p; ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Jan 22, 2013 5:48 PM, "Anders Melchiorsen"
wrote:
Thanks, though I am still confused.
How about this one:
manu:apple => 1 hit
+name:video => 2 hits
manu:apple +name:video => 2 hits
Solr ignores the manu:apple part completely?
Chee
e queries are supported only at the top level, so the
"(-name:ipod)" matches nothing, so the query is equivalent to:
(name:ipod) => 3 hits
You can simply insert a "*:*" to assure that it is not a pure negative
query inside the parentheses:
(name:ipod) OR (*:* -name:ipod)
Hello!
With the example server of Solr 4.0.0 (with *.xml indexed), I get these
results:
*:* => 32 hits
name:ipod => 3 hits
-name:ipod => 29 hits
That is all fine, but for these next queries, I would expect to get 32
hits (i.e. everything), or at least the same number of hits for both
querie
Hi,
why do you need to change the lockType? Does a readonly instance need
locks at all?
thanks,
Anders.
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:00:54 +0200, Peter Karich wrote:
> Peter Sturge,
>
> this was a nice hint, thanks again! If you are here in Germany anytime I
> can invite you to a beer or an apfels
Hello.
I read the FAQ entry about rebuilding the index,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#How_can_I_rebuild_my_index_from_scratch_if_I_change_my_schema.3F
but it is not clear about the times when this is needed. So I wonder, do I
need to do it after adding a field, removing a field, changing fie
ies?
>
> Cheers
> Avlesh
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Anders Melchiorsen
> > wrote:
>
>> We are in a situation where we are trying to match up documents based
on
>> a
>> number of zipcodes.
>>
>> In our case, zipcodes are just integers, so that h
We are in a situation where we are trying to match up documents based on a
number of zipcodes.
In our case, zipcodes are just integers, so that hopefully simplifies
things.
So, we might have a document listing a number of zipcodes:
1200-1450,2000,5000-5999
and we want to do a search of "1100
t;
>
>
>
>
> where the contents of mapping.txt:
>
> "ü" => "ü"
> "ä" => "ä"
> "ï" => "ï"
> "ë" => "ë"
> "ö" => "ö"
> :
Hi.
When indexing the string "Günther" with
HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory (in analysis.jsp), I get two tokens,
"Gü" and "nther".
Is this a bug, or am I doing something wrong?
(Using a Solr nightly from 2009-05-29)
Anders.
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:25:52 +0200, Anders Melchiorsen wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:04:24 +0200, Anders Melchiorsen wrote:
>> However, in the normal highlighter, I am using usePhraseHighlighter and
>> highlightMultiTerm and it seems that there is no way to t
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:04:24 +0200, Anders Melchiorsen
wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:56:38 -0400, Erik Hatcher
> wrote:
>
>> One trick worth noting is the FieldAnalysisRequestHandler can provide
>> offsets from external text, which could be used for client-side
>
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:56:38 -0400, Erik Hatcher
wrote:
> One trick worth noting is the FieldAnalysisRequestHandler can provide
> offsets from external text, which could be used for client-side
> highlighting (see the showmatch parameter too).
Thanks. I tried doing this, and it almost works.
Ho
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:54:22 +0200, Anders Melchiorsen
wrote:
> Is it possible to have Solr highlight an arbitrary text that is posted at
> request time?
Hi again.
I wonder whether my question was too terse to be well understood.
What we want to do is to have an extra text highlighted
Is it possible to have Solr highlight an arbitrary text that is posted at
request time?
Currently, we are storing an unindexed HTML field in Solr, just to have it
highlighted. We would prefer to generate the HTML from the database at
presentation time, in order to keep the Solr index smaller and f
14 matches
Mail list logo