Hi Adam,
With FunctionQuery (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery) & DateMath (
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_5_1/solr-core/org/apache/solr/util/DateMathParser.html)
- round to the day level, subtract & divide by milliseconds_in_a_day
(86400K).
?q=*floor*(*div*(*sub*(*ms*(NOW/DAY),*ms*(NOW
Hi Susheel,
You might be able to pull something off using facet.prefix:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.prefix.
Will work when the prefix is exact and doesn't require any analysis,
something along these lines:
http://solr.pl/en/2013/03/25/autocomplete-on-multivalued-fields-
Hi Sandeep,
You are quite likely below capacity with this current set-up:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceProblems#OS_Disk_Cache
Few things for you to confirm:
1. Which version of Solr are you using?
2. The size of your index.
- Are fields stored? How much are these stored fields contr
Upayavira - Nice idea pushing in a nominal update when all fields are
stored, and it does work. The nominal update could be sent to a boolean
type dynamic field, that's not to be used for anything other than maybe
identifying documents that are done re-indexing.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:47 PM,
ions (omitNorms
option)
For a field with default boost (= 1), norm = lengthNorm (approximately
1/sqrrt(numTerms)). Norm's been multiplied twice in the query to divide the
score (approx.) by numTerms.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Aloke
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:36 PM, shahzad73 wrote:
> Aloke
Something you could do via function queries. Performance (for 500+ words)
is a doubtful.
1) With a separate float field (myfieldwordcount) that holds the count of
words from your query field (myfield):
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?wt=xml&indent=true&defType=func
&fl=id,myfield
&q
Hi Shahzad,
Have you tried with the Minimum Should Match feature:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax#mm_.28Minimum_.27Should.27_Match.29
Regards,
Aloke
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You can take your words, combine some % of them with AND. Then take
Hi David,
A separate Solr document for each section is a good option if you also need
to handle phrases, case, special characters, etc. within the title field.
How do you map them to dynamic fields?
E.g.: "Appendix for cities", "APPENDIX 1: Cities"
Regards,
Aloke
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:45 AM
Hi,
Try the UNC path instead: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Windows#Q6
Regards,
Aloke
On 9/20/13, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm having this same problem as described here:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17708163/absolute-paths-in-solr-xml-configuration-using-tomcat6-on-wind
Hi Aditya,
You need to start another 6 instances (9 instances in total) to
achieve this. The first 3 instances, as you mention, are already
assigned to the 3 shards. The next 3 will be become their replicas,
followed by the next 3 as the next replicas.
You could create two copies each of the exam
Hi Eric,
As Bryan suggests, you should look at appropriately setting up the
fragSize & maxAnalyzedChars for long documents.
One issue I find with your search request is that in trying to
highlight across three separate fields, you have added each of them as
a separate request param:
hl.fl=content
Hi Deepak,
As Hoss explains it, there wouldn't be any effect of changing the order of
individual search terms.
In addition, you could look at the Scoring algo:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/2_9_4/scoring.html#Algorithm,
http://lucene.apache.org/core/2_9_4/api/core/org/apache/lucene/search/package
Hi,
Please refer to my response from a few months back:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201303.mbox/%3ccaht6s2az_w2av04rdmoeeck5e9o0k4ytktf0pjsecsh-lls...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Our modelling is to index N (individual pages) + 1 (original document) in
Solr. Once a document ha
Hi Rob,
I think the wrong Content-type header is getting passed. Try one of these
instead:
curl '
http://localhost:8983/solr/update/csv?commit=true&separator=%09&stream.file=/tmp/sample.tmp
'
OR
curl 'http://localhost:8983/solr/update/csv?commit=true&separator=%09' -H
'Content-type:application/
tp://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#A.22delete.22_documents_by_ID_and_by_Query
).
Regards,
Aloke
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Ali, Saqib wrote:
> Thanks Aloke and Robert. Can you please give me code/query snippets?
> (newbie here)
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:31 P
Hi,
Facet by one of the duplicate fields (probably by the numeric field that
you mentioned) and set facet.mincount=2.
Regards,
Aloke
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Ali, Saqib wrote:
> hello,
>
> We have documents that are duplicates i.e. the ID is different, but rest of
> the fields are sam
Hi,
Since your data is well delimited, I'd suggest using CSV Updater, with the
delimiter/ separator set to: *'~*'
See: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV#separator
Looks like you might also have to additionally split based on your second
delimiter: *';'*
See: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Update
Location of the schema.xml:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_4_2_1/solr/example/solr/collection1/conf/schema.xml
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Aloke Ghoshal wrote:
> Here you go, it is the default 4.2.1 schema.xml (
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/luce
Here you go, it is the default 4.2.1 schema.xml (
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_4_2_1/solr/example/solr/solr.xml),
with the following additions:
Test with the field *ContTest*.
Regards,
Aloke
On Mon,
Hi Vicky,
Please check you if you have a second "multiValued" field by the name
"content" defined in your schema.xml. It is typically part of the default
schema definition & is different from the one you had initially posted had
"Content" with a capital C.
Here's the debugQuery on my system (wit
Hi,
That's correct the Analyzers will get applied to both Index & Query time.
In fact I do get results back for speedPost with this field definition.
Regards,
Aloke
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:21 PM, vicky desai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another Example I found is q=Content:wi-fi doesn't match for docume
Hi,
Based on your WhitespaceTokenizerFactory & due to the
LowerCaseFilterFactory the words actually indexed are:
speed, post, speedpost
You should get results for: q:Content:speedpost
So either remove the LowerCaseFilterFactory or add the
LowerCaseFilterFactory to as a query time Analyzer as wel
Should work once you set up both fields as multiValued (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Common_field_options).
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Utkarsh Sengar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to load a list in a solr filed and query for items in that
> list?
>
> example_core1:
>
> docu
Hi,
I would suggest boosting over sorting. Something along:
radius:[0 TO 10]^100 OR radius:[10 TO *]
Regards,
Aloke
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Raymond Wiker wrote:
> It will probably have better performance than having a "plan b" query that
> executes if the first query fails...
>
>
>
Compare timings in the following cases:
- Without the wildcard
- With suffix wild card only - test*
- With reverse wild card filter factory and two separate terms - *test OR
test*
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:15 PM, meena.sri...@mathworks.com <
meena.sri...@mathworks.com> wrote:
> Index size is arou
Does adding facet.mincount=2 help?
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> To search for duplicate IDs, I am running the following query:
> select?q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=id&rows=0
>
> However, since upgrading from Solr 4.1 to Solr 4.3 I am receiving
> OutOfMemoryError error
Hi Floyd,
We use SolrNet to connect to Solr from a C# application. Since SolrNet is
not aware about SolrCloud or ZK, we use a Http load balancer in front of
the Solr nodes & query via the load balancer url. You could use something
like HAProxy or Apache reverse proxy for load balancing.
On the ot
One option could be to get the clusterstate.json via the following Solr url
& figure out the leader from the response json:
*
http://server:port/solr/zookeeper?detail=true&path=%2Fclusterstate.json*
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:57 PM, vicky desai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a requirement where in I want
Hi Simon,
Good that it works.
The reason as far as I could make out is that by itself/ standalone the
SpellCheckComponent (used by the suggester) is not distributed. One way to
explicitly distribute the search is to provide the shards:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#Distributed_S
Hi,
Check the obvious first, that you have rebuilt & reloaded the suggest
dictionary individually on all nodes. Also the other checks here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6653186/solr-suggester-not-returning-any-results
Then, try with one of query component OR distrib=false setting:
http://l
Thanks Barani. Could also work out this way provided we start with a large
set of suggestions initially to increase the likelihood of getting some
matches when filtering down with the second query.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:51 PM, bbarani wrote:
> I would suggest you to take the suggested stri
h wildcard searches, or better yet NGram
> (EdgeNGram) behavior to get the right suggestion data back.
>
> I would suggest an additional core to accomplish this (fed via
> replication) to avoid cache entry collision with your normal queries.
>
> Hope that's useful to you.
>
&
wildcard patterns) and then send the suggestion query
> to the right field.
>
> Obviously this will get out of hand if you have too many of these...so
> this has limits.
>
> Jason
>
> On Jun 11, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Aloke Ghoshal wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Trying t
Hi,
Trying to find a way to filter down the suggested terms set based on the
term value of another indexed field?
Let's say we have the following documents indexed in Solr:
userid:1, groupid:1, content:"alpha beta gamma"
userid:2, groupid:1, content:"alternate better garden"
userid:3, groupid:2,
True, the container's request header size limit must be the reason then.
Try:
http://serverfault.com/questions/136249/how-do-we-increase-the-maximum-allowed-http-get-query-length-in-jetty
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Maybe it is hitting some kind of container limit o
Hi Kamal,
You might have to increase the value of maxBooleanClauses in solrconfig.xml
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml). The default value 1024 should
have been fine for 280 search terms.
Though not relevant to your query (OR query) take a look at for an
explanation:
http://solr.pl/en/2
Hi,
A work around could be to add columns from the second table as fields to
the Solr document from the first table. E.g. For DB query:
SELECT project_id
FROM projects
MINUS
SELECT project_id
FROM archived_project;
Add archived_projects as a boolean field to Projects in Solr & then query
as:
q=(
Hi,
We are going about solving this problem by splitting a N-page document in
to N separate documents (one per page, type=Page) + 1 additional combined
document (that has all the pages, type=Combined). All the N+1 documents
have the same doc_id.
The search is initially performed against the combi
Hi,
If you haven't already, please refer to:
http://www.ngdata.com/site/blog/57-ng.html
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-cloud-concepts-td3726292.html
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud#FAQ
Regards,
Aloke
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am
Hi Marcin,
Since you are thinking of this in the context of Amazon, I would suggest
taking a different route. Assign an Elastic IP (EIP) to each EC2 instance
running the ZK node & use the EIP in Solr. This way you could easily map
the EIP to a new EC2 instance subsequently, if required, and the ch
Hi Tom,
This is great. Should make it to the documentations.
Regards,
Aloke
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Burgmans, Tom <
tom.burgm...@wolterskluwer.com> wrote:
> I am also busy with getting this clear. Here are my notes so far (by
> copying and writing myself):
>
>
>
> queryWeight = the
Hi Robert,
You could look at pageDoc & pageScore to improve things for deep paging (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#pageDoc_and_pageScore).
Regards,
Aloke
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> Yes, expected.
>
> When it does a search for the first, say, 10 resul
ure and indexing DB or XML.
>
> Above project "boostraps" itself with all of the Java and Solr files it
> needs to run and starts Solr using bundled in Jetty web server, so as long
> as you have Tika in your libs and a configured handler you should be able
> to use it.
Hi,
Looking for feedback on running Solr Core/ Tika parsing engine on Azure.
There's one offering for Solr within Azure from Lucid works. This offering
however doesn't mention Tika.
We are looking at options to make content from files (doc, excel, pdfs,
etc.) stored within Azure storage search-ab
44 matches
Mail list logo
