having all the authors in your multivalued field)
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
Join the conversation: Like us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter!
-Original Message-
From: Anupam Bhattacharya [m
make sure you retrieve that field ONLY
when you really want it...
Now - if your XML files are relatively static (i.e. only change rarely, or only
have new ones) then it still might make sense to use a real DB to store those,
and just keep the primary key to the DB row in the Solr index.
Bob
Hi, Henri.
Make sure that the container in which you are running Solr is also set for
UTF-8.
For example, in Tomcat, in the server.xml file, your Connector definitions
should include:
URIEncoding="UTF-8"
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.
?", "\\:", ""};
/**
* Escapes all special characters from the Search Terms, so they don't get
confused with
* the Solr query language special characters.
* @param value - Search Term to escape
* @return - escaped Search value, suitable for
Solr /
Lucene is its configurability to achieve the results your business case calls
for. Part of the drawback of Solr / Lucene - especially for new folks - is its
configurability to achieve the results you business case calls for. :)
Anyone got anything else to suggest for Michael?
B
Um - looks like you specified your id value as "pdfy", which is reflected in
the results from the "*:*" query, but your id query is searching for "vpn",
hence no matches...
What does this query yield?
http://www/SearchApp/select/?q=id:pdfy
Bob Sandiford | Lead So
) of a matching mv
instance within your document? I.E. put the 'overhead' into the index step,
rather than trying to do it at search time?
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
> -Ori
Dumb question time - you are using a 64 bit Java, and not a 32 bit Java?
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernd Fehling [mailto:bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de]
'9' is the next page, why not just do another
query with id '9' to get the next record?
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonty Rhods [ma
Well, it sort of depends on what you mean by the 'previous' and the 'next'
record.
Do you have some type of sequencing built into your concept of your solr /
lucene indexes? Do you have sequential id's?
i.e. What's the use case, and what's the data availa
you do in fact get the most recent ones coming back first...)
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 11,
#x27;deleted' records still show up in query results...)
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark juszczec [mailto:mark.juszc...@gmail.com]
> Sent:
ave been
before the update. Otherwise, there's nothing for Solr to recognize as a
duplicate entry, and do a 'delete' and 'insert' instead of just an 'insert'.
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
w
...
(As others have said - this listserv is great!)
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
> -Original Message-
> From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
> Seeley
&g
lse to look at? Ringing any bells?
I can send more details if anyone wants specifics...
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com<http://www.sirsidynix.com/>
ther than me re-iterating that here.
[1] Caveats
1) We didn't do anything with the date type faceting, or with any ranges.
2) We didn't do anything with Facet prefix handling - it may or may not work if
you need prefixes.
3) Anything else that facets do that we didn't handle - or
facet values, and
then display the facet values with their counts, and when the users select one,
then we issue a new query to return all documents with that author facet value.
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsi
Oops - sorry - missed that...
Well, the multiValued setting is explicitly to allow multiple values.
So - what's your actual use case - i.e. why do you want multiple values in a
field, but not want it to be multiValued? What's the problem you're trying to
solve here?
Bob S
Omri - you need to indicate to Solr that your at_location field can accept
multiple values. Add this to the field declaration:
multiValued="true"
See this reference for more information / options:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml
Bob Sandiford | Lead Softwar
Unfortunately, wild card search terms don't get processed by the analyzers.
One suggestion that's fairly common is to make sure you lower case your wild
card search terms yourself before issuing the query.
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 |
ool I should be using to expand these?
I'm doing this in Windows XP.
Thanks!
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com<http://www.sirsidynix.com/>
Join the conversation - you may even get an iPad or Nook
text (i.e. with the highlight tags
still in place).
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
Join the conversation - you may even get an iPad or Nook out of it!
Like us on Facebook!
Follow us on Twitter!
>
What is your actual query? Did you look at the "hl.snippets" parameter?
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
Join the conversation - you may even get an iPad or Nook out of it!
Like us on Faceboo
>
> Please tick one of the options below with an [X]:
>
> [ ] I always use the JDK logging as bundled in solr.war, that's
> perfect
> [X] I sometimes use log4j or another framework and am happy with re-
> packaging solr.war
> [ ] Give me solr.war WITHOUT an slf4j logger binding, so I can choos
Don't you need to include your unique id field in your 'fl' parameter? It will
be needed anyways so you can match up the highlight fragments with the result
docs once highlighting is working...
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X69
now that I'm being ignored, vs unseen :)
Thanks!
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com<http://www.sirsidynix.com/>
Join the conversation - you may even get an iPad or Nook out of it!
ck"~100^100.0 OR
DOC_TEXT:"kljhklsdjahfkljsdhf book rck"~100^2 OR
PRIMARY_TITLE_boost:"kljhklsdjahfkljsdhf book rck"~100^1000.0 OR
AUTHOR_boost:"kljhklsdjahfkljsdhf book rck"~100^20.0 OR
textFuzzy:kljhklsdjahfkljsdhf~0.7 AND textFuzzy:book~0.7 AND
textFuzzy:rck~0.7
5
362
365
0
rock
24000
rick
6048
rack
84
reck
78
ruck
30
false
Thanks!
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com<http://www.sirsidynix.com/>
Oops. Sorry. I'm hijacking my own thread to put a real Subject in place...
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Sandiford
> Sent: Monday, April 25
che.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2061>
*
Thanks!
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com<http://www.sirsidynix.com/>
Have you looked at the 'qf' parameter?
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
_
http://www.cosugi.org/
> -Original Message-
> From: mrw [mailto:mikerobertsw...@gmail.com]
&
ards across multiple instances.
There are certainly implications here (like Relevance not being consistent
across cores / shards), but it works pretty well for us...
Thanks!
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.c
I don't suppose it's something silly like the fact that your indexing chain
includes 'words="stopwords.txt"', and your query chain does not?
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
Or - you could add a standard field to each shard, populate with a distinct
value for each shard, and facet on that field. Then look at the facet counts
of the value that corresponds to a shard, and, hey-presto, you're done...
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288
What if you put in a default value for the group_id field in the solr schema -
would that work for you? e.g. something like 'unknown' Then you'll get all
those with no original group_id value still grouped together, and you can
figure out at display time what you want to do
is - does this logical problem seem resolvable,
with an approach other than the brute force outlined above? I'm willing to
dive into the Solr / Lucene code if that's what it will take - I'd just like an
indication of what people think would be a good / possible approach before I
ield:@@EMPTY@@ instead of the negated form of the select... However, we
haven't considered things like what it does to index size. It's relatively
rare for us (that there not be a value), so our 'gut feel' is that it's not
impacting the indexes very much size-wise or pe
Shouldn't the second query have the clause:
&fq=themes_raw:Hotel en Restaurant
instead of:
&fq=themes:Hotel en Restaurant
Otherwise you're mixing apples (themes_raw) and oranges (themes).
(Notice how I cleverly extended the restaurant theme to be food related :))
Bo
the replication feature...
Thanks!
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010
e();
}
catch (IOException e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
And that's about it.
You could adjust the above so there's only one core per index that you want -
if you don't do complete reindexes, and don't need the index to always be
before the integer series
itself
So - for sorting - you would have:
string1 --> string11
string10 --> string210
string2 --> string12
which will then sort as string11, string12, string210, but use the original
strings as the displays you want.
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | S
40 matches
Mail list logo
