Hi folks,
is it possible to copyField only if another field has a certain value? e.g.
copyField 'dc.subject' to 'image_suggestions' only if rdf
http://www.nsdl.org/ontologies/relationships#isInImageBank is true
thanks,
Alistair
--
mov eax,1
mov ebx,0
int 80h
place
>the field and field type definitions anywhere in the schema.xml.
>
>See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5228
>
>On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Alistair Young
> wrote:
>> working in a tiny tmux window does have some disadvantages, such as
working in a tiny tmux window does have some disadvantages, such as losing
one’s place in the file! the subject_autocomplete definition wasn’t inside
. Now that it is, everything is working. thanks for listening
Alistair
--
mov eax,1
mov ebx,0
int 80h
On 17/06/2015 15:17, "Alistair
st
>is supposed to point. Do you have any other component named "suggest"
>that you might be picking up?
>
>Best,
>Erick
>
>On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Alistair Young
> wrote:
>> yep did both of those things. Getting the same results as using
>>dc.sub
invoke spellcheck.build=true to re-build the
>spellcheck index?
>
>On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Alistair Young
> wrote:
>> copyField doesn¹t seem to fix the suggestion stemming. Copying the field
>> to another field of this type:
>>
>> > stored="true
copyField doesn¹t seem to fix the suggestion stemming. Copying the field
to another field of this type:
but I¹m still getting stemmed suggestions after rebuilding the index.
Alistair
--
mov eax,1
mov ebx,0
int 80h
On 17/06/2015 11:28, "Alistair Young" w
ah looks like I need to use copyField to get a non stemmed version of the
suggester field
Alistair
--
mov eax,1
mov ebx,0
int 80h
On 17/06/2015 11:15, "Alistair Young" wrote:
>I was wondering if there's a way to get the suggester to return whole
>words. Instead of
suggest
org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.Suggester
org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.fst.WFSTLookupFactory
dc.subject
0.005
true
true
suggest
true
10
true
suggest
thanks,
Alistair
--
mov eax,1
mov ebx,0
int 80h
yep seems that’s the answer. The highlighting is done separately by the
rails app, so I’ll look into proper solr highlighting.
thanks a lot for the use of your ears, much improved understanding!
cheers,
Alistair
--
mov eax,1
mov ebx,0
int 80h
On 16/06/2015 16:33, "Erick Erickson&qu
management changes’
must be near enough ‘manage change’ to trigger a result.
Alistair
--
mov eax,1
mov ebx,0
int 80h
On 16/06/2015 16:18, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
>I agree with Allesandro the behavior you're describing
>is _not_ correct at all given your description. So
0.0
35.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
35.0
thanks,
Alistair
--
mov eax,1
mov ebx,0
int 80h
On 16/06/2015 11:26, "Alessandro Benedetti"
wrote:
&g
hanges". It's relevant but I'd like to understand why solr is
returning it. Is it a combination of fuzzy/slop? The distance between the two
variations of the two words in the document is quite large.
thanks,
Alistair
--
mov eax,1
mov ebx,0
int 80h
Hello all,
I was wondering what does the "onlyMorePopular" option for spellchecking use
as its threshold? Will it always pick the suggestion that returns the most
queries or does it base its result based off of some threshold that can be
configured?
Thanks!
Ali.
--
View this message in conte
I've managed to solve this (in a quite hacky sort of way) by using filter
queries and the edismax queryparser.
I added in my solrconfig.xml the following parameters:
edismax
75%
Then when searching for multiple keywords (for example: schwarzkleid wenz,
where wenz is a german brand name)
Hi Siegfried,
the debug shows that the separated keywords get OR'd together so a match to
either keyword appears in the results. So if I am searching for:
*keywords:schwarzkleid* this will get transformed to *keywords:schwarz
keywords:kleid *which is equivalent to *keywords:schwarz OR keywords:kl
Hey Jack,
thanks for the reply. I added autoGeneratePhraseQueries="true" to the
fieldType and now it's giving me even more results! I'm not sure if the
debug of my query will be helpful but I'll paste it just in case someone
might have an idea. This produces 113524 results, whereas if I manually
e
Hello all,
I'm a fairly new Solr user and I need my search function to handle compound
words in German. I've searched through the archives and found that Solr
already has a Filter Factory made for such words called
DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilterFactory. I've already built a list of words
that I
Yep ignoring stop words. Thanks for the pointer.
Alistair
-
mov eax,1
mov ebx,0
int 80
On 04/09/2013 13:43, "Jack Krupansky" wrote:
>Do you have stop word filtering enabled? What does your field type look
>like?
>
>If stop words are ignored, yo
e word 'the' there are no hits at all.
Thanks,
Alistair
-
mov eax,1
mov ebx,0
int 80
thanks Michael, adding autoCommit sorted it.
cheers,
Alistair
--
mov eax,1
mov ebx,0
int 80h
On 23/07/2013 18:34, "Michael Della Bitta"
wrote:
>Hi Alistair,
>
>You probably need a commit, and not an optimize.
>
>Which version of Solr are you running against? T
rning:
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/";
xmlns:foxml="info:fedora/fedora-system:def/foxml#"
xmlns:zs="http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/"; warnCount="0" docCount="854"
deleteTotal="0" updateTotal="0" insertTotal="1" indexName="FgsIndex"/>
thanks,
Alistair
--
mov eax,1
mov ebx,0
int 80h
21 matches
Mail list logo
