Erick, they are not going away after reload.
Emir, increased cpu and response time are on slaves. On all slaves. Here is
a thread dump
https://gist.github.com/andriiberezhynskyi/739d59cf78b043d653da (though not
sure that I did it right, I used jstack -F PID).
Thanks for your help!
Hi all!
We have master-slave configuration. Slaves are replicated on optimize.
Sometimes (not always) it happens that slave has two segments after
replication. I always thought that optimize is all about having only one
segment in your read replica. During this time when slave has two segments
we
Sure, Eric. Here it is
Attaching to process ID 9429, please wait...
Debugger attached successfully.
Server compiler detected.
JVM version is 25.51-b03
Deadlock Detection:
No deadlocks found.
Thread 9578: (state = BLOCKED)
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(boolean, long) @bci=0 (Compiled frame; informatio
Hi,
I have solr5.2.1 set up in master-slave configuration. Very often it
happens that solr slave starts replicating (I can see it in admin panel)
but it is getting stuck at 0% and never proceeds further. Usually restart
of slave helps.
Relevant logs from slave:
INFO - 2015-08-11 07:56:00.184; o
> -Yonik
>
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Andrii Berezhynskyi
> wrote:
> > I have a strange issue of facet buckets being empty for tint fields.
> > I have the following schema:
> >
> > > omitNorms="true"/>
> >
> &g
I have a strange issue of facet buckets being empty for tint fields.
I have the following schema:
...
Then I just import:
[{
"sku": "TEST_FACET",
"color": "yellow",
"width": 100.23,
"price": 1200
}]
when I do the following faceting request:
json.facet={
colors:{ter
ng to collapsing
query.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Andrii Berezhynskyi <
andrii.berezhyns...@home24.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When I use group.truncate and filtering I'm getting strange faceting
> results. If I use just grouping without filtering:
>
>
> group=true&
Forgot to mention that I'm using solr 5.0
Hi all,
When I use group.truncate and filtering I'm getting strange faceting
results. If I use just grouping without filtering:
group=true&group.field=parent_sku&group.ngroups=true&group.truncate=true&facet=true&facet.field=color,
then I get:
facet_fields": { "color": [ "white", 19742,
19742
