Hi,
You are right, it is a mistake in my phrase, for the tests with 4
shards/ 4 instances, the latency was worse (therefore *bigger*) than
for the tests with one shard.
In our case, the query rate is high.
Thanks,
Anca
On 10/30/2014 03:48 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 10/30/2014 4:32 AM, Anca
shards as long as the
underlying machine has the sufficient amount of parallelism.
Again, this advice is for a small number of shards, if you had a lot more
(hundreds) of shards and significant volume of requests, things start to
become a bit more fuzzy with other limits kicking in.
On 28 Oct 201
Hi,
We have a SolrCloud configuration of 10 servers, no sharding, 20
millions of documents, the index has 26 GB.
As the number of documents has increased recently, the performance of
the cluster decreased.
We thought of sharding the index, in order to measure the latency. What
is the best approa
Hi,
I tested the BoostQueryParser and it works on the simplified example.
But we need to keep the edismax Query parser, so I tried the following query
and it seems to work (I defined a local bf='' for qq).
&q=beautiful Christmas tree
&mm=2
&qf=title^12 description^2
&defType=edismax
&bf=map(que
iller wrote:
Sounds like you need to raise your ZooKeeper connection timeout.
Also, make sure you are using a concurrent garbage collector as a side note -
stop the world pauses should be avoided. Just good advice :)
- Mark
On Dec 18, 2013, at 5:48 AM, Anca Kopetz
<mailto:anca.kop...@kel
...
Is this a bug ?
Thank you,
Anca
On 12/30/2013 02:30 PM, Anca Kopetz wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your response.
When I try the URL you sent me, I get the following error message :
org.apache.solr.search.SyntaxError: Infinite Recursion detected parsing query
'beautiful Christmas tree'
his original post [1] to a similar discussion.
[1] http://search-lucene.com/m/nK6t9j1fuc2
On Monday, December 16, 2013 12:19 PM, Anca Kopetz
<mailto:anca.kop...@kelkoo.com> wrote:
Hi,
How to boost documents that contain all search terms in several of its fields ?
Below you cand fin
recovery, as I explained in the reply to
Mark's mail.
Best regards,
Anca Kopetz
On 12/19/2013 06:39 PM, Daniel Collins wrote:
Are you using a NRT solution, how often do you commit? We see similar
issues with PeerSync, but then we have a very active NRT system and we
soft-commit sub-secon
ection timeout.
Also, make sure you are using a concurrent garbage collector as a side note -
stop the world pauses should be avoided. Just good advice :)
- Mark
On Dec 18, 2013, at 5:48 AM, Anca Kopetz
<mailto:anca.kop...@kelkoo.com> wrote:
Hi,
In our SolrCloud cluster (2 shards, 8
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
18 Aralık 2013 Çarşamba tarihinde Anca Kopetz adlı
kullanıcı şöyle yazdı:
Hi,
In our SolrCloud cluster (2 shards, 8 replicas), the replicas go from
time to time into recovering state, and it takes more than 10 minutes to
finish to recover.
In logs, we see that
ache.solr.cloud.ZkController:publish:1021 - numShards not found on descriptor - reading it from system property
2013-12-05 14:01:22,860 [RecoveryThread] INFO org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryStrategy:doRecovery:495 - Finished recovery process. core=fr_green
Best regards,
Anca Kopetz
--
Anca Kopetz Software enginee
sts of
qf, but the results vary a lot.
Is there a way to add a boost on all search fields, the same way we do with pf on one field :
pf=title:2^3.0 ?
Thank you,
Anca
--
Anca Kopetz Software engineer
E anca.kop...@kelkoo.com Y!Messenger kelkooancak
T +33 (0)4 56 09 07 55
A 4/6 Rue
2&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13822482.
Any feedback is welcome.
Best regards,
Anca Kopetz
Kelkoo SAS
Société par Actions Simplifiée
Au capital de € 4.168.964,30
Siège social : 8, rue du Sentier 75002 Paris
425 093 069 RCS Paris
Ce message et les pièces jo
Hi Ken,
Have you managed to find out why these entries were stored into filterCache and
if they have an impact on the hit ratio ?
We noticed the same problem, there are entries of this type :
item_+(+(title:western^10.0 | ... in our filterCache.
Thanks,
Anca
On 07/02/2013 09:01 PM, Ken Krugle
will test them.
Best regards,
Anca
On 08/05/2013 10:42 AM, Anca Kopetz wrote:
Please read and follow this note about thread hijacking:
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack<http://people.apache.org/%7Ehossman/#threadhijack><http://people.apache.org/%7Ehossman/#threadhijac
Hi,
[I am sending again my message to the mailing list, as well as Shawn's reply.
Thanks Shawn for your explanations]
We are trying to improve the performance of our Solr Search application in
terms of QPS (queries per second).
We tuned SOLR settings (e.g. mergeFactor=3), launched several ben
nodes on 8 dedicated servers; 2 shards / 4 replicas
Hardware configuration: 2 Processors (16CPU cores) per server; 24GB of memory;
6GB allocated to JVM
Index: 13M documents, 15GB
Search algorithm : grouping, faceting, filter queries
Solr version 4.4
Best regards,
A
Hi,
We have a solr cloud cluster with 2 different collections, each
collection having many nodes. We try to get the status of each
collection using CoreAdminRequest.
The code gets all live nodes from the cluster and sends a request to
each node until it gets a valid response.
We would like to ha
18 matches
Mail list logo
