= parameter b (norms omitted for field)
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Anupam Bhattacharya
wrote:
> For me the SOLR sort was working fine with boost increments of 1. But
> after some recent changes to do atomic updates to existing SOLR document
> now when I try to get ordered results I
3.6245 = score(doc=22,freq=1.0 =
termFreq=1.0\n), product of:\n 1001.0 = boost\n 5.458166 = idf,
computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5))
from:\n1.0 = docFreq\n351.0 = docCount\n 1.0 = tfNorm,
computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1) from:\n1.0 =
termFreq=1.0\n1.2 = parameter k1\n0.0 = parameter b (norms
omitted for field)\n",
"/news/event/2018/02/news_event_20180206_00":"\n2734.5413 = sum
of:\n 2734.5413 = weight(pageID:1aed96f2-0b44-11e8-94a2-067beceeb88f in
14) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:\n2734.5413 = score(doc=14,freq=1.0 =
termFreq=1.0\n), product of:\n 501.0 = boost\n 5.458166 = idf,
computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5))
from:\n1.0 = docFreq\n351.0 = docCount\n 1.0 = tfNorm,
computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1) from:\n1.0 =
termFreq=1.0\n1.2 = parameter k1\n0.0 = parameter b (norms
omitted for field)\n",
"/news/event/2018/01/news_event_20180130_08":"\n136.45415 = sum
of:\n 136.45415 = weight(pageID:9ed6136c-058c-11e8-8951-067beceeb88f in
13652) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:\n136.45415 =
score(doc=13652,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0\n), product of:\n 25.0 =
boost\n 5.458166 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5)
/ (docFreq + 0.5)) from:\n1.0 = docFreq\n351.0 =
docCount\n 1.0 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1)
from:\n1.0 = termFreq=1.0\n1.2 = parameter k1\n0.0
= parameter b (norms omitted for field)\n"},
"QParser":"LuceneQParser",
"timing":{
"time":19.0,
"prepare":{
"time":0.0,
"query":{
"time":0.0},
"facet":{
"time":0.0},
"facet_module":{
"time":0.0},
"mlt":{
"time":0.0},
"highlight":{
"time":0.0},
"stats":{
"time":0.0},
"expand":{
"time":0.0},
"terms":{
"time":0.0},
"debug":{
"time":0.0}},
"process":{
"time":19.0,
"query":{
"time":0.0},
"facet":{
"time":0.0},
"facet_module":{
"time":0.0},
"mlt":{
"time":0.0},
"highlight":{
"time":0.0},
"stats":{
"time":0.0},
"expand":{
"time":0.0},
"terms":{
"time":0.0},
"debug":{
"time":18.0}
--
Thanks & Regards
Anupam Bhattacharya
title_txt_spellcheck_en
true
true
./spellchecker_de
default
on
true
10
5
5
true
true
10
5
spellcheck
Regards,
Anupam
On Mon, Feb
cted.
Regards,
Anupam
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Anupam Bhattacharya
wrote:
> I have configured Solr Managed-schema as following
>
> Below configuration is for Full Text Search:
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>max
nary=title_txt_spellcheck_ja&spellcheck.collateExtendedResults=true&spellcheck.maxCollations=3
All the configurations were working fine till i changed
to
in text_general field type.
Any clues ?
Regards
Anupam Bhattacharya
How can I post the whole XML string to SOLR using its SOLRJ API ?
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Anupam Bhattacharya wrote:
> I am able to perform the xml atomic update properly using curl commands.
> However the moment I try to achieve the same using the solrj APIs I am
> facing
ation = new HashMap>();
List vals = new ArrayList();
vals.add(tag);
SolrInputDocument doc = new SolrInputDocument();
doc.addField("id", (String)qs2.getResults().get(j).get("id"));
operation.put("add",vals);
doc.addField("tags", operation);
Thanks in advance for any inputs.
Regards
Anupam
steel get added twice).
I looked at RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory but it helps to remove token
duplicate not multivalued field duplicates. Is there any updateProcessor to
stop the incoming duplicate value from indexing ?
Thanks in advance for any help.
Regards
Anupam
the previous indexing is over. Unfortunately to track the status of
indexing for a core one need to keeping pinging the server to check
completion status. Is there a way to get a response from SOLR once the
indexing is complete ?
How can i increase the connection pool size in SOLR ?
Regards
Anupam
s Ago (200)
Three Months Ago (300)
May (150)
April (100)
March (70)
Febraury (60)
Januaury (50)
Last Year (40)
Regards
Anupam Bhattacharya
les which sort the wrong way.
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Anupam Bhattacharya
> wrote:
> > The approach used to work perfectly.
> >
> > But recently i realized that it is not working for more than 30
> indexed
> > records.
> > I am using SOLR 3
The approach used to work perfectly.
But recently i realized that it is not working for more than 30 indexed
records.
I am using SOLR 3.5 version.
Is there another approach to SORT a title field in proper alphabetical
order irrespective of Lower case and Upper case.
Regards
Anupam
On Thu
son.nl":"map","facet.field":["title","abstract"],"wt":"json","rows":"0"}},"response":{"numFound":0,"start":0,"docs":[]},"facet_counts":{"facet_queries":{},"fa
Yes, I agree with you.
But Ajax-SOLR Framework doesn't fit in that manner. Any alternative
solution ?
Anupam
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Klostermeyer, Michael <
mklosterme...@riskexchange.com> wrote:
> Instead of hitting the Solr server directly from the client, I thin
You can use Luke to view Lucene Indexes.
Anupam
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Chamnap Chhorn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm doing data import using DIH in solr 3.5. I'm curious to know whether it
> is see the xml representation of indexed data from the browser. Is it
> p
rick
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Anupam Bhattacharya
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using ManifoldCF to Crawl data from Documentum repository. I am able
> > to successfully read the metadata/properties for the defined document
> types
> > in D
Please register me
17 matches
Mail list logo
