descending order before any other sorting criteria are
applied.
Either way, the document only appears when it matches the search
criteria, and it will always be on top.
kyle
On 10/24/07, Charlie Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, this will only work if the results a
all the results are returned based on
the query specified, but then resorted as specified. Boosting (which
modifies the document's score) should not change the order unless the
results are sorted by score.
Mark
On Oct 24, 2007, at 1:05 PM, Charlie Jackson wrote:
> Do you know which d
Do you know which document you want at the top? If so, I believe you
could just add an "OR" clause to your query to boost that document very
high, such as
?q=foo OR id:bar^1000
Tried this on my installation and it did, indeed push the document
specified to the top.
-Original Message-
The CommonsHttpSolrServer has a setConnectionTimeout method. For my
import, which was on a similar scale as yours, I had to set it up to
1000 (1 second). I think messing with this setting may take care of your
timeout problem.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Cool, thanks for the clarification, Ryan.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 5:28 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: quick allowDups questions
the default solrj implementation should do what you need.
>
> As
r the help!
-Original Message-
From: Mike Klaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 3:58 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: quick allowDups questions
On 10-Oct-07, at 1:11 PM, Charlie Jackson wrote:
> Anyway, I need to update some docs in my index
Normally this is the type of thing I'd just scour through the online
docs or the source code for, but I'm under the gun a bit.
Anyway, I need to update some docs in my index because my client program
wasn't accurately putting these docs in (values for one of the fields
was missing). I'm hoping
acceptable
beyond 8.8M records, or that you only had 8.8M records to index? If
the former, can you share the particular symptoms?
On 9/26/07, Charlie Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My experiences so far with this level of data have been good.
>
> Number of records: Maxed out at 8
My experiences so far with this level of data have been good.
Number of records: Maxed out at 8.8 million
Database size: friggin huge (100+ GB)
Index size: ~24 GB
1) It took me about a day to index 8 million docs using a non-optimized
program I wrote. It's non-optimized in the sense that it's not
You might want to check out this page
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat
Tomcat needs a small config change out of the box to properly support UTF-8.
Thanks,
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Mario Knezovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 12:58 PM
To: solr-
le to add facets; the example application implements one form of it.
The nice thing about the facet support is that it utilizes generics to
allow
you to have strongly typed name/value pairs for the fieldname/count
data.
Hope this helps.
-- jeff r.
On 8/10/07, Charlie Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Also, are there any examples out there of how to use Solrsharp's
faceting capabilities?
Charlie Jackson
312-873-6537
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 3:51
Trying to use Solrsharp (which is a great tool, BTW) to get some results
in a C# application. I see the HighlightFields method of the
QueryBuilder object and I've set it to my highlight field, but how do I
get at the results? I don't see anything in the SearchResults code that
does anything with th
What about issuing separate commits to the index on a regularly
scheduled basis? For example, you add documents to the index every 2
seconds, or however often, but these operations don't commit. Instead,
you have a cron'd script or something that just issues a commit every 5
or 10 minutes or whatev
I have a couple of questions regarding index corruptions.
1) Has anyone using Solr in a production environment ever experienced an
index corruption? If so, how frequently do they occur?
2) It seems like the CollectionDistribution setup would be a good way to
put in place a recovery plan fo
y.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message
From: Charlie Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2007 5:31:13 PM
Subject: RE: NullPointerException (not schema related)
I went with the first approach which got me up and running.
I went with the first approach which got me up and running. Your other
example config (using ./snapshooter) made me realize how foolish my
original problem was!
Anyway, I've got the whole thing up and running and it looks pretty
awesome!
One quick question, though. As stated in the wiki, one of
Nevermind this...looks like my problem was tagging the "args" as an
node instead of an node. Thanks anyway!
Charlie
-Original Message-----
From: Charlie Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 12:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: NullPointe
Hello,
I'm evaluating solr for potential use in an application I'm working on,
and it sounds like a really great fit. I'm having trouble getting the
Collection Distribution part set up, though. Initially, I had problems
setting up the postCommit listener. I first used this xml to configure
the
47 matches
Mail list logo
