= parameter b (norms omitted for field)
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Anupam Bhattacharya
wrote:
> For me the SOLR sort was working fine with boost increments of 1. But
> after some recent changes to do atomic updates to existing SOLR document
> now when I try to get ordered results I
3.6245 = score(doc=22,freq=1.0 =
termFreq=1.0\n), product of:\n 1001.0 = boost\n 5.458166 = idf,
computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5))
from:\n1.0 = docFreq\n351.0 = docCount\n 1.0 = tfNorm,
computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1) from:\n1.0 =
termFreq=1.0\n1.2 = parameter k1\n0.0 = parameter b (norms
omitted for field)\n",
"/news/event/2018/02/news_event_20180206_00":"\n2734.5413 = sum
of:\n 2734.5413 = weight(pageID:1aed96f2-0b44-11e8-94a2-067beceeb88f in
14) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:\n2734.5413 = score(doc=14,freq=1.0 =
termFreq=1.0\n), product of:\n 501.0 = boost\n 5.458166 = idf,
computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5))
from:\n1.0 = docFreq\n351.0 = docCount\n 1.0 = tfNorm,
computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1) from:\n1.0 =
termFreq=1.0\n1.2 = parameter k1\n0.0 = parameter b (norms
omitted for field)\n",
"/news/event/2018/01/news_event_20180130_08":"\n136.45415 = sum
of:\n 136.45415 = weight(pageID:9ed6136c-058c-11e8-8951-067beceeb88f in
13652) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:\n136.45415 =
score(doc=13652,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0\n), product of:\n 25.0 =
boost\n 5.458166 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5)
/ (docFreq + 0.5)) from:\n1.0 = docFreq\n351.0 =
docCount\n 1.0 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1)
from:\n1.0 = termFreq=1.0\n1.2 = parameter k1\n0.0
= parameter b (norms omitted for field)\n"},
"QParser":"LuceneQParser",
"timing":{
"time":19.0,
"prepare":{
"time":0.0,
"query":{
"time":0.0},
"facet":{
"time":0.0},
"facet_module":{
"time":0.0},
"mlt":{
"time":0.0},
"highlight":{
"time":0.0},
"stats":{
"time":0.0},
"expand":{
"time":0.0},
"terms":{
"time":0.0},
"debug":{
"time":0.0}},
"process":{
"time":19.0,
"query":{
"time":0.0},
"facet":{
"time":0.0},
"facet_module":{
"time":0.0},
"mlt":{
"time":0.0},
"highlight":{
"time":0.0},
"stats":{
"time":0.0},
"expand":{
"time":0.0},
"terms":{
"time":0.0},
"debug":{
"time":18.0}
--
Thanks & Regards
Anupam Bhattacharya
ch Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director
> Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
> --
> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
--
Thanks & Regards
Anupam Bhattacharya
cted.
Regards,
Anupam
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Anupam Bhattacharya
wrote:
> I have configured Solr Managed-schema as following
>
> Below configuration is for Full Text Search:
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>max
nary=title_txt_spellcheck_ja&spellcheck.collateExtendedResults=true&spellcheck.maxCollations=3
All the configurations were working fine till i changed
to
in text_general field type.
Any clues ?
Regards
Anupam Bhattacharya
How can I post the whole XML string to SOLR using its SOLRJ API ?
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Anupam Bhattacharya wrote:
> I am able to perform the xml atomic update properly using curl commands.
> However the moment I try to achieve the same using the solrj APIs I am
> facing
I am able to perform the xml atomic update properly using curl commands.
However the moment I try to achieve the same using the solrj APIs I am
facing problems.
What should be the equivalent SOLRJ api code to perform similar action
using the below CURL command ?
curl "http://search1.es.dupont.com
I am working on a offline tagging capability to tag records with a
thesaurus dictionary of key concepts. I am able to use the update="add"
option using xml and json update calls for a field to update specific
document field information. Although if I run the same atomic update query
twice then the
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On 26 December 2012 18:06, Anupam Bhattacharya
> wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > Is it possible to schedule full reindexing of all solr cores without
> going
> > to individually to the DIH screen o
s Ago (200)
Three Months Ago (300)
May (150)
April (100)
March (70)
Febraury (60)
Januaury (50)
Last Year (40)
Regards
Anupam Bhattacharya
les which sort the wrong way.
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Anupam Bhattacharya
> wrote:
> > The approach used to work perfectly.
> >
> > But recently i realized that it is not working for more than 30
> indexed
> > records.
> > I am using SOLR 3
The approach used to work perfectly.
But recently i realized that it is not working for more than 30 indexed
records.
I am using SOLR 3.5 version.
Is there another approach to SORT a title field in proper alphabetical
order irrespective of Lower case and Upper case.
Regards
Anupam
On Thu, M
e user is permitted to see.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Høydahl [mailto:j...@hoydahl.no]
> Sent: Fri 5/11/2012 9:45 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SOLR Security
>
> Hi,
>
> There is nothing stopping you from pointing Ajax-SOLR
k I
> would go through your application server, which would have access to all
> the users data and can forward that to the Solr server, thereby hiding it
> from the client.
>
> Mike
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Anupam Bhattacharya [mailto:anupam...@gmail.com]
&g
ossible?
> I just want to make sure these data is correctly indexed with correct value
> or for debugging purpose.
>
> --
> Chamnap
>
--
Thanks & Regards
Anupam Bhattacharya
rick
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Anupam Bhattacharya
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using ManifoldCF to Crawl data from Documentum repository. I am able
> > to successfully read the metadata/properties for the defined document
> types
> > in D
16 matches
Mail list logo
