s
> application we cannot use the uuid updateRequestProcessorChain
> individually?!
>
>
> Best,
> Zahra
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
--
Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
Senior Lead Software Engineer @ Gene Expressi
anyway
> to generate a correct uuid value in solr GUI similar to what solrj
> UUID.randomUUID().toString() generates?
>
> Best,
> Zahra
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
--
Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
Senior Lead
hecked in later versions that
unique returns approximate values for cardinalities higher than 100
(https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_2/json-facet-api.html#AggregationFunctions).
Please dismiss the previous email!
> On 27 Aug 2018, at 21:38, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
> wrote:
should I report it? It’s the fist time I’ve seen a disagreement
between unique and terms, and I don’t know how to reproduce it unless it’s with
our specific collection.
Many thanks in advance.
--
Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
Senior Lead Software Engineer @ Expression Atlas Team
European
ing to add. Feel free to create a ticket for this.
>>
>> Joel Bernstein
>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes <
>> amu...@ebi.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> I’m having a weird issue with the search streami
e
> search expression respect the rows parameter is something that I've been
> meaning to add. Feel free to create a ticket for this.
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes <
> amu...@ebi.ac.uk&g
ster, split into three
shards and running the same queries I get 30 and 12 results, respectively. So
it seems that the seach expression distributes the query between shards and
then aggregates the results. Is this the expected behaviour?
Thanks in advance.
--
Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
scale.
> On 22 Feb 2018, at 01:43, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
> On 2/21/2018 12:08 PM, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes wrote:
>> Some more details about my collection:
>> - Approximately 200M documents
>> - 1.2M different values in the field I’m faceting over
>>
>&g
by query works
> for you that might be the easiest way to go. The docs have good coverage of
> this topic.
>
>
>
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
>> On 2/21/2018 12
a sets with very high cardinality.
> The docs should describe the correct usage of the rollup expression with
> the /export handler.
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
>> On 2/20/2018 4:44 AM, A
feedback would be appreciated.
Many thanks in advance.
--
Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
Senior Lead Software Engineer @ Expression Atlas Team
European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI)
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Tel:+ 44 (0) 1223 49 2633
Skype: amunozpomer
confused other
users previously).
Cheers,
Alfonso
> On 12 Jun 2017, at 19:10, Susheel Kumar wrote:
>
> Change below type to string and try...
>
> text_en
>text_en
>
> Thanks,
> Susheel
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes <
lts
except when I enclose the parameter value with double quotes, in which case I
get an exception). In the example record above, species is of type string. In
schemaless mode the results are the same.
Using underscores in the species lets me filter properly, so the filtering
mechanism pe
experienced
and was the only cause of OOM. You may have the gc logs when OOM happened
and drawing it on GC Viewer may give insight how gradual your heap got
filled and run into OOM.
Thanks,
Susheel
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes <
amu...@ebi.ac.uk> wrote:
Tha
the OS to handle disk caching will result in
terrible performance.
What you've been told by me and and in other replies is discussed here:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceProblems
Thanks,
Shawn
--
Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
Software Engineer @ Expression Atlas Team
Eur
I wasn’t aware of docValues and filterCache policies. We’ll try to
fine-tune it and see if it helps.
Thanks so much for the info!
On 12/12/2016 12:13, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 10:13 +, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes wrote:
I’m writing because in our web application we’re
index size and
memory constraint of the VM, or something looks like it’s wildly misconfigured.
What do you think? Any useful pointers for some tuning we could do to improve
the service? Would upgrading to Solr 6 make sense?
Thanks a lot in advance.
--
Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
Software
useful pointers for some tuning we
could do to improve the service? Would upgrading to Solr 6 make sense?
Thanks a lot in advance.
--
Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
Software Engineer @ Expression Atlas Team
European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI)
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Tel:+ 44 (0
,
Edwin
On 29 February 2016 at 21:33, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
wrote:
Hi all.
I’ve been reading through the Suggester component in Solr at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Suggester.
I have a couple of questions regarding it which I haven’t been able to
find the answer for in
can set a request handler to do suggestions in this way instead than
with SuggestComponent. What are the downsides performance-wise?
Thank you in advance.
--
Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
Software Engineer @ Expression Atlas Team
European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI)
European Molecular
Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 17 September 2015 at 12:58, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
wrote:
We’re using SolrJ as well, but if I understood correctly I would need to
have the uniqueKey values anyway, right? There’s no way to do what I want
thing.
Cheers
2015-09-17 17:48 GMT+01:00 Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes :
You’re right, we’re not working with a uniqueKey and I wasn’t aware of
that requirement.
What I’d like is to update the documents without having to retrieve all of
them (or their unique ids). Basically, there are some data
hat's a documentation bug.
Thanks,
Shawn
--
Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
Software Engineer @ Expression Atlas Team
European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI)
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Tel:+ 44 (0) 1223 49 2633
Skype: amunozpomer
nson”, but instead a new document with only those fields was
created.
Is there a way to achieve what I described above, without reading all
the relevant documents, modify them, and then sending them back to Solr?
Thank you in advance.
--
Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes
Software Engineer @ Expre
This is unsupported at the moment and the devs ara aware of the issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7497
On 01/05/2015 16:53, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes wrote:
I forgot to add my "kingdomEnum" definition in schema.xml:
On 01/05/2015 16:38, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fue
I forgot to add my "kingdomEnum" definition in schema.xml:
enumsConfig="enumsConfig.xml" enumName="kingdom"/>
On 01/05/2015 16:38, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes wrote:
Hi,
I’m having problems when faceting over an EnumField such as this:
And in enumsCo
Hi,
I’m having problems when faceting over an EnumField such as this:
required="true" />
And in enumsConfig.xml:
plants
metazoa
fungi
A query such as the one below returns all buckets empty:
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/enumTest/query -d '
{
query: "*
27 matches
Mail list logo