ate in the same format as you are using now,
> or in the Solr format of "-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ"?
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 00:32, Bill Tantzen wrote:
>
> > In a legacy application using Solr 4.1 and solrj, I have always been
> >
In a legacy application using Solr 4.1 and solrj, I have always been
able to add documents with TrieDateField types using java.util.Date
objects, for instance,
doc.addField ( "date", new java.util.Date() );
having recently upgraded to Solr 7.7, and updating my schema to
leverage DatePointField as
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bertrand Delacretaz
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 3:00 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: strange results from lucene
>
> On 4/17/07, Bill Tantzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > .
Hi all!
I have a simple java search client with which I am querying the index
created by solr. Most of the time, I am seeing consistent results - in
other words, when my query is 'title:dog' with my client, I get 46 matching
documents, and when I have a 'q=title:dog' in the solr url, I also get 4
I like A. It's a bit more serious/professional looking.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Yonik Seeley
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 12:52 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Solr logo poll
>
> Quick poll... Solr 2.1
Thank you - I don't know how I missed that!
Bill Tantzen
University of Minnesota Libraries
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-626-9949 (office) 612-325-1777 (cell)
I guess the man's a genius, but what
a dirty mind he has, hasn
>
> There's no way to do that directly at the moment, you'll need
> to convert them to the XML format that Solr expects.
>
Would someone be willing to point me to a resource that describes this
format?
Cheers!
Bill
Bill Tantzen
University of Minnesota Libraries
[EMAIL P
