Do you know how URLs are structured? They include name=value pairs
separated by ampersands. This takes precedence over the contents of any
particular name or value. Consequently looking at your parenthesis doesn't
make sense since the open-close span ampersands and thus go to different
filter qu
Raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13808. Thanks, Jochen!
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 4:26 PM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Jochen, right! Sorry for didn't get your point earlier. {!bool filter=}
> means Lucene filter, not Solr's one. I suppose {!bool cache=true} flag can
> be easily ad
I had to do this recently on a Solr Cloud cluster. I wanted to export all the
IDs, but they weren’t stored as docvalues.
The fastest approach was to fetch all the IDs in one request. First, I make a
request for zero rows to get the numFound. Then I fetch numFound+1000 (in case
docs were added w
First, thanks for taking the time to ask a question with enough supporting
details that I can hope to be able to answer in one exchange ;). It’s a
pleasure to see.
Second, NP with asking on Stack Overflow, they have some excellent answers
there. But you’re right, this list gets more Solr-center
bq. My customer requested me to achieve 1000 qps with a single Solr.
You need to talk to your customer then and adjust expectations. You say you get
60 QPS with 40% CPU utilization. So let’s say QPS is perfectly linear to CPU
utilization and you can get CPU utilization to run at 100%.
In that c
Hello,
I'm trying to achieve that no replicas of collection A exist on the same
host as a replica of collection B.
Using Solr7.6
Both are large collections/will become large collections and load on 1
should not impact the other in any way. They will both be queried heavily,
simultaneously.
So,
Thanks,
Could you please help me in combining two geofilt fqs as the following gives
error, it treats ")" as part of the d parameter and gives error that 'd=80)'
is not a valid param:
({!geofilt}&sfield=adminLatLon&pt=33.0198431,-96.6988856&d=80)+OR+({!geofilt}&sfield=adminLatLon&pt=50.2171726,8
On Tue, 2019-10-01 at 19:08 +0900, Yasufumi Mizoguchi wrote:
> * The number of Firing hosts : 6
> * [Each host]ThreadGroup.num_threads : 200
> * [Each host]ThreadGroup.ramp_time : 600
> * [Each host]ThreadGroup.duration: 1800
> * [Each host]ThreadGroup.delay: 0
> * The number of sample queries: 20,
Hi Paras,
Thank you for your advice.
I will confirm JMeter's settings in addition to JVM options.
Yes, we are using documentCache and *after* finishing load test, we will
comment that out.
(By customer requests, we cannot update cache settings till the test
ends...)
Thanks,
Yasufumi
2019年10月1日
It is difficult to answer that for me.
My customer requested me to achieve 1000 qps with single Solr.
Thanks,
Yasufumi.
2019年10月1日(火) 14:59 Jörn Franke :
> Why do you need 1000 qps?
>
>
> > Am 30.09.2019 um 07:45 schrieb Yasufumi Mizoguchi <
> yasufumi0...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am
Hi Yasufumi,
Followings are current load test set up.
Did you try decreasing ramp_time and increasing num_threads or Firing
hosts? Out of 1800 secs, you are giving 200 threads a maximum of 600
seconds to get ready. I don't increase with this value when I want to test
parallel requests. In your c
Thank you for replying me.
I will try to resize NewRatio.
Thanks,
Yasufumi.
2019年10月1日(火) 11:19 Deepak Goel :
> Hello
>
> Can you please try increasing 'new size' and 'max new size' to 1GB+?
>
> Deepak
>
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, 13:35 Yasufumi Mizoguchi,
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Deepak.
> > Thank you
Thank you for your response.
Now, we have no JVM monitoring.
But checking GC logs, I found no major GC during load test.
As you saying, heap size might be too large and I am planning to reduce
that.
Thanks,
Yasufumi
2019年9月30日(月) 23:19 Walter Underwood :
> 31G is still a very large heap. We use
Ah, sorry.
Not JUnit, we use JMeter.
Thanks,
Yasufumi
2019年10月1日(火) 19:08 Yasufumi Mizoguchi :
> Thank you for replying me.
>
> Followings are current load test set up.
>
> * Load test program : JUnit
> * The number of Firing hosts : 6
> * [Each host]ThreadGroup.num_threads : 200
> * [Each host
Thank you for your response.
Our index has about 25,000,000 docs. Is this quite difficult to achieve
1000 qps with single Solr instance even if all index files are cached on OS
page cache?
And as you pointed out, there are lots of minor GC during the test, I will
try to resize NewRatio.
Thanks,
Thank you for replying me.
Followings are current load test set up.
* Load test program : JUnit
* The number of Firing hosts : 6
* [Each host]ThreadGroup.num_threads : 200
* [Each host]ThreadGroup.ramp_time : 600
* [Each host]ThreadGroup.duration: 1800
* [Each host]ThreadGroup.delay: 0
* The numb
Thanks,
Could you please also let me know how to combine two geofilt fqs because if
i use '&' like :
admin_directory_search_geolocation?q=david&fq=({!geofilt&sfield=adminLatLon&pt=33.0198431,-96.6988856&d=80})+OR+({!geofilt&sfield=adminLatLon&pt=50.2171726,8.265894&d=80})
then it gives me error a
Hi all,
As far as I understand, SolrCloud currently does not allow the use of
sorting by the pseudofield, score in the /export request handler (i.e., get
the results in relevancy order). If we do attempt this, we get an
exception, "org.apache.solr.search.SyntaxError: Scoring is not currently
suppo
Besides what all have suggested, can you share your testing setup? Are you
using JMeter? I'm asking this to confirm that your setup is "actually
trying" to generate 1000 simultaneous threads and not bottlenecking the
process. I get 170 qps easily on a simpler server but I remember that I
could not
19 matches
Mail list logo
