On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 05:18, Arpit Agarwal
wrote:
> Hi,
> Please unsubscribe my email address (arpit.agarwa...@gmail.com) from your
> mailing list .
>
Please follow the usual practice for subscribing from a public mailing
list: see https://lucene.apache.org/solr/community.html . You need to se
Hi,
Please unsubscribe my email address (arpit.agarwa...@gmail.com) from your
mailing list .
Thanks
Arpit A
Hello everyone,
I am using solr 8.3.
After I included Synonym Graph Filter in my managed-schema file, I have
noticed that if the query string contains a multi-word synonym, it
considers that multi-word synonym as a single term and does not break it,
further suppressing the default search behaviou
Hey Solr community,
I’m wondering if anyone has ever managed a zookeeper migration while running
SolrCloud or if they have any advice on the process (not a zookeeper upgrade
but a new physical instance migration)? I could not seem to find any endpoints
in the collections or coreadmin api’s tha
First off, use basic authentication to at least partially lock it down. Only
the application server has access to the password. Second, our IT people
thought Solr security insufficient to even remotely consider exposing to
external web. It lives behind firewall so do a kind of proxy. External qu
I don't think you can synonym-ize both the multi-token phrase and each
individual token in the multi-token phrase at the same time. But anyone else
feel free to chime in!
Best,
Audrey Lorberfeld
On 3/16/20, 12:40 PM, "atin janki" wrote:
I aim to achieve an expansion like -
Syno
I aim to achieve an expansion like -
Synonym(soap powder) + Synonym(soap) + Synonym (powder)
which is not happening because of the Synonym expansion is being done at
the moment.
At the moment, using Synonym Graph Filter with StandardTokenizer and sow
= false , expands as -
Synonym(soap powd
To confirm, you want a synonym like "soap powder" to map onto synonyms like
"hand soap," "hygiene products," etc? As in, more of a cognitive synonym
mapping where you feed synonyms that only apply to the multi-token phrase as a
whole?
On 3/16/20, 12:17 PM, "atin janki" wrote:
Using sow=t
Using sow=true, does split the word on whitespaces but it will not look for
synonyms of "soap powder" anymore, rather it expands separate synonyms for
"soap" and "powder".
Best Regards,
Atin Janki
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:59 PM Audrey Lorberfeld -
audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com wrote:
> Have you
Setting up Apache is off-topic, but it’s just a matter of ProxyPass to the Solr
app URL. I already gave you the relevant IP restriction configuration
directive, “Allow from “. The rest is in httpd documentation.
From: Ryan W
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 10:41 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.or
Have you set sow=true in your search handler? I know that we have it set to
false (sow = split on whitespace) because we WANT multi-token synonyms retained
as multiple tokens.
On 3/16/20, 10:49 AM, "atin janki" wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am using solr 8.3.
After I include
Hi Ryan
You should consider a simple rule based authorization scheme.
Your staff user can be given readonly privileges to everything you want to
except the admin ui.
Depending on which version of solr you are on this can be trivial.
- Aroop
> On Mar 16, 2020, at 8:46 AM, Ryan W wrote:
>
> On
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:51 AM Susheel Kumar
wrote:
> Basic auth should help you to start
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/basic-authentication-plugin.html
Thanks. I think I will give up on the plugin system. I haven't been able
to get the plugin system to work, and it creates
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:40 AM Walter Underwood
wrote:
> Also, even if you prevent access to the admin UI, a request to /update can
> delete
> all the content. It is really easy. This Gist shows how.
>
> https://gist.github.com/nz/673027/313f70681daa985ea13ba33a385753aef951a0f3
This seems im
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:32 AM Dunigan, Craig A. <
craig.duni...@landsend.com> wrote:
> Here are my suggestions. If you’re okay with IP restrictions only, then
> iptables.
Thanks! Just knowing this is an option helps. I took a stab at it but it
didn't work initially, but at least now I know
If your data changes slowly and you don’t need to shard, master/slave is great.
It is loosely coupled, so not as complicated as Solr Cloud. Each slave is an
exact
clone.
For master/slave, you can put an HTTP server (nginx, etc.) on each server and
proxy traffic to Solr. Then configure Solr to onl
Here are my suggestions. If you’re okay with IP restrictions only, then
iptables. If you don’t have *nix or root access, an Apache proxy server with
Allow from . If you want really, really secure, an stunnel front-end
that requires client certs that you install in your browsers. For us, we h
master slave is the idea that you have an indexing server you do all
indexing to and a search server that replicates the index, to deliver the
results etc. if you keep the indexer separate you can tune it differently
as well as protect the data. also means you can remove the delete/update
request
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:50 AM David Hastings <
hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Honestly? I know this isnt what youre going to want to hear, but security
> through obscurity. no one else knows what port the servers on, and its not
> accessible from anything outside of the internal netwo
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:09 AM Walter Underwood
wrote:
> What access do you want to prevent? How do you prefer to authenticate?
> How do you manage users or roles? Master/slave or Solr Cloud?
>
I want to prevent access to the admin UI.
I don't want to manage users or roles, preferably. I hav
What access do you want to prevent? How do you prefer to authenticate?
How do you manage users or roles? Master/slave or Solr Cloud?
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Mar 16, 2020, at 7:44 AM, Ryan W wrote:
>
> How do you, personally,
Thanks Jorn, though this all seems unrealistic. Because the technical
skill required to secure Solr far exceeds the technical skill required to
install it, I suspect there are probably a lot of insecure installs out
there. In many cases this will not apply: "if you work with people that
know a bi
Solr should not be accessible to end users directly - only through a dedicated
application in between.
Then in an enterprise setting it is mostly Kerberos auth. and https (do not
forget about zookeeper when using Solr cloud here you can also have Kerberos
auth and in recent version also SSL). I
IPtables seems like the way to go, at least for me.
Even if this basic-auth-plugin works, then you'll have to
deal with denial-of-service attacks (although these can
also happen indirectly, by hitting the website that uses Solr).
> On 16 Mar 2020, at 15:44, Ryan W wrote:
>
> How do you, personal
Basic auth should help you to start
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/basic-authentication-plugin.html
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:44 AM Ryan W wrote:
> How do you, personally, do it? Do you use IPTables? Basic Authentication
> Plugin? Something else?
>
> I'm asking in part so I'l have
Honestly? I know this isnt what youre going to want to hear, but security
through obscurity. no one else knows what port the servers on, and its not
accessible from anything outside of the internal network. if your solr
install can be accessed from an external IP you have much larger issues.
On
Hello everyone,
I am using solr 8.3.
After I included Synonym Graph Filter in my managed-schema file, I
have noticed that if the query string contains a multi-word synonym,
it considers that multi-word synonym as a single term and does not
break it, further suppressing the default search behaviou
How do you, personally, do it? Do you use IPTables? Basic Authentication
Plugin? Something else?
I'm asking in part so I'l have something to search for. I don't know where
I should begin, so I figured I would ask how others do it.
I haven't been able to find anything that works, so if you can
I use solr version 7.1. I have as grouped model in total 11M record, as below
example.
This question is, How do I sum fromfollowers field from this grouped model?
{
groupValue: "1927245294",
doclist: {
numFound: 1,
start: 0,
docs: [
It’s not at all clear what the problem is. If you have a single-shard
collection, just
1> create the stand-alone core
2> shut down the Solr instance
3> replace the stand-alone core's data dir with one from any of your prod
machines.
4> start Solr
An alternative is to use the replication API t
I use solr version 7.1. I have as grouped model in total 11M record, as below
example.
This question is, How do I sum fromfollowers field from this grouped model?
{
groupValue: "1927245294",
doclist: {
numFound: 1,
start: 0,
docs: [
Hi
I'm using solr-cloud (ver 6.6), got an error:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Exception writing document id (null) to
the index; possible analysis error: number of documents in the index cannot
exceed 2147483519
After googled it, I know the number is exceed one solr shard limit.
The col
32 matches
Mail list logo
