Re: Clustering error in Solr 8.2.0

Depends if they do breaking changes in common-lang or not. By using an old version of a library such as common-lang you may introduce security issues in your setup. > Am 13.08.2019 um 06:12 schrieb Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo : > > I have found that the Lingo3GClusteringAlgorithm will work if I copie

Re: Clustering error in Solr 8.2.0

I have found that the Lingo3GClusteringAlgorithm will work if I copied the commons-lang-2.6.jar from the previous version to solr-8.2.0\server\solr-webapp\webapp\WEB-INF\lib. Will this work in the long run? Because our lingo3g licence is not eligible to download the latest version of 1.16, so we

Re: Best way to retrieve parent documents with children using getBeans method?

Follow the instructions here: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/community.html#mailing-lists-irc. You must use the _exact_ same e-mail as you used to subscribe. If the initial try doesn't work and following the suggestions at the "problems" link doesn't work for you, let us know. But note you need

Re: Best way to retrieve parent documents with children using getBeans method?

Unsubscribe -- *P.S. We've launched a new blog to share the latest ideas and case studies from our team. Check it out here: product.canva.com . *** ** Empowering the world to design Also, we're hiring. Apply here!

Best way to retrieve parent documents with children using getBeans method?

Hello Everyone, We use SolrJ with POJOs to index documents into solr. If a POJO has a field annotated with @child then SolrJ automatically adds those objects as children of the POJO. This works fine and indexing is done properly. However, when I retrieve the same document through same POJO using

Re: Solr restricting time-consuming/heavy processing queries

Hi Jan, Thanks for the reply. Our normal search times is within 650 ms. We were analyzing some queries and found that few of them were like 14675 ms, 13767 ms etc... So was curious to see whether we have some way to restrict the query to not run beyond say 5s or some ideal timing in SOLR even if

Re: Moving to solrcloud from single instance

On 8/12/2019 1:42 PM, Erie Data Systems wrote: I am starting the planning stages of moving from a single instance of solr 8 to a solrcloud implementation. Currently I have a 148GB index on a single dedicated server w 96gb ram @ 16 cores /2.4ghz ea. + SSD disk. The search is fast but obviously th

Re: Moving to solrcloud from single instance

Unless you expect your index to grow, as long performance is satisfactory there’s no reason to shard. _Replicate_ perhaps if you need to sustain a higher QPS. Here’s a sizing blog I wrote a long time ago, but it still pertains. The short form is for you to load test one of your machines and fin

ltr (reranking) in combination with cursorMarks

Hello, I am trying to use ltr together with cursorMarks on solr 7.7 and I am getting the exception java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.lucene.search.TopDocs cannot be cast to org.apache.lucene.search.TopFieldDocs (full stacktrace below). Browsing Jira I have found an issue that suggests I sh

Re: Moving to solrcloud from single instance

I actually never had a problem with the index being larger than the memory for a standalone instance, but the entire index is on an SSD at least one my end On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:43 PM Erie Data Systems wrote: > I am starting the planning stages of moving from a single instance of solr > 8 to

Moving to solrcloud from single instance

I am starting the planning stages of moving from a single instance of solr 8 to a solrcloud implementation. Currently I have a 148GB index on a single dedicated server w 96gb ram @ 16 cores /2.4ghz ea. + SSD disk. The search is fast but obviously the index size is greater than the physical memory,

Re: more like this query parser with faceting

Thanks David. This page I was looking for. Roland David Hastings ezt írta (időpont: 2019. aug. 12., H, 20:52): > should be fine, > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/MoreLikeThisHandler > > for more info > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:49 PM Szűcs Roland > wrote: > > > Hi David, >

Re: more like this query parser with faceting

should be fine, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/MoreLikeThisHandler for more info On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:49 PM Szűcs Roland wrote: > Hi David, > Thanks the fast reply. Am I right that I can combine fq with mlt only if I > use more like this as a query parser? > > Is there a

Re: more like this query parser with faceting

Hi David, Thanks the fast reply. Am I right that I can combine fq with mlt only if I use more like this as a query parser? Is there a way to achieve the same with mlt as a request handler? Roland David Hastings ezt írta (időpont: 2019. aug. 12., H, 20:44): > The easiest way will be to pass in a

Re: more like this query parser with faceting

The easiest way will be to pass in a filter query (fq) On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:40 PM Szűcs Roland wrote: > Hi All, > > Is there any tutorial or example how to use more like this functionality > when we have some other constraints set by the user through faceting > parameters like price range,

more like this query parser with faceting

Hi All, Is there any tutorial or example how to use more like this functionality when we have some other constraints set by the user through faceting parameters like price range, or product category for example? Cheers, Roland

Re: Solr cloud questions

On 8/12/2019 5:47 AM, Kojo wrote: I am using Solr cloud on this configuration: 2 boxes (one Solr in each box) 4 instances per box Why are you running multiple instances on one server? For most setups, this has too much overhead. A single instance can handle many indexes. The only good reas

Re: Solr join

Hi Iniyan, Will you be able to provide the query that you use, as well as the error message that you received? Regards, Edwin On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 01:57, Iniyan wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to do join between 2 collections. For that I have followed the > tutorial how to create colocating co

Re: Clustering error in Solr 8.2.0

Hi Kevin, Thanks for the info. I think should be lingo3g problem. The problem occurs when I use Lingo3GClusteringAlgorithm. com.carrotsearch.lingo3g.Lingo3GClusteringAlgorithm If I change back to LingoClusteringAlgorithm, it will work. org.carrot2.clustering.lingo.LingoClusteringAlgorithm Rega

Re: Solr cloud questions

Kojo: The solr logs should give you a much better idea of what the triggering event was. Just increasing the heap doesn’t guarantee much, again the Solr logs will report the OOM exception if it’s memory-related. You haven’t told us what your physical RAM is nor how much you’re allocating to he

Re: solr: java.nio.file.accessdeniedexception

On 8/12/2019 6:44 AM, Rathor, Piyush wrote: We are facing following issue in data update on solr: java.nio.file.accessdeniedexception in solr cloud https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/UsingMailingLists We will need considerably more detail. Exceptions from Java are MANY lines l

RE: Solr mailing list

Hi Margo I am not trying to unsubscribe but we are facing following issue in data update on solr: java.nio.file.accessdeniedexception in solr cloud Thanks & Regards Piyush -Original Message- From: Jan Høydahl Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 3:23 AM To: margo.br...@indi.nl Cc: solr-user

solr: java.nio.file.accessdeniedexception

Hi Team We are facing following issue in data update on solr: java.nio.file.accessdeniedexception in solr cloud Thanks & Regards Piyush This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you ar

Solr cloud questions

Hi, I am using Solr cloud on this configuration: 2 boxes (one Solr in each box) 4 instances per box At this moment I have an active collections with about 300.000 docs. The other collections are not being queried. The acctive collection is configured: - shards: 16 - replication factor: 2 These t

Re: Solr is very slow with term vectors

Hi Doug / Walter, I'm just using this methodology. PFB link of my sample code. https://github.com/saaay71/solr-vector-scoring The only issue is speed of response for 1M records. On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:24 AM Walter Underwood wrote: > tf.idf was invented because cosine similarity is too much

Re: Contact for Wiki / Support page maintainer

Update: I had to add Jaroslaw with individual Space permission. Giving someone space permissions means they can edit all pages in the space unless they have Restrictions in pace. Guess that is a good solution, so anyone who wants to help out with the Wiki can get access, and should we need rest

Re: Solr mailing list

You may want to send an email to solr-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org instead, that should get you off the list :) -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 12. aug. 2019 kl. 08:46 skrev Margo Breäs | INDI : > > Unsubscribe