Re: KeywordTokenizerFactory - trouble with "exact" matches

sea biscit the analyzer will be given the words "sea" and "biscit" seperately, and will not know that they match a synonym". Maybe the extended support for synonym handling is what will give us the solution one day. For now I have solved my problem and will leave it at t

Re: KeywordTokenizerFactory - trouble with "exact" matches

of was a ghost-like problem before. Allthough it would be great to have the opportunity to "disable" the splitting on whitespace even for DisMax, I understand that it probably not the most wanted feature for next solr release :) *Aleksander Akerø* Systemkonsulent Mobil: 944 89 054 E-pos

Re: KeywordTokenizerFactory - trouble with "exact" matches

s ok, because usually these results are somewhat related og within the same category. *Aleksander Akerø* Systemkonsulent Mobil: 944 89 054 E-post: aleksan...@gurusoft.no *Gurusoft AS* Telefon: 92 44 09 99 Østre Kullerød www.gurusoft.no 2014-01-30 Jack Krupansky > The standard, keyword-oriente

Re: KeywordTokenizerFactory - trouble with "exact" matches

also looked into these query-parsers, but as it may look like the splitting on whitespace is something that is done by the dismax queryparser before the terms are passed to any analyzers. And it is vital to me that I can differentiate this on a per field basis. *Aleksander Akerø* Systemkonsulent M

Re: KeywordTokenizerFactory - trouble with "exact" matches

the index lies, and I therefore have to reindex each time otherwise the index would be empty. Also i usually add use the "clean" parameter when testing with DIH. So that shouldn't be a problem. *Aleksander Akerø* Systemkonsulent Mobil: 944 89 054 E-post: aleksan...@gurusoft.no *Guru

Re: KeywordTokenizerFactory - trouble with "exact" matches

, it works perfectly, but then again, this query contains no whitespace. Any ideas? *Aleksander Akerø* Systemkonsulent Mobil: 944 89 054 E-post: aleksan...@gurusoft.no *Gurusoft AS* Telefon: 92 44 09 99 Østre Kullerød www.gurusoft.no 2014-01-29 Aleksander Akerø > Thanks for the quick answer, but it

Re: KeywordTokenizerFactory - trouble with "exact" matches

mewhere. This is my requestHandler btw, pretty basic: explicit edismax *:* 10 *,score number *Aleksander Akerø* Systemkonsulent Mobil: 944 89 054 E-post: aleksan...@gurusoft.no *Gurusoft

KeywordTokenizerFactory - trouble with "exact" matches

uot;solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" to the index side analyzer, thus adding trailing wildcard matches. E.g. return "FE 009-1", "FE 009-2" as well as "FE 009" when searching for "FE 009", but not "EE 009", and "ED 009". Would that be an ok way

Re: KeywordTokenizerFactory with whitespace

Sorry guys, please ignore this. It was not ready to be sent but got sent mistakenly. Will send a proper one later on. *Aleksander Akerø* Systemkonsulent Mobil: 944 89 054 E-post: aleksan...@gurusoft.no *Gurusoft AS* Telefon: 92 44 09 99 Østre Kullerød www.gurusoft.no 2014-01-29 Aleksander

KeywordTokenizerFactory with whitespace

* ** and this the field: ** Later if I get this to work I would also like to add the "solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" to add trailing or leading wildcard matches. E.g. return "FE 009-1", "FE 009-2" as well as "FE 009" whe

Facet field display name

"display name" for a facet field, that I could display instead of the field.name? *Aleksander Akerø* Systemkonsulent Mobil: 944 89 054 E-post: aleksan...@gurusoft.no *Gurusoft AS* Telefon: 92 44 09 99 Østre Kullerød www.gurusoft.no

RE: Facet sort numeric values

look pretty in a filter menu. I knew this question was a shot in the dark, but thank you for a nice explanation and possible solution! Aleksander Akerø @ Gurusoft AS Mobil: 944 89 054 QR-Code (Kontaktinfo) -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: 15

RE: Facet sort numeric values

vo, Omega, ... " How would this affect the sorting? I guess the TrieIntField is not applicable then. Aleksander Akerø @ Gurusoft AS Mobil: 944 89 054 QR-Code (Kontaktinfo) -Original Message- From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org] Sent: 14. august 2012 17:45 To: so

Facet sort numeric values

", but what I wanted was "6, 7, 10, 15, 23, 90". I do understand why it is done so but I would need a fix. I could apply a fix in the search interface for these particular values but I would prefer not to. Have anyone had the same problem or have any ideas for me? Thank you!

RE: no css on browse UI when multicore

From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com] Sent: 21. mai 2012 14:33 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: no css on browse UI when multicore On May 21, 2012, at 08:11 , Aleksander Akerø wrote: > The css files from the browse GUI in solr 3.6 does not seem to work >

no css on browse UI when multicore

this fixed is much appreciatedJ Regards, Aleksander Akerø

Multicore file handling

Hi I’m having problems with the file handling when using multicore setup in solr 3.6. The same issue that is described in Solr-1894 . In Jira it says that it has been fixed in 3.1, doesn’t that mean that it should work also for 3.6? The prob

3.6 browse gui

Hi I’ve started using solr 3.6 and would like to use the /browse requestHandler as i normally do. But it just gives me some lazyloading error when trying to reach /solr/browse. This would normally work in solr 3.4. So my question is what setup is needed for the velocity responseWriter

RE: Build solr with Maven

nd reflect that with your variable. In any case I don't think you can use a path relative to web.xml. I believe the work directory is somewhere else than /WEB-INF/ and that is the dir you need to make your variable relative to.. On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Aleksander Akerø wrote: >

RE: Build solr with Maven

:57 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Build solr with Maven I see.. Try to use ... in web.xml. Regards, Ingar On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Aleksander Akerø wrote: > Well, it's got all to do with how we have decided the rest of our > deployment environment. So the point

RE: Build solr with Maven

or individually. Then you can make adjustments to the config and reload core's at will, a feature you would lose with keeping solr_home within the webapp. Regards, Ingar On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Aleksander Akerø wrote: > Hi > > > > My company has just decided to use

Build solr with Maven

. I have come across some posts here and there which says that solr_home should not be placed within the webapp. Is that correct? If so, what are the reasons for it, and should it not work at all? Aleksander Akerø

Re: 3.5 QueryResponseWriter

Den 30.12.2011 06:03, skrev Chris Hostetter: : Looks like you've experienced the issue described with fixes here: : but specifically, since you've already copied the jar file in question, and are now getting a class not found for

3.5 QueryResponseWriter

Maybe someone could explain this for me? -- Aleksander Akerø Systemutvikler Mobil: 944 89 054 Gurusoft AS Telefon: 92 44 09 99 Østre Kullerød 5, 3241 Sandefjord www.gurusoft.no

[SOLR 3.5] QueryResponseWriter

Hi! So I've decided try out Solr 3.5.0. What I have done this far is basicly just to copy the /example/solr folder, install the webapp .war file in a tomcat instance and start up. At first I complained about the VelocityResponseWriter, so i created a /lib folder in /$SOLR_HOME and added the

Fwd: Reload core

action=RELOAD&core=collection1 Any tips og hints? -- Aleksander Akerø Systemutvikler Mobil: 944 89 054 Gurusoft AS Telefon: 92 44 09 99 Østre Kullerød 5, 3241 Sandefjord www.gurusoft.no