I wonder if you could increase the precision of your result set to reduce
its size? If you have 10M results for a query but only the first 10K
deserve to be represented by the faceting, what is it about those 10K that
makes them better than the other 9.99M? For example if some items are
boosted by
How about something like this?
{
"add-field-type": [
{
"name": "norepeat",
"class": "solr.TextField",
"analyzer": {
"tokenizer": {
"class": "solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"
},
"filter
I added the maxQueryLength option to DirectSolrSpellchecker in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14131 - that landed in 8.5.0 so
should be available to you.
Andy
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 23:53, gnandre wrote:
> Is there a way to truncate spellcheck.q param value from Solr side?
>
> On Wed
hi Jörn - something's decoding a UTF8 sequence using the legacy iso-8859-1
character set:
Jörn is J%C3%B6rn in UTF8
J%C3%B6rn misinterpreted as iso-8859-1 is Jörn
Jörn is J%C3%83%C2%B6rn in UTF8
I hope this helps track down the problem!
Andy
On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 12:08, Jörn Franke wrote:
>
